运筹与管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 133-139.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2025.0053

• 理论分析与方法探讨 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑风险规避的制造商销售模式和平台自有品牌决策

吕禄丙, 赵海霞   

  1. 西南石油大学经济管理学院,四川成都 610500
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-20 出版日期:2025-02-25 发布日期:2025-06-04
  • 通讯作者: 赵海霞(1984-),女,江西九江人,副教授,博士,研究方向:供应链管理。Email: zhx00024@163.com。
  • 作者简介:吕禄丙(1997-),男,山东济南人,硕士研究生,研究方向:供应链管理
  • 基金资助:
    西南石油大学2021年人文社科专项基金杰出人才项目(2021RW035);国家自然科学基金资助项目(72072022)

Decision of Manufacturer's Selling Mode and Platform's Store Brand Considering Risk Aversion

LYU Lubing, ZHAO Haixia   

  1. School of Economics and Management, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
  • Received:2022-12-20 Online:2025-02-25 Published:2025-06-04

摘要: 基于风险规避制造商和风险中性平台组成的供应链,构建了制造商采用转售模式或代理模式时平台是否引入自有品牌的四种决策模型,运用博弈理论,识别了供应链成员的销售模式决策机制和自有品牌引入策略。研究表明:对于平台而言,转售模式有利于引入自有品牌,代理模式仅在佣金费率较低时适合引入自有品牌;消费者偏好自有品牌或制造商规避风险都不利于引入自有品牌。对于制造商而言,风险规避程度越高,越倾向于采用代理模式;在自身趋于风险中性和消费者对不同品牌偏好差异较大时,难以阻止平台引入自有品牌,除此之外,只要佣金费率适中,即可通过采用代理模式来阻止平台引入自有品牌。最后,本文拓展了消费者更偏好自有品牌的决策分析,发现消费者自有品牌偏好对博弈均衡的影响与基本模型相反。

关键词: 风险规避, 自有品牌, 转售模式, 代理模式

Abstract: Since its formation, e-commerce has achieved remarkable development results. With the rapid development of e-commerce, the platform, as an important carrier of online selling, has attracted great attention from enterprises. There are two main modes for enterprises to sell products through the platform: one is the reselling mode, that is, the platform buys products from upstream enterprises at the wholesale price and then resells them to consumers at the retail price, such as JD.com, Amazon and so on; the second is the agency mode, that is, upstream enterprises set the retail price and sell products directly to consumers, but need to pay a fixed percentage of revenue to the platform, such as Tmall. For enterprises looking to expand their business through the platform, the choice between two selling modes will be a top priority. Thus, it is necessary to analyze the influence mechanism of different selling mode on enterprise profits.
In the face of such a huge market, more and more platforms choose to introduce store brands and encroach on the market to improve their own profits and bargaining power. Behind the rise in e-commerce and store brand is the increase in consumer purchasing power, which makes consumers more inclined to buy diversified and personalized products and show obvious preference differences for different products, which increases the uncertainty of product demand. At the same time, new brands in the market will intensify market competition. Hence, manufacturers often adopt a risk-averse attitude to cope with volatile markets and this attitude to risk can have a significant impact on the manufacturer's decisions. On the other hand, platforms' store brand strategy as an additional profit channel can also be used as a means to regulate the sales of national brands. Besides, multiple profit sources improve platforms' resilience in the face of demand fluctuations. Hence, this paper assumes that the platform is a risk-neutral enterprise.
This paper considers a supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and a retail platform. Among them, the manufacturer is risk-averse and sells the national brand product on the platform through the reselling mode or agency mode. The retail platform is risk-neutral and can choose to introduce the store brand product. This paper divides all decisions into long-term and short-term decisions. In the long-term decision-making phase, the manufacturer first decides to adopt the reselling mode or the agency mode. The platform then decides whether to introduce the store brand. In the short-term decision-making phase, the manufacturer first decides on the wholesale price or retail price of the national brand. The platform then decides on the retail price of the store brand and the national brand, or only the retail price of the store brand. In each scenario, the market demand for different products is derived according to the consumer's utility estimation of different products, the uncertain demand function of the market is constructed in the form of market demand plus random variables, the utility function of the risk-averse manufacturer is constructed by means-variance theory, and the optimal solution in each scenario is obtained by reverse induction. The main questions discussed are as follows: (1)When should the platform introduce the store brand? (2)Can the manufacturer prevent the platform from introducing the store brand by adopting specific selling modes? (3)How do the manufacturer's risk aversion, consumers' store brand preference, and commission rate affect the decisions of the manufacturer and the platform?
The results show that, for the platform, the reselling mode is conducive to the introduction of the store brand, while the agency mode is only suitable for the introduction of store brand when the commission rate is low. Consumers' preference for the store brand and the manufacturer's risk aversion are harmful for the platform to introduce the store brand. For the manufacturer, the higher the degree of risk aversion, the more likely it is to adopt the agency mode. When the manufacturer tends to be risk-neutral and consumers have quite different preference for different brands, it is difficult for the manufacturer to prevent the platform from introducing the store brand; besides, as long as the commission rate is moderate, the manufacturer can prevent the platform from introducing the store brand by adopting the agency mode. Finally, this paper extends the decision-making analysis when consumers prefer the store brand, and finds that the impact of consumers' store brand preference on game equilibrium is contrary to the basic model.

Key words: risk aversion, store brand, reselling mode, agency mode

中图分类号: