序数权重统一表示下的权重稳健性Hasse图分析

doi:10.12005/orms.2022.0330

运筹与管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10): 133-138.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2022.0330

序数权重统一表示下的权重稳健性Hasse图分析

岳立柱¹, 陆畅², 施光磊²

1.黄山学院经济管理学院,安徽黄山 245000;
2.辽宁工程技术大学管理科学与工程研究院,辽宁葫芦岛 125105

收稿日期:2020-01-29 出版日期:2022-10-25 发布日期:2022-11-14
作者简介:岳立柱(1976-),男,黑龙江省大庆人,副教授,博士,研究方向:决策理论与方法;陆畅(1998-),女,辽宁省朝阳人,硕士研究生,研究方向:公司治理。
基金资助:
辽宁省教育厅基金项目(LJ2020JCL028)

Analysis of Hasse Graphs with Uniform Representation of Ordinal Weights

YUE Li-zhu¹, LU Chang², SHI Guang-lei²

1. School of Economics and Management, Huangshan University, Huangshan 245000, China;
2. Institute of Management Science and Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Huludao 125105, China

Received:2020-01-29 Online:2022-10-25 Published:2022-11-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 认识多种序数赋权方法的共性,有助于摆脱方法选择困扰,增强其实用效果。首先以线性函数为目标函数,以权重关系构造约束条件,建立线性规划。在此基础上证明了任意权重均可由线性规划的极值点集来表示,揭示了序数权重实质上是极值点的加权线性组合。进一步针对赋权方法稳健性不足的问题,利用极值点构建偏序关系,通过Hasse图增强权重排序的稳健性。实例分析表明,尽管序数权重不同,但与偏序方法相结合,均能得到类似的分析结果。

关键词: 权重, 序数权重, 偏序集, Hasse图

Abstract: It is helpful to get rid of the puzzle of method selection and enhance its practical effect to recognize the commonness of several ordinal weighting methods. Firstly, linear programming is established by taking linear function as objective function and constructing constraint conditions with weight relation. On this basis, it is proved that any weight can be expressed by the set of extreme points of linear programming, and it is revealed that ordinal weight is essentially a weighted linear combination of extreme points. Furthermore, aiming at the problem of insufficient robustness of weighting method, the partial order relation is constructed by using extreme points, and the robustness of weight ranking is enhanced by Hasse graph. The example analysis shows that although the ordinal weights are different, the similar analysis results can be obtained by combining with the partial order method.

Key words: weight, ordinal weight, poset, Hasse diagram

中图分类号:

C934

岳立柱, 陆畅, 施光磊. 序数权重统一表示下的权重稳健性Hasse图分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(10): 133-138.

YUE Li-zhu, LU Chang, SHI Guang-lei. Analysis of Hasse Graphs with Uniform Representation of Ordinal Weights[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2022, 31(10): 133-138.

