基于QUALIFLEX和LINMAP的简化中性犹豫模糊多属性决策方法

doi:10.12005/orms.2021.0183

运筹与管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 77-82.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2021.0183

基于QUALIFLEX和LINMAP的简化中性犹豫模糊多属性决策方法

于倩¹, 廖娅¹, 曹俊¹, 侯福均²

1.重庆科技学院工商管理学院,重庆 401331;
2.北京理工大学管理与经济学院,北京 100081

收稿日期:2019-04-30 出版日期:2021-06-25
作者简介:于倩(1984-),女,河北衡水,讲师,博士,研究方向:多属性决策,最优化分析。
基金资助:
重庆市教委科学技术研究项目资助(KJQN201901505);2019 年重庆市教育委员会人文社会科学研究重点项目(19SKGH181)

QUALIFLEX and LINMAP-based Approach for Multi-attribute Decision Making Problems with Simplified Neutrosophic Hesitant Fuzzy Sets

YU Qian¹, LIAO Ya¹, CAO Jun¹, HOU Fu-jun²

1. School of Business and Administration, Chongqing University of Science&Technology, Chongqing 401331, China;
2. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

Received:2019-04-30 Online:2021-06-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在处理多属性决策问题中,QUALIFLEX是一种非常有用的排序算法。针对属性取值为简化中性犹豫模糊集的多属性决策问题,提出了SNHFS-QUALIFLEX算法。另外考虑到属性权重不确定的情况,将LINMAP扩展到简化中性犹豫模糊集中,定义了符号距离,建立了最优数学规划模型来确定属性权重。最后将SNHFS-QUALIFLEX方法应用到多属性决策实例中,并验证了其可行性和有效性。

关键词: QUALIFLEX, LINMAP, 简化中性犹豫模糊集, 多属性决策

Abstract: QUALIFLEX (Qualitative Flexible Multiple Criteria Method) is a useful outranking method for multiple attribute decision analysis. The SNHFS-QUALIFLEX approach is proposed for solving multiple attribute decision making (MADM) problems where the evaluation values are in the form of simplified neutrosophic hesitant fuzzy sets (SNHFS). And considering the situation that the information of attributes is uncertain, we extend LINMAP method to determine the attributes'weights based on the defined signed distance. Furthermore, a SNHFS-QUALIFLEX approach is applied to supplier selection to validate the effectiveness of the proposed methodology.

Key words: QUALIFLEX, LINMAP, simplified neutrosophic hesitant fuzzy sets, multi-attribute decision making

中图分类号:

C934

于倩, 廖娅, 曹俊, 侯福均. 基于QUALIFLEX和LINMAP的简化中性犹豫模糊多属性决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 77-82.

YU Qian, LIAO Ya, CAO Jun, HOU Fu-jun. QUALIFLEX and LINMAP-based Approach for Multi-attribute Decision Making Problems with Simplified Neutrosophic Hesitant Fuzzy Sets[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(6): 77-82.

