碳税机制下考虑不同低碳策略的动态博弈模型及复杂性研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2022.0113

运筹与管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 55-60.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2022.0113

碳税机制下考虑不同低碳策略的动态博弈模型及复杂性研究

郑清, 阿布都热合曼·卡的尔

新疆财经大学信息管理学院,新疆乌鲁木齐 830012

收稿日期:2020-08-14 出版日期:2022-04-25 发布日期:2022-05-13
通讯作者: 阿布都热合曼·卡的尔(1975-),男,新疆乌鲁木齐人,教授,博士生导师,博士,研究方向:复杂系统研究、供应链建模与应用、混沌理论。
作者简介:郑清(1995-),男,甘肃张掖人,硕士研究生,研究方向:闭环供应链复杂性与混沌控制;
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71462029);新疆高校科研计划自然科学重点项目(XJEDU2019I023);新疆维吾尔自治区研究生科研创新项目(XJUFE2020K045)

Research on Dynamic Game Model and Complexity Considering Different Low-carbon Strategies under Carbon Tax Mechanism

ZHENG Qing, AR Budureheman·Kader

School of Information Management, Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics, Urumqi, 830012, China

Received:2020-08-14 Online:2022-04-25 Published:2022-05-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 考虑碳排放税,建立双寡头制造商分别实施废品回收和绿色低碳广告投入策略的动态博弈模型。通过系统稳定域,分岔图,功率谱等分析了博弈模型纳什均衡解处的稳定性及参数对系统稳定域的影响,同时对系统的复杂性特征进行了研究。结果表明,消费者回收价格敏感性增加会使整个系统稳定域缩小,而绿色低碳广告投入水平增加只会使实施该策略的企业自身稳定域扩大;当制造商价格调整速度过快时,系统会进入混沌状态;混沌状态下,对比实施广告策略的制造商,实施废品回收策略的制造商价格调整行为对市场造成的震荡更大。最后使用反馈控制策略对系统混沌状态进行了有效的控制,研究结果对制造商低碳策略选择及价格决策有着较好的借鉴意义。

关键词: 碳排放税, 闭环供应链, 动态博弈, 复杂性分析

Abstract: The paper establishes the dynamic game model in which duopoly manufacturers implement waste recycling and green low-carbon advertising investment strategies, under carbon emission tax. The system stability region, bifurcation diagram, power spectrum and other methods are used to analyze the stability of the Nash equilibrium solution on the game model, and the influence of parameters on the system stability region. We study the complexity characteristics of the system. The results show an increasein the sensitivity of consumer recycling prices can reduce the stability of the entire system, and an increasein the level of low-carbon advertising can only expand the stability of the self. Too fast adjustment speed of price can make the system enter in chaos. Further, compared with manufacturers who implement advertising strategies, another price adjusting can cause greater market turbulence. Finally, the feedback control strategy is used to control the system chaos.

Key words: emission tax, closed-loop supply chain, dynamic game, complexity analysis

中图分类号:

F224
F274

郑清, 阿布都热合曼·卡的尔. 碳税机制下考虑不同低碳策略的动态博弈模型及复杂性研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(4): 55-60.

ZHENG Qing, AR Budureheman·Kader. Research on Dynamic Game Model and Complexity Considering Different Low-carbon Strategies under Carbon Tax Mechanism[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2022, 31(4): 55-60.