参考文献

[1] 赵萌,张晨曦,秦金磊,张冰.基于实验设计的概率语言权重信息多准则决策方法[J].运筹与管理,2021,30(01):50-56.
[2] 姜乐,刘红彬,曲双红.犹豫模糊语言多属性群决策方法及其应用[J].统计与决策,2020,36 (01):172-175.
[3] Barron F H. Selecting a best multiattribute alternative with partial information about attribute weights[J]. Acta Psychologica, 1992, 80(1-3): 91-103.
[4] Dawes R M, Corrigan B. Linear models in decision making[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1974, 81(2): 95-106.
[5] Edwards D A, Stillwell W G. A comparison of weight approximation techniques in muitiattribute utility decision making[J]. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 1981, 28(1): 62-77.
[6] Pierre L K, Alessio I. A note on using centroid weights in additive multi-criteria decision analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 277: 391-393.
[7] Kirkwood C W, Corner J L. The effectiveness of partial information about attribute weights for ranking alternatives in multi-attribute decision making[J]. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 1993, 54: 456-476.
[8] Dawes R M, Corrigan B. Linear models in decision making[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1974, 81(2): 95-106.
[9] Wainer H. Estimating coefficients in linear models: it don’t make no nevermind[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1976, 83: 213-217.
[10] Barron F H, Barrett B E. Decision quality using ranked attribute weights[J]. Management Science 1996, 42: 1515-23.
[11] Butler J, Olson D L. Comparison of centroid and simulation approaches for selection sensitivity analysis[J]. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 1999, 8(3): 146-161.
[12] Zardari N H, Ahmed K, Shirazi S M. Weighting methods and their effects on multi-criteria decision making model outcomes in water resources management[M]. Springer International Publishing, 2015.
[13] Mateos A, Jiménez-Martín A, Aguayo E A. Dominance intensity measuring methods in MCDM with ordinal relations regarding weights[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2014, 70: 26-32.
[14] Solymosi T, Dombi J. A method for determining the weights of criteria: the centralized weights[J]. European Journal of Operational Research ,1986, 26: 35-41.
[15] Newman J R. Differential weighting in multiattribute utility measurement: when it should not and when it does make a difference[J]. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 1977, 20(2): 312-325.
[16] 岳立柱,张志杰,闫艳.蕴含权重的偏序集多准则决策法[J].运筹与管理,2018,27(02):26-31.
[17] 岳立柱,李良琼.基于在线信息的群评价模型及其偏序集求解方法[J].运筹与管理,2019,28(03):111-117.
[18] Fattore M, Maggino F, Colombo E. From composite indicators to partial orders: evaluating socio-economic phenomena through ordinal data[M]. Quality of life in Italy, 2012.
[19] 范懿.一个有关哈斯图的解析方法[J].上海第二工业大学学报,2003,1(1):17-22.
[20] 岳立柱,施光磊,陆畅.综合评价结果稳健性的偏序集分析[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版),2021,40(01):90-96.
[21] Jong Hyen Kim, Byeong Seok Ahn. Extended VIKOR method using incomplete criteria weights[J]. Expert Systems With Applications, 2019, 126: 124-132.

序数权重统一表示下的权重稳健性Hasse图分析

Analysis of Hasse Graphs with Uniform Representation of Ordinal Weights

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	于娱, 朱卫未, 施琴芬. 含有偏好的DEA-BWM评价方法研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(9): 147-152.
[2]	程栋, 张静阳, 袁宇翔, 程发新. 基于区间意见的非对称最小成本共识决策问题研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(5): 43-48.
[3]	岳立柱, 陆畅, 张志杰. 综合评价模型的偏序集表示[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(5): 101-106.
[4]	易平涛, 王士烨, 李伟伟, 王露, 董乾坤. 基于先验信息和一维数据聚类的专家赋权方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(3): 31-37.
[5]	姜琳, 朱建军. 考虑双参照点和Choquet积分的新型研发机构绩效评估方法及应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(2): 141-147.
[6]	陈亮, 刘欣慧, 李春友. 商业银行财务绩效偏序集评价研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(1): 196-201.
[7]	陶玲玲, 尤天慧. 基于在线评价且考虑消费者类型的酒店排序方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(5): 122-128.
[8]	张伟平, 庄新田, 吴冬梅. 基于风险网络结构的资产分配策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(5): 161-167.
[9]	高雅, 岳立柱, 周志强. 权重可变条件下员工绩效排名稳健性的Hasse图分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(5): 208-213.
[10]	朱运霞, 昂胜, 杨锋. 基于SMAA和公共权重的决策单元效率评价与排序[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 184-189.
[11]	胡东滨, 谢玲. 基于云模型和证据推理的生态环境安全评价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(3): 130-136.
[12]	孔造杰, 李斌. 基于理想点-矢量投影法的创新需求权重确定方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(2): 108-121.
[13]	张飞, 岳立柱, 王国辉. 基于偏序集的PROMETHEE方法优化研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(1): 10-16.
[14]	吴伟, 顾丹. 基于偏序集的模糊互补矩阵次序一致性检验与调整[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(9): 85-90.
[15]	宫诚举, 易平涛, 郭亚军, 李伟伟. 考虑评价信息满意度的群体信息集结方法研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(6): 153-158.