考虑可信度和优先级的对偶犹豫模糊多属性决策在绿色审计中的应用研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2022.0332

运筹与管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10): 147-153.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2022.0332

考虑可信度和优先级的对偶犹豫模糊多属性决策在绿色审计中的应用研究

曲国华^1,2, 张潇丹^1,3, 曲卫华^{4, 5}

1.山西财经大学管理科学与工程学院,山西太原 030006;
2.山西财经大学博雅学院,山西太原 030012;
3.华北电力大学经济与管理学院,北京 102206;
4.山西大学管理与决策研究所,山西太原 030006;
5.山西大学经济与管理学院,山西太原 030006

收稿日期:2021-04-15 出版日期:2022-10-25 发布日期:2022-11-14
作者简介:曲国华(1982-),男(汉族),山西财经大学,副教授,主要研究方向:大数据决策,环境审计与决策;曲卫华(1982-),男,山西大学,教授,博士,博士生导师,主要研究方向:金融大数据决策、低碳健康经济;张潇丹(1999-),女,华北电力大学,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:大数据决策,绿色供应链。
基金资助:
国家哲学社会科学基金后期资助项目,中国情境下第三方国际环境审计驱动企业环境行为的形成机理及演化机制研究(21FGLB043)

Research on the Model of Corporate Environmental Behavior Based on Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Considering Credibility And Priority

QU Guo-hua^1,2, ZHANG Xiao-dan^1,3, QU Wei-hua^{4, 5}

1. School of Management Science and Engineering, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China;
2. School of Liberal Arts, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030012, China;
3. School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Changping District, Beijing 102206, China;
4. Institute of Management and decision,Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China;
5. School of Economics and Management, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China

Received:2021-04-15 Online:2022-10-25 Published:2022-11-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对目前专家和属性对于方案比选的重要性致使企业迫切需要将其定量化分析的问题,以及企业环境行为中公司需要承担环保责任,在绿色采购方面要将环境属性引入供应商比选标准的问题,本文提出了考虑专家可信度和属性优先级的对偶犹豫模糊多属性决策方法,将专家对于该领域的熟悉程度及所选属性的重要程度融入到供应商的绿色评估指标定量化分析与评选中。结合对偶犹豫模糊集的隶属度与非隶属度,给出了对偶犹豫模糊熵值、混合平均算子和混合几何算子的计算模型与该方法模型的具体步骤,通过对某企业绿色审计在内的四种属性进行评估来选择最佳供应商的实例,验证了此模型的可行性和有效性。

关键词: 可信度, 优先级, 绿色审计, 企业环境行为, 对偶犹豫模糊熵值, 多属性决策方法

Abstract: This article aims at the problem that the importance of experts and attributes for scheme comparison and selection makes enterprises urgently need to make quantitative analysis. In addition, the company needs to bear the environmental responsibility in the environmental behavior of enterprises, and the environmental attribute should be introduced into the supplier comparison standard in the aspect of green procurement. In this paper, a dual hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making method considering expert credibility and attribute priority is proposed, which integrates experts’ familiarity with the field and the importance of the selected attributes into the quantitative analysis and selection of suppliers’ green evaluation index. Combined with the membership and non-membership of dual hesitant fuzzy sets, the calculation models of dual hesitant fuzzy entropy, mixed average operator and mixed geometric operator and the specific steps of this method model are given. The feasibility and effectiveness of this model are verified by evaluating four attributes including green audit of an enterprise to select the best supplier.

Key words: credibility, priority, green audit, corporate environmental behavior, dual hesitant fuzzy entropy value, multiple attribute decision making method

中图分类号:

C931

曲国华, 张潇丹, 曲卫华. 考虑可信度和优先级的对偶犹豫模糊多属性决策在绿色审计中的应用研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(10): 147-153.

QU Guo-hua, ZHANG Xiao-dan, QU Wei-hua. Research on the Model of Corporate Environmental Behavior Based on Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Considering Credibility And Priority[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2022, 31(10): 147-153.

参考文献

[1] 芦慧,庄颜嫣,韩钰.内外部价值整合视角下企业环境行为结构构建与现状研究[J].软科学,2020,34(04):90-97.
[2] 曲国华,杨柳,曲卫华,李巧梅.第三方国际环境审计下考虑政府监管与公众监督策略选择的演化博弈研究[J].中国管理科学,2021,29(04):225-236.
[3] Andreou Panayiotis C, and Kellard Neil M. Corporate environmental proactivity: evidence from the european union’s emissions trading system[J]. British Journal of Management, 2020, 32(3): 630-647.
[4] Han Lin, Saixing Zeng, Liangyan Wang, Hailiang Zou, Hanyang Ma. How does environmental irresponsibility impair corporate reputation? a multi-method investigation[J]. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2016, 23(6): 413-423.
[5] 王宇露,江华.企业环境行为研究理论脉络与演进逻辑探析[J].外国经济与管理,2012,34(8):26-34,42.
[6] 曲国华,刘雪,李月娇,曲卫华,李世宇,张强.政府监管与企业加入第三方国际环境审计的模糊博弈分析[J].中国管理科学,2020,28(01):113-121.
[7] 蔡春,郑开放,陈晔,王朋.政府环境审计对企业环境责任信息披露的影响研究——基于“三河三湖”环境审计的经验证据[J].审计研究,2019(06):3-12.
[8] 王爱国,张志.环境审计服务生态文明建设的理论探讨[J].审计研究,2019(02):43-47.
[9] 于连超,张卫国,毕茜,董晋亭.政府环境审计会提高企业环境绩效吗?[J].审计与经济研究,2020,35(01):41-50.
[10] Tirkolaee Erfan Babaee, Dashtian Zahra, Weber Gerhard Wilhelm, Tomaskova Hana, Soltani Mehdi, Mousavi Nasim Sadat. An integrated decision-making approach for green supplier selection in an agri-food supply chain: threshold of robustness worthiness[J]. Mathematics, 2021, 9(11): 9-10.
[11] Niranjan T, Singaravel B, Srinivasulu Raju S. Integrated fuzzy criteria evaluation with metaheuristic optimization for green supplier selection and order allocation[J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2021, 1057(1): 325-337.
[12] Zhu B, Xu Z, Xia M. Dual hesitant fuzzy sets[J]. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2012, 2012(1): 2607-2645.
[13] YANG Shanghong, JU Yanbing. Multi-attribute decision-making method based on dual hesitant fuzzy linguistic variables[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2015, 24(05): 91-96.
[14] WANG Jinying, HAN Xiaobing. Distance measures for interval-valued dual hesitant fuzzy sets and its application to multi-attribute decision making[J]. Journal of Liaoning University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 35(06): 359-364.
[15] Zhao N, Xu Z. Entropy measures for dual hesitant fuzzy information[J]. International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies, 2015, 32(1): 1152-1156.
[16] 俞锦涛,王金山,马海宁.基于双向投影的区间对偶犹豫模糊信息多属性决策方法[J].江苏师范大学学报(自然科学版),2018,36(03):63-68.
[17] 闫菲菲,魏翠萍,葛淑娜.对偶犹豫模糊集的熵及在多属性决策中的应用[J].数学的实践与认识,2018,48(17):9.
[18] 李丽颖,苏变萍.基于区间值对偶犹豫模糊集的多属性决策方法[J].模糊系统与数学,2017,31(5):95-100.
[19] Wang H, Zhao X, Wei G. Dual hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making[J]. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2014, 26(5): 2281-2290.
[20] Chao JIANG, Shenqing JIANG, Jianlan CHEN. Interval-valued dual hesitant fuzzy hamacher aggregation operators for multiple attribute decision making[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Information, 2019, 7(03): 227-256.
[21] 戚筱雯,梁昌勇,张俊岭.基于双边犹豫模糊非均衡语言优先集成算子的应急响应预案评估方法[J].运筹与管理,2022,31(05):8-13.
[22] Wei G. Hesitant fuzzy prioritized operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2012, 31(1): 176-182.
[23] Xia M, Xu Z, Chen N. Induced aggregation under confidence levels[J]. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 2011, 19(02): 201-227.
[24] 阮传扬,杨建辉.考虑可信度和优先级的犹豫模糊信息集成算子[J].系统工程与电子技术,2016,38(10):7.
[25] 曲国华,张汉鹏,刘增良,张振华,张强.基于直觉模糊λ-Shapley Choquet积分算子TOPSIS的多属性群决策方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2016,36(03):726-742.
[26] 程紫薇,杨志辉,王斌斌.基于区间对偶犹豫模糊语言变量的VR在线购房顾客需求分析[J].南昌大学学报(理科版),2020,44(05):421-429,438.
[27] 曲国华,许岩,曲卫华,张强.基于区间对偶犹豫模糊信息双向投影技术的双边公平匹配决策方法[J].系统科学与数学,2021,41(05):1256-1275.
[28] 李晓星,杜军凯,傅尧.基于结构熵权-模糊综合评价的企业环境绩效审计模型构建[J].企业经济,2018,37(02):102-107.

考虑可信度和优先级的对偶犹豫模糊多属性决策在绿色审计中的应用研究

Research on the Model of Corporate Environmental Behavior Based on Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Considering Credibility And Priority

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张子健, 何清. 产品显性防伪技术(OACT)投资的供应链决策机制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6): 67-73.
[2]	金秀, 李鹤. 考虑投资者异质信念和目标优先级的投资组合问题研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(1): 183-189.
[3]	刘政敏, 徐洪雪, 刘培德, 梁霞. 考虑多元关联关系和语义变换的直觉不确定语言多属性决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(2): 45-52.
[4]	王馨恬, 羌锐, 张勇. 城市医疗急救绩效分析研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 150-157.
[5]	崔春生, 朱向琳, 任亚丹, 祝晓梦. 考虑可信度的犹豫模糊多属性决策方法研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(6): 19-24.
[6]	张建同, 杨文娟. 基于优先级的进离港航班排序优化问题研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(6): 115-121.
[7]	任宗伟, 郭海妮. 考虑患者回诊情况下的门诊科室调度优化[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(4): 39-49.
[8]	轩华, 刘静, 李冰. 工件优先级图为非连接图且含环的单机总加权拖期调度问题[J]. 运筹与管理, 2014, 23(2): 244-249.
[9]	王洁方. 灰变量逆DEA模型的初步研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2013, 22(2): 129-134.
[10]	张晓, 樊治平. 一种基于证据推理的多指标多标度大群体决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2011, 20(2): 15-20.