增长期权对最优资本结构的影响研究:企业生命周期的视角

doi:10.12005/orms.2023.0037

运筹与管理 ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 227-232.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2023.0037

增长期权对最优资本结构的影响研究:企业生命周期的视角

李准^1,2, 李强², 曾勇²

1.浙江万里学院商学院,浙江宁波 315100;
2.电子科技大学经济与管理学院,四川成都 611731

收稿日期:2021-01-18 出版日期:2023-01-25 发布日期:2023-03-01
通讯作者: 李强(1980-),男,山西人,教授,博士,博士生导师,研究方向:公司金融,商业银行与金融科技。
作者简介:李准(1987-),男,山东人,讲师,博士,研究方向:实物期权与资产定价;曾勇(1963-),男,四川人,教授,博士,博士生导师,研究方向:公司金融与资产市场,金融投资与金融工程。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71972027,71472025);2014年文化名家暨“四个一批”人才资助项目(中宣办发[2015]49号);四川省软科学研究计划(2022JDR0290)

Study on the Influence of Growth Options on the Optimal Capital Structure: A Perspective from Firm Lifecycle

LI Zhun^1,2, LI Qiang², ZENG Yong²

1. Business School, Zhejiang Wanli University, Ningbo 315100, China;
2. School of Management and Economics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China

Received:2021-01-18 Online:2023-01-25 Published:2023-03-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 资产构成和生命周期的动态关系决定了企业最优资本结构的变化趋势。本文在利息税盾和破产成本的权衡理论框架下,运用实物期权方法,理论上揭示了增长期权动态执行导致最优资本结构随企业生命周期的变化规律,扩展分析了股东-债权人代理冲突对最优资本结构的影响,并提供了基于中国沪深A股上市公司的经验证据。结果表明:随着企业由年轻走向成熟,增长期权不断执行和在位资产逐渐累积会降低企业总体的破产风险,从而企业最优财务杠杆呈现上升趋势且增长速度逐渐放缓;股东和债权人在增长期权执行决策上的代理冲突导致的投资不足会降低最优财务杠杆,但代理成本随企业生命周期推进呈递减趋势。

关键词: 资本结构, 生命周期, 增长期权, 代理成本

Abstract: The dynamic relation between asset composition and firm lifecycle determines the changing trend of optimal capital structure over time. In a framework with the trade-off between interest tax shield and bankruptcy cost, this paper uses real option approach to demonstrate the evolvement of optimal capital structure over firm lifecycle as a result of the dynamical exercising of growth options, and then extends to analyze the effect of stockholder-bondholder conflict on optimal capital structure, and finally provides evidence from A-share firms listed on Shanghai and Shenzhen exchanges. The results show that the whole bankruptcy risk will decrease as the exercising of growth options and the accumulation of assets-in-place over firm lifecycle, and hence the optimal financial leverage exhibits an increasing trend with decreasing growth rate as the firm gradually becomes mature. In the presence of the agency conflict between shareholders and debtholders on exercising growth options, the appearance of underinvestment will do harm for optimal financial leverage, but the agency cost arising from underinvestment decreases along with firm lifecycle.

Key words: capital structure, firm lifecycle, growth options, agency cost

中图分类号:

F275

李准, 李强, 曾勇. 增长期权对最优资本结构的影响研究:企业生命周期的视角[J]. 运筹与管理, 2023, 32(1): 227-232.

LI Zhun, LI Qiang, ZENG Yong. Study on the Influence of Growth Options on the Optimal Capital Structure: A Perspective from Firm Lifecycle[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2023, 32(1): 227-232.

参考文献

[1] Evans D S. Tests of alternative theories of firm growth[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1987, 95(4): 657-674.
[2] Raff R, Kwof W C, Podolski E J, et al. Do corporate policies follow a life-cycle?[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2016, 69: 95-107.
[3] Dickinson V. Cash flow patterns as a proxy for firm life cycle[J]. Accounting Review, 2011, 86(6): 1969-1994.
[4] DeAngelo H, DeAngelo L, Stulz R M. Dividend policy and the earned/contributed capital mix: a test of the life-cycle theory[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2006, 81(2): 227-254.
[5] 宋福铁,屈文洲.基于企业生命周期理论的现金股利分配实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2010(2):140-149.
[6] Pástor L, Pietro V. Stock valuation and learning about profitability[J]. Journal of Finance, 2003, 58(5): 1749-1790.
[7] Liu H, Li Q, Zeng Y. Firm valuation over lifecycle: a perspective on growth options[J]. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 2018, 47(5): 720-743.
[8] Chincarini L B, Kim D, Moneta F. Beta and firm age[J]. Journal of Empirical Finance, 2020, 58: 50-74.
[9] Saravia J A, García C S, Almonacid P M. The determinants of systematic risk: a firm lifecycle perspective[J]. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 2021, 26(1): 1037-1049.
[10] Hasan M, Hossain M, Cheung A, et al. Corporate life cycle and cost of equity capital[J]. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 2015, 11(1): 46-60.
[11] 刘浩.生命周期视角下增长期权影响企业估值和风险-收益特征的研究[D].成都:电子科技大学,2018.
[12] Bernardo A E, Chowdhry B, Goyal C A. Growth options, beta, and the cost of capital[J]. Financial Management, 2007, 36(2): 5-17.
[13] 朱宏泉,范露萍,舒兰.成长性、现有资产与β关系的上市公司实证研究[J].管理学报,2012,9(2):303-314.
[14] Leland H E. Agency costs, risk measurement, and capital structure[J]. Journal of Finance, 1998, 53(4): 1213-1243.
[15] Mauer D C, Ott S H. Agency costs, underinvestment, and optimal capital structure: the effect of growth options to expand[J]. In: Brennan M J, Trigeorgis L(Eds.), Project flexibility, agency, and competition. Oxford University Press, New York, 2000: 151-180.
[16] 彭程,杨红,黄荣.基于税收利益与破产成本的企业投融资决策互动关系研究[J].中国管理科学,2011,19(3):46-54.
[17] Sundaresan S, Wang N, Yang J Q. Dynamic investment, capital structure and debt overhang[J]. Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 2015, 4(1): 1-42.
[18] 李准,李强,曾勇.增长期权的执行、创造与资产风险溢价——企业生命周期的视角[J].中国管理科学,2018,26(10):1-9.
[19] Leland H E. Corporate debt value, bond covenants, and optimal capital structure[J]. Journal of Finance, 1994, 49(4): 1213-1252.
[20] Dixit A K, Pindyck R S. Investment under uncertainty[M]. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1994.
[21] 李强,曾勇.基于实物期权的技术创新非效率投资行为[J].系统工程理论与实践,2009,29(2):18-29.
[22] Mauer D C, Sarkar S. Real options, agency conflicts, and optimal capital structure[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2005, 29: 1405-1428.
[23] Loderer C, Stulz R, Waelchli U. Firm rigidities and the decline in growth opportunities[J]. Management Science, 2016, 63(9): 3000-3020.
[24] Richardson S. Over-investment of free cash flow[J]. Review of Accounting Studies, 2006, 11(2): 159-189.
[25] 李强,纪佳君,巨航宇.非效率投资与债务结构:来自中国的实证证据[J].投资研究,2014(3):66-79.
[26] 侯巧铭,宋力,蒋亚朋.管理者行为、企业生命周期与非效率投资[J].会计研究, 2017(3): 61-67.
[27] Gilje E P. Do firms engage in risk-shifting? empirical evidence[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2016, 29(11): 2925-2954.
[28] Wang C W, Chiu W C, King T H D. Debt maturity and the cost of bank loans[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2020, 112: 1052.

增长期权对最优资本结构的影响研究:企业生命周期的视角

Study on the Influence of Growth Options on the Optimal Capital Structure: A Perspective from Firm Lifecycle

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	杨坤, 汪万, 胡斌. 全生命周期视阈下责任式创新的演化博弈及扩散机制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 103-110.
[2]	陈佳, 李强, 曾勇. 资产剥离对风险溢价的影响研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(10): 156-164.
[3]	周晓光,官玥,黄晓霞. 文化创意产业债务融资结构的影响因素研究——基于2012～2016年上市公司的面板数据[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(12): 125-132.
[4]	刘洪久, 胡彦蓉, 马卫民, 孙伟国. 产业生命周期视角下的并购期权价值评估方法优化研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(1): 31-36.
[5]	王正位, 朱武祥, 赵冬青. 股权融资管制与公司资本结构:模型与模拟[J]. 运筹与管理, 2016, 25(1): 158-165.
[6]	卢荣花, 李南. 基于产品生命周期的闭环供应链定价和协调策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(6): 112-120.
[7]	黄梅萍, 汪贤裕. 基于代理成本的供应链利润分配研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2013, 22(5): 51-61.
[8]	何建佳, 徐福缘, 马庆国, 何胜学, 董琼. 短生命周期产品供应链清仓收入共享契约研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2013, 22(5): 62-68.