不同环保意识视角下的DEA效率模型

运筹与管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (3): 202-208.

不同环保意识视角下的DEA效率模型

魏新强, 张宝生

中国石油大学工商管理学院,北京 102249

收稿日期:2013-10-05 出版日期:2014-03-25
作者简介:魏新强(1986-),男,河北衡水人,博士生,研究方向;能源系统工程;张宝生(1957-)男,吉林桦甸人,教授,博士生导师,研究方向:能源系统工程、能源战略与创新管理。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重大项目:基于中国石油安全视角的海外油气资源接替战略研究(ZD164);教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目:中国与全球油气资源重点区域合作研究(09JZD0038);北京市优博论文资助项目:能源系统DEA方法体系(20121141402)

The DEA Models Under Different Environmental Awareness Perspectives

WEI Xin-qiang, ZHANG Bao-sheng

School of Business Administration, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China

Received:2013-10-05 Online:2014-03-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： DEA在效率分析领域具有良好的应用,随着全球气候的不断恶劣和环境的逐渐破坏,公众环保意识不断增强,在进行相关效率研究时,非期望产出越来越受到重视。以非期望产出为主要研究点,根据社会对非期望产出指标的认识规律将环保意识分为五个不同阶段,并综合考虑每个意识阶段的特征,将环境指标变动能力,环境承载能力、环境负外部性参与度、外部环境政策管理及企业生产要求纳入DEA效率分析过程中,通过对目标函数和约束条件进行不同的改进和约束,构建了不同意识阶段的DEA效率分析模型,并探讨了各阶段模型的使用范围和相互关系。最后,选取一个实例进行试算,证明各DEA模型的可行性和有效性。

关键词: 管理科学, 效率模型, DEA, 不同环保意识阶段, 非期望产出

Abstract: The DEA model has been applied popularly to the field of the efficiency analysis. With the deterioration of the global climate and the destruction of the environment, public environmental awareness continues rising. As a result, the undesirable outputs tend to receiving more and more attention. For detailed analysis of the efficiency analysis in each case, the environmental awareness is divided into five different stages based on the law of cognition of the undesirable outputs. Given the main manifestations of each stage division, environment indicator changing capacity, environmental carrying capacity, environmental negative externalities, environmental policy management and enterprise production requirements are combined with efficiency analysis process respectively by adding constrains into traditional DEA models and improving the objective function of DEA models under different environmental awareness perspectives. Afterwards, the application range and the relationships between models are discussed. Finally, an example is chosen to illustrate the feasibility and effectiveness of DEA models.

Key words: management science, efficiency models, DEA, various environmental awareness stages, undesirable outputs

中图分类号:

N945.1

魏新强, 张宝生. 不同环保意识视角下的DEA效率模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2014, 23(3): 202-208.

WEI Xin-qiang, ZHANG Bao-sheng. The DEA Models Under Different Environmental Awareness Perspectives[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2014, 23(3): 202-208.

参考文献

[1] Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,.1978, 2(6): 429-444.
[2] Fare R, Grosskopf, S, Lovell C A K, Pasurka C, Multilateral Productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a nonparametric approach[J]. The Review of Economies and Statisties, 1989, 71(1): 90-98.
[3] 孙广生,冯宗宪,曾凡银.DEA在评价工业生产环境效率上的应用[J].安徽师范大学学报(自然科学版),2003,26(2):112-116.
[4] 王波,张群.环境约束下不同生产效率模型研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2002,(1):1-8.
[5] Yaisawarng S, Klein J. The effects of sulfur dioxide controls on productivity change in the U.S. electric power industry[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1994, 76(3): 447-460.
[6] Fare R, Grosskopf S, Tyteca D. An activity analysis model of the environmental performance of firms[Japplication to fossil-fuel-fired electric utilities[J]. Ecological Economics, 1996, 18(2): 161-175.
[7] Fare R, Grosskopf S. Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: comment[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 157(1): 242-245.
[8] Lee J D, Park J B, Kim T Y. Estimation of the shadow prices of pollutants with production/environment in efficiency taken into account: a nonparametric directional distance function approach[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2002, 64(4): 365-375.
[9] Yu M M, Measuring physical efficiency of domestic airports in taiwan with undesirable outputs and environmental factors[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2004, 10(5): 295-303.
[10] Zaim O. Measuring environmental performance of state manufacturing through changes in pollution intensities: a DEA framework[J]. Ecological Economies, 2004, 48(1): 37-47.
[11] Haynes K E, Ratick S. Cummings-Sexton J. Pollution prevention frontiers: a data envelopment simulation[C]. In: Knaup, GL., Kim, TJ.(Eds.), Environmental program Evaluation: A Primer. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1997.
[12] Reinhard S, Lovell C A K, Thijssen G J. Environmental efficiency with multiple environmentally detrimental variables: estimated with SFA and DEA[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2000, 121(2): 287-303.
[13] Hailu A, Veeman T S. Non-Parametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: an application to the Canadian pulp and paper industry[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economies, 2001, 83(3): 605-616.
[14] 王波,张群,王飞.考虑环境因素的企业DEA有效性分析[J].控制与决策,2002,17(l):24-28.
[15] 王波.产品环境影响评价理论与应用研究[D].北京:北京航空航天大学博士论文,2000.
[16] Zhu J, Chen Y. Assessing textile factory performance[J]. Journal of System Science and System Engineering, 1993(2): 119-133.
[17] Lovell,C A K, Pastor J T, Tumer J A. Measuring macroeconomic performance in the OECD: a comparison of european and non-european countries[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1995, 87(3): 507-518.
[18] 张启平,刘业政,刁翠霞.面向社会经济发展水平的钢铁生产效率DEA动态评价[J].系统工程理论与实践,2012,32(11):2577-2584.
[19] Seiofd L M, Zhu J. Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 142(1): 16-20.
[20] Ali A I, Seiford L M. Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis[J]. Operations Research Letters, 1990,9(6): 403-405.
[21] 曾珍香,顾培亮,张闽.DEA方法在可持续发展评价中的应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,2000,(8):114-119.