基于概率语言术语集改进TODIM法的应急物流供应商评价研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2022.0202

运筹与管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 196-203.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2022.0202

基于概率语言术语集改进TODIM法的应急物流供应商评价研究

郭子雪¹, 杨雅旭¹, 贺泽芳²

1.河北大学管理学院,河北保定 071002;
2.北京物资学院信息学院,北京 101149

收稿日期:2020-09-20 出版日期:2022-06-25 发布日期:2022-07-20
作者简介:郭子雪(1964-),男,河北清河人,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为决策理论与方法、应急管理、物流与供应链管理等;杨雅旭(1992-),女,河北保定人,博士生,研究方向为决策理论与方法;贺泽芳(1980-),女,讲师,研究方向为计算机技术与物联网工程。
基金资助:
国家社科基金一般项目(20BTJ012);北京市智能物流系统协同创新中心开放课题(BILSCIC-2019KF-15);河北省教育厅人文社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(ZD201439);保定市哲学社会科学项目(2020046)

Evaluation of Emergency Logistics Suppliers Based on the Improved TODIM Method Based on Probabilistic Linguistic Term Sets

GUO Zi-xue¹, YANG Ya-xu¹, HE Ze-fang²

1. School of Management, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China;
2. School of Information,Beijing Wuzi University, Beijing 101149, China

Received:2020-09-20 Online:2022-06-25 Published:2022-07-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了科学合理地评价应急物流供应商,提出了一种基于概论语言术语集改进TODIM法的评价方法。针对应急物流的特点,从快速响应时间、物资质量、成本控制、企业服务和企业内外部条件五个维度,构建应急物流供应商评价指标体系;在此基础上,为充分反映专家的偏好和评价信息,将概率语言术语集与TODIM方法相结合,构建基于改进TODIM方法的评价模型,对应急物流供应商进行评价;最后,通过实例分析验证该方法的可行性与有效性。

关键词: 应急物流供应商, 概率语言术语集, TODIM, 评价

Abstract: The scientific and reasonable evaluation of emergency logistics suppliers is of great significance to the establishment and improvement of disaster relief material reserve system and emergency material guarantee system. In this paper,aiming at the characteristics of emergency logistics, an evaluation model of emergency logistics supplier is constructed by combining probabilistic linguistic term sets with improved TODIM method. It includes five indicators: the fast response time, material quality, cost control, enterprise services and enterprise internal and external conditions. The evaluation model of emergency logistics suppliers is established to sort and select the best alternative suppliers, which fully reflects the preference of experts and evaluating information, improves the effectiveness of the emergency logistics decision. Finally, an example is given to verify the effectiveness of the method.

Key words: emergency logistics supplier, probabilistic linguistic term sets, TODIM method, evaluation

中图分类号:

N945

郭子雪, 杨雅旭, 贺泽芳. 基于概率语言术语集改进TODIM法的应急物流供应商评价研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6): 196-203.

GUO Zi-xue, YANG Ya-xu, HE Ze-fang. Evaluation of Emergency Logistics Suppliers Based on the Improved TODIM Method Based on Probabilistic Linguistic Term Sets[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2022, 31(6): 196-203.