参考文献

[1] 赵静敏,赵爱文.碳减排约束下国外碳税实施的经验与启示[J].管理世界,2016,(12):174-175.
[2] Ding J F, Chen W D, Wang W B. Production and carbon emission reduction decisions for remanufacturing firms under carbon tax and take-back legislation[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2020, 143: 1-16.
[3] 熊中楷,张盼,郭年.供应链中碳税和消费者环保意识对碳排放的影响[J].系统工程理论与实践,2014,34(9):2245-2252.
[4] 曹细玉,张杰芳.碳减排补贴与碳税下的供应链碳减排决策优化与协调[J].运筹与管理,2018,27(4): 57-61.
[5] 杨惠霄,骆建文.碳税政策下的供应链减排决策研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2016,36(12):3092-3106.
[6] 谭春桥,肖文志,冯中伟.损失厌恶型双渠道供应链定价与减排策略研究[J].工业技术经济,2019,38(7):119-128.
[7] Xie Ma. Study the complexity and control of the recycling-supplychain of China’s color TVs market based on the governmentsubsidy[J]. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulat, 2016, (38): 102-116.
[8] Lou Ma. Complexity of sales effort and carbon emission reductioneffort in a two-parallel household appliance supply chainmodel[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2018, (64): 398-425.
[9] Fan Zhu L. Study of game models and the complex dynamics of alow-carbon supply chain with an altruistic retailer underconsumers’ low-carbon preference[J]. Physic A, 2019, (528): 1-18.
[10] Ma Hou, Tian.Research on the complexity of green innovative enterprise in dynamicgame model and governmental policy making[J]. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2019, X(2): 1-11.
[11] Zhao Chang D U. Dynamics analysis on competition between manufacturing andremanufacturing in context of government subsidies[J]. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 2019, (121): 119-128.
[12] Zhan Ma, Li Zhu. Design and coordination for multi-channel recycling of oligopolyunder the carbon tax mechanism[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, (223): 413-423.
[13] Wang Hou. A duopoly game with heterogeneous green supply chains in optimalprice and market stability with consumer green preference[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, (255): 1-9.
[14] 范如国,林金钗,朱超平,朱开伟.考虑利他行为的低碳供应链决策模型及其复杂性分析[J].软科学,2019,33(11):85-91.
[15] 王芹鹏,赵道致,何龙飞.供应链企业碳减排投资策略选择与行为演化研究[J].管理工程学报,2014,28(3):180-189.
[16] Dominika Machowska. Delayed effects of cooperative advertising in goodwill dynamics[J]. Operations Research Letters, 2019, 47(3): 178-184.

碳税机制下考虑不同低碳策略的动态博弈模型及复杂性研究

Research on Dynamic Game Model and Complexity Considering Different Low-carbon Strategies under Carbon Tax Mechanism

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张天瑞, 魏铭琦, 高秀秀, 王淑梅. 基于交互式模糊规划方法的可持续闭环供应链网络规划[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(8): 81-86.
[2]	姚锋敏, 闫颍洛, 刘珊, 滕春贤. 政府补贴下考虑CSR投入的闭环供应链回收及定价决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 69-76.
[3]	李鹏宇, 徐士琴, 韩继业. 带有环境指示因子的闭环供应链网络均衡的互补模型研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(5): 38-45.
[4]	史思雨, 孙静春, 邓飞. 风险规避型零售商资金约束下双渠道闭环供应链的定价决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 1-9.
[5]	尤天慧, 刘春怡, 曹兵兵. 考虑成员风险态度的零售商资金约束闭环供应链定价与回收决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 10-17.
[6]	张克勇, 李江鑫, 姚建明, 李春霞. 零售商采购资金约束下第三方再制造闭环供应链决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 26-32.
[7]	范定祥, 李重莲, 王晓蕾. 基于Stackelberg博弈的闭环供应链回收模式选择及其优化研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 135-141.
[8]	卞文良, 潘岳, 王文宾, 全诗苑, 刘笑颜. 维修中心参与回收时闭环供应链的定价决策及回收模式选择[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(3): 76-82.
[9]	姚锋敏, 刘珊, 滕春贤. 两零售商竞争下第三方回收闭环供应链的决策及协调[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(3): 83-89.
[10]	尉迟群丽, 何正文, 王能民. 考虑缺货的闭环供应链选址-库存-路径集成优化[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(2): 53-60.
[11]	刘凯, 李春发, 李冬冬. 电商平台主导的E-闭环供应链定价、服务决策与回收模式[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 51-57.
[12]	张川, 陈宇潇. 政府补贴下考虑规模效应的动力电池梯次利用闭环供应链决策与协调[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 72-77.
[13]	姚锋敏, 刘珊, 胡宪武, 滕春贤. 公平关切下零售商主导闭环供应链的定价策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(8): 120-127.
[14]	王文宾, 丁军飞. 奖惩机制下零售商信息分享对闭环供应链的影响研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(7): 89-98.
[15]	于春海, 冯俏, 荣冬玲. 基于均值-CVaR的闭环供应链回购契约协调策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(6): 58-64.