参考文献

[1] Zadeh L A. Fuzzy sets[J]. Information and control, 1965 (8): 338-353.
[2] Turksen I B. Interval Valued Fuzzy-sets Based on Normal Forms[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems; 1986, (20): 191-210.
[3] Atanassov K T. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy sets and Systems; 1986, (20): 87-96.
[4] Dubois D J. Fuzzy sets and systems: theory and applications[M]. Academic press; 1980.
[5] Atanassov K, Gargov G. Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy-sets[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1989, (31): 343-349.
[6] Torra V. Hesitant fuzzy sets, International Journal of Intelligent Systems; 2010, (25): 529-539.
[7] Xia M, Xu Z, Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning; 2011, (25): 395-407.
[8] Nadya Regina Galo, Lucas Daniel Del Rosso Calache, Luiz Cesar Ribeiro Carpinetti. A group decision approach for supplier categorization based on hesitant fuzzy and ELECTRE TRI[J]. International Journal of Production Economics: 2018, (202): 182-196.
[9] Guidong Sun, Xin Guan, Xiao Yi, Zheng Zhou. Grey relational analysis between hesitant fuzzy sets with applications to pattern recognition[J]. Expert Systems With Applications: 2018, (92): 521-532.
[10] Lauro Osiro, Francisco Rodrigues Lima-Junior , Luiz Cesar Ribeiro Carpinetti. A group decision model based on quality function deployment and hesitant fuzzy for selecting supply chain sustainability metrics[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production:2018,(183): 964-978.
[11] Fangwei Zhang, Jianbo Li, Jihong Chen, Jing Sun, Augustine Attey. Hesitant distance set on hesitant fuzzy sets and its application in urban road traffic state identification[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence: 2017, (61): 57-64.
[12] Fanyong Meng, Qingxian An. A new approach for group decision making method with hesitant fuzzy preference relations[J]. Knowledge Based Systems: 2017, (127): 1-15.
[13] Smarandache F. A Unifying Field in Logics, Neutrosophic Logic/Neutrosophy, Neutrosophic Set, Neutrosophic Probability[M]. Am. Res. Press, 1998.
[14] Wang H B, Smarandache F, Zhang Y Q, Sunderraman R. Single valued neutrosophic sets[J]. Reviewof the Air Force Academy, 2010, 1(1): 1-5.
[15] Paelinck J H. Qualitative multiple criteria analysis, environmental protection and multiregional development[J]. Papers in Regional Science, 1976, 36(1): 59-76.
[16] Paelinck J. Qualitative multicriteria analysis: an application to airport location[J]. Environment and Planning A, 1977, 9(8) :883-895.
[17] Paelinck J H P. Qualiflex: a flexible multiple-criteria method[J]. Economics Letters, 1978, 1(3): 193-197.
[18] Chen T Y, Chang C H, Lu J F R. The extended QUALIFLEX method for multiple criteria decision analysis based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and applications to medical decision making[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2013, 226(3): 615-625.
[19] Chen T Y. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy QUALIFLEX method with a likelihood-based comparison approach for multiple criteria decision analysis[J]. Information Sciences, 2014, 261: 149-169.
[20] Zhang X, Xu Z. Hesitant fuzzy QUALIFLEX approach with a signed distance-based comparison method for multiple criteria decision analysis[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42(2): 873-884.
[21] Ye J. A multicriteria decision-making method using aggregation operators for simplified neutrosophic sets[J]. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2014, 26(5): 2459-2466.
[22] Chen L H, Ouyang L Y. Fuzzy inventory model for deteriorating items with permissible delay in payment[J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2006, 182(1): 711-726.
[23] Chiang J. Fuzzy linear programming based on statistical confidence interval and interval-valued fuzzy set[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 129(1): 65-86.
[24] Srinivasan V, Shocker A D. Linear programming techniques for multidimensional analysis of preferences[J]. Psychometrika, 1973, 38(3): 337-369.
[25] Li D F. Extension of the linmap for multiattribute decision making under atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy environment[J]. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2008, 7(1): 17-34.
[26] Li D F, Sun T. Fuzzy linmap method for multiattribute group decision making with linguistic variables and incomplete information[J]. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 2007, 15(2): 153-173.
[27] Liu X D, Zhu J J, Zhang S T, Hao J J, Liu G D. Integrating linmap and topsis methods for hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision making[J]. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems. 2015, 28(1): 257-269.
[28] 于倩.不确定环境下的绿色供应商评价方法研究[D].北京理工大学,2016.

基于QUALIFLEX和LINMAP的简化中性犹豫模糊多属性决策方法

QUALIFLEX and LINMAP-based Approach for Multi-attribute Decision Making Problems with Simplified Neutrosophic Hesitant Fuzzy Sets

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	胡文发, 何新华. 绿色建筑前期设计阶段的多目标优化及多属性决策模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(7): 44-49.
[2]	吴澎, 吴群, 周礼刚, 陈华友. 基于多目标属性权重优化的犹豫模糊语言TOPSIS决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 42-47.
[3]	杨敏, 张仕斌, 张航. 基于新模糊熵和得分函数的区间直觉模糊多属性决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 63-68.
[4]	李清水, 李登峰, 李辉, 余高锋. 基于前景理论的区域绿色经济发展水平多指标评价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 118-123.
[5]	李茹霞, 扈文秀, 齐晓亮. 区间二型模糊集效用函数和熵在风险决策中的应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(5): 102-109.
[6]	李鹏宇, 吴冲. 基于改进得分函数的直觉梯形模糊数群体多属性决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 76-80.
[7]	朱峰, 刘玉敏, 徐济超, 苏冰杰. 基于相似度和改进雷达图的概率犹豫模糊多属性决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 109-114.
[8]	汪兰林, 李登峰. 基于在线评价信息的概率语言多属性变权决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(2): 39-44.
[9]	刘政敏, 徐洪雪, 刘培德, 梁霞. 考虑多元关联关系和语义变换的直觉不确定语言多属性决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(2): 45-52.
[10]	李娜, 高雷阜, 王磊. 基于Pythagorean模糊熵的风险型决策方法——考虑后悔与失望规避[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(6): 130-138.
[11]	曾守桢, 骆丹丹. 基于投影模型的区间直觉模糊多属性决策方法研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(3): 10-15.
[12]	李鹏, 沈志杰. 基于广义WOWA算子的Pythagorean模糊决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(2): 58-65.
[13]	王磊, 陶刘芹. Picture模糊幂几何Heronian平均算子及其在多属性决策中的应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(12): 59-66.
[14]	朱峰, 徐济超, 刘玉敏, 王宁. 广义概率对偶犹豫模糊语言幂集结算子在多属性决策中的应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(10): 59-67.
[15]	刘宁元. 考虑决策者心理行为的直觉语言多属性决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(7): 11-16.