参考文献

[1] Ou Z, Wang H, Jiang D. Emergency logistics[J]. Journal of Chongqing University(Natural Science Edition), 2004, 27(3): 164-167.
[2] EdizEkinci, Beste K. Emergency logistics planning in nature disasters[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2004, 129: 217-245.
[3] Chayangkul Na Aduthaya, Tanaporn. A fuzzy inference system approach for supplier evaluation[D].Regina: The Vniversity of Regina, 2006.6
[4] M. S. Q. Zulkar Nine, Md. A. K. Khan, mahedi hasanul hoque, mohammad ameer ali, nikhil c. shil, golam sorwar. vendor selection using fuzzy c means algorithm and analytic hierarchy process[J]. Fuzzy Systems, 2009, 8: 181-184.
[5] 韩瑞珠,曹国,鲁邦旺.基于FAHP的应急物流外包供应商绩效综合评价[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2007(37):348-354.
[6] 江孝感,冯勤超,陈丰琳.应急采购供应商选择问题[J].东南大学学报(英文版),2007,123:124-127.
[7] 刘乃娟.应急物资采购的供应商选择研究[D].北京:北京交通大学,2011.
[8] 王帮俊,杨东涛.基于集对分析的军地一体化应急物流供应商评价研究[J].运筹与管理,2012,21(6):63-67.
[9] 商丽媛,谭清美.基于灰熵模型的应急物流供应商评价[J].统计与决策, 2013(3):45-47.
[10] 闫佳丽.基于D Number和LINMAP的应急物资供应商评价方法研究[D].北京:北京理工大学,2015.
[11] 符瑜.基于多目标的应急供应商选择研究[J].物流工程与管理,2015,37(10):74-75.
[12] 陕振沛,郭亚丹,宁宝权,张文林.基于组合赋权灰色关联改进TOPSIS法的应急物流供应商评价[J].数学的实践与认识,2019,49(8):71-78.
[13] Zadeh L A. Fuzzy sets[M]. Information ＆ Control, 1965, 8(3): 338-353.
[14] Chen N, Xu Z, Xia M. Interval valued hesitant preference relations and their application in decision support system[J]. Knowledge Based Systems, 2013, 37(4): 357-365.
[15] Zhu B, Xu Z, Xia M. Dual hesitant fuzzy sets[J]. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2012, 26(5): 410-425.
[16] Wei G, Wang H, Zhao X, et al. Hesitant triangular fuzzy information aggregation in multiple attribute decision making[J]. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2014, 26(3): 1201-1209.
[17] Lin R, Zhao X, WEI G. Models for selecting and ERP system with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information[J]. Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2014, 26(5): 2155-2165.
[18] Qian G, Wang H, Feng X Q. Generalized hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in decision support system[J]. Knowledge Based Systems, 2013, 37(4): 357-365.
[19] Pang Q, Wang H, Xu Z. Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making[J]. Information Sciences, 2016, 369: 128-143.
[20] Gou X, Xu Z. Novel basic operational laws for linguistic terms, hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and probabilistic linguistic term sets[J]. Information Sciences, 2016, 372: 407-427.
[21] Wang X, Wang J, Zhang H. Distance-based multicriteria group decision-making approach with probabilistic linguistic term sets[J]. Expert Systems, 2019,36: e12352.
[22] Liu P, Li Y. Multi-attribute decision making method based on generalized maclaurin symmetric mean aggregation operators for probabilistic linguistic information[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2019, 131: 282-294.
[23] Lan J B, Qing S, Chen Q M, Wang Z X. Group decision making based on induced uncertain linguistic OWA operators[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2013, 55(1): 296-303.
[24] Pang Q, Wang H, Xu Z. Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making[J]. Information Sciences, 2016, 369: 128-143.
[25] Bai C, Zhang R, Qian L, Wu Y. Comparisons of probabilistic linguistic term sets for multi-criteria decision making[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2016, 119: 284-291.
[26] 吴敏.概率语言多属性群决策方法及其在金融科技公司选择中的应用[D].南昌:江西财经大学,2019.
[27] 王应明.运用离差最大化方法进行多指标决策与排序[J].系统工程与电子技术,1998,20(7):24-26.
[28] Gomes L F A M, Lima M M P P. TODIM: basics and application to multicriteria ranking of projects with environmental impacts[J]. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 1991, 16: 113-127.
[29] Hu J, Yang Y, Chen X. A novel TODIM method based three-way decision model for medical treatment election[J]. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2018, 20: 1240-1255.
[30] Ji P, Zhang H, Wang J. A projection based TODIM method under multi-valued neuromorphic environments and its application in personnel selection[J]. Neural Computing & Applications, 2018, 29: 221-234.
[31] Llamazares B. An analysis of the generalized TODIM method[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, 269: 1041-1049.
[32] Lourenzutti R, Krohling R A. TODIM based method to process heterogeneous information[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2015, 55(1): 318-327.

基于概率语言术语集改进TODIM法的应急物流供应商评价研究

Evaluation of Emergency Logistics Suppliers Based on the Improved TODIM Method Based on Probabilistic Linguistic Term Sets

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	岳立柱, 陆畅, 张志杰. 综合评价模型的偏序集表示[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(5): 101-106.
[2]	张硕硕, 党延忠. 出租车司机社会贡献评价方法研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(5): 130-135.
[3]	张凯, 张明慧. 基于云模型和证据理论的科技创新与持续发展能力评价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(4): 109-115.
[4]	高纪兵, 宋奎, 焦建玲. 基于多元价值目标的重大复杂工程评价研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(4): 116-122.
[5]	斯琴, 马占新. 基于DEA交叉评价的模糊有效性度量方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(4): 123-128.
[6]	邵辉, 黄朝晖. 一线救治伤员后送资源配置策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(3): 127-131.
[7]	沈延安, 张君彪. 基于改进证据理论的绩效综合评价模型及其应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(3): 132-137.
[8]	王雪原, 李姗. 基于投影寻踪-随机森林的制造企业供应链稳定性评价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(3): 171-178.
[9]	杨锴, 赵希男, 周岩. 考虑层次结构的独立董事治理多优势评价方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(3): 227-232.
[10]	易平涛, 王士烨, 李伟伟, 王露, 董乾坤. 基于先验信息和一维数据聚类的专家赋权方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(3): 31-37.
[11]	李柏敏, 翁世洲, 吕跃进. 基于粗糙集的北部湾区域物流发展协调性评价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(2): 133-140.
[12]	陈亮, 刘欣慧, 李春友. 商业银行财务绩效偏序集评价研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(1): 196-201.
[13]	张永政, 叶春明, 耿秀丽. 基于概率语言术语集的服务外包风险评估方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(9): 203-209.
[14]	徐建中, 翟佳琦. 基于云模型-灰色关联分析的云平台军民融合创新方案评价研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(7): 154-159.
[15]	黄诗童, 赵希男, 柳森. 基于粒子群优化的竞优评析拓展方法及评价引导功效——以TOPSIS模式为例[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(7): 160-166.