考虑多种类型缺陷的软件可靠性模型研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2022.0120

运筹与管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 104-108.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2022.0120

考虑多种类型缺陷的软件可靠性模型研究

邱慧¹, 闫相斌², 彭锐³

1.运城学院经济管理系,山西运城 044000;
2.北京科技大学经济管理学院,北京 100083;
3.北京工业大学经济管理学院,北京 100022

收稿日期:2020-06-13 出版日期:2022-04-25 发布日期:2022-05-13
作者简介:邱慧(1982-),女,河北人,博士,讲师,研究方向为系统可靠性,电子商务数据分析。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71531013);山西省哲学社会科学规划课题(2020YY253)

Research on Software Reliability Model Considering Multiple Types of Faults

QIU Hui¹, YAN Xiang-bin², PENG Rui³

1. Department of Economic Management, Yuncheng University, Shanxi province, 044000, China;
2. School of Economics & Management, University of Science & Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China;
3. School of Economics & Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100022, China

Received:2020-06-13 Online:2022-04-25 Published:2022-05-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文提出一种考虑多种类型缺陷的软件可靠性模型,并构建了缺陷检测和剔除两个过程的模型。具体分类情况,可以根据模型的检验方法(拟合准则和预测有效性度量)和模型复杂度来具体决定,如果有测试人员的分类建议或者分类数据,可以结合模型共同决定。为了说明问题,本文给出四种类型缺陷的具体模型,并对实际数据集进行了拟合。通过模型比较,验证了多种类型缺陷模型的有效性。最后,通过构建软件最优发布时间策略对模型进行了应用。研究结果为软件开发和测试提供了理论参考。

关键词: 软件可靠性, 缺陷检测过程, 缺陷剔除过程, 软件发布时间, 调试延迟

Abstract: This paper proposes a software reliability model that considers multiple types of defects, and proposes a model for the two processes of defect detection and elimination. The specific classification situation can be specifically determined according to the model's test method (fitting criteria and predictive validity measurement) and model complexity. If there is a tester's classification suggestion or classification data, it can be determined jointly with the model. In order to illustrate the problem, specific models of four types of defects are given, and actual data sets are fitted. Through model comparison, the validity of multiple types of defect models is verified. Finally, the model is applied by constructing the optimal software release time strategy. The research results provide a theoretical reference for software development and testing.

Key words: software reliability, fault detection process, fault correction process, software release time, debugging delay

中图分类号:

O213.2

邱慧, 闫相斌, 彭锐. 考虑多种类型缺陷的软件可靠性模型研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(4): 104-108.

QIU Hui, YAN Xiang-bin, PENG Rui. Research on Software Reliability Model Considering Multiple Types of Faults[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2022, 31(4): 104-108.

参考文献

[1] 杨剑锋,胡文生.考虑用户行为和排错延迟的多版本软件可靠性增长模型[J].系统工程理论与实践,2020,40(01):262-272.
[2] 毕翔,吴志雄,刘征宇,陆阳.基于加权多维隶属度函数的软件可靠性模糊评估[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2017,40(11):1483-1488.
[3] 王爱珍,吕勋.基于非完美调试和测试工作量的软件可靠性研究[J].系统仿真学报,2018,30(7):2593-2599,2607.
[4] Cinque M, Cotroneo D, Pecchia A, Pietrantuono R, Russo S. Debugging-workflow-aware software reliability growth analysis[J]. Software Testing Verification & Reliability, 2017,27 (7): e1638.
[5] Chatterjee S, Shukla A. Modeling and analysis of software fault detection and correction process through weibull-type fault reduction factor, change point and imperfect debugging[J]. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2016, 41(12): 5009-5025.
[6] Okamura H, Dohi T, Osaka S. Software reliability growth models with normal failure time distributions[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2013,116; 135-141.
[7] Peng R, Li Y F, Zhang W J, Hu Q P. Testing effort dependent software reliability model for imperfect debugging process considering both detection and correction[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2014, 126: 37-43.
[8] Liu Y, Li D, Wang L, Hu Q. A general modeling and analysis framework for software fault detection and correction process[J]. Software Testing Verification & Reliability, 2016, 26(5): 351-365.
[9] Kapur P K and Garg R B. A software reliability growth model for error detection phenomenon[J]. Software Engineering Journal, 1992, 7(4): 291-294.
[10] Yamada S, Osaki S, Narihisa H. A software reliability growth model with two types of errors[J]. RAIRO-Operations Research, 1985, 19.1: 87-104.
[11] Kimura M, Yamada S, Osaki S. Software reliability assessment for an exponential-S-shaped reliability growth phenomenon[J]. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 1992, 24(1-2): 71-78.
[12] Kapur P K, Anand A, Singh O, Hoda M N. Modeling successive software up-gradations with faults of different severity[J]. Proceedings of the 5th national conference, INDIACom, 2011.351-356.
[13] Verma R, Parihar R S, Das S. Modeling software multi up-gradations with error generation and fault severity[J]. International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences, 2018, 3(4): 429-437.
[14] Kapur P K, Younes S. Software reliability growth model with error dependency[J]. Microelectronics Reliability, 1995, 35(2): 273-278.

考虑多种类型缺陷的软件可靠性模型研究

Research on Software Reliability Model Considering Multiple Types of Faults

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	兑红炎, 李玥, 白光晗. 一种面向可靠性的改进不确定性重要度分析方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(3): 100-104.
[2]	秦红志, 孙明娟, 王伟伟, 董庆来. 二元性能相关多阶段退化系统可靠性建模与分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(3): 105-111.
[3]	高雷阜, 李伟梅. 基于Expectile和Realized GARCH模型的波动率预测[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(2): 99-103.
[4]	董晓芳, 张良勇. 产品可靠寿命的最优排序集挑选设计[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(10): 53-56.
[5]	赵斐, 康建设, 王雷震, 张新辉, 张建. 考虑非周期检测的视情维修与备件订购联合策略优化[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(9): 31-37.
[6]	董晓芳, 张良勇. 排序集抽样下指数分布的产品可靠度研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(7): 99-104.
[7]	刘宝亮, 温艳清, 丰月姣. 修理设备和开关不完全可靠的温贮备可修系统的可靠性[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(10): 113-117.
[8]	梁丽丹. n个同型部件k个修理设备的冷贮备可修系统的可靠度研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(10): 118-124.
[9]	马瑞宏, 贾旭杰, 李玉杰. 面向危险、安全失效模式的安全保障系统Signature可靠性分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(6): 58-61.
[10]	李效虎, 刘克, 曹晋华. 寿命分布年龄性质研究的总结与展望[J]. 运筹与管理, 2014, 23(1): 1-6.
[11]	刘仁彬, 刘再明. 具有有限次休假的n部件串联系统可靠性分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2011, 20(2): 102-107.