基于不同融资方式的双渠道供应链定价决策

doi:10.12005/orms.2019.0073

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对由一个制造商和一个有资金约束零售商组成的双渠道供应链系统,利用Stackelberg博弈模型,研究零售商分别选择银行贷款和延迟支付解决资金约束问题时,不同定价方案中制造商和零售商的最优决策,分析零售渠道市场份额以及融资利率对决策结果的影响。研究表明:零售商的资金不足不会改变各参与方最优决策随零售渠道市场份额的变化趋势。在双渠道不统一定价方案下,若选择银行贷款,只有零售渠道市场份额较小且利率较高时,直销价格随利率的增加而增加;若申请延迟支付,零售价格和直销价格不受利率影响。在双渠道统一定价方案下,销售价格只有在零售渠道市场份额较低时随银行贷款利率的增加而增加,与延迟支付利率无关。

关键词: 双渠道供应链, 供应链金融, 定价方案, Stackelberg博弈模型

Abstract: We consider a dual-channel supply chain with one manufacture as the leader, and one budget constraint retailer as the follower. We obtain the optimal pricing decisions by building Stackelberg game models on the basis of different pricing schemes when the retailer respectively uses bank credit and delay in payment to solve the funding problem, and then analyze the impacts of retail market share and interest rates on the results. We find that, the variation tendency of decision outcomes with the retail market share is consistent with different financing methods. When the prices in dual channel are not unified, the direct price will increase with the interest rate of bank loan if the retail market share is relatively large and the interest rate is relatively high. Meanwhile, the retail price and the direct price are not affected by the interest rate of delay in payment. When the prices of dual channel are unified, the selling price will increase with the interest rate of bank loan if the retail market share is relatively small. Also, it is not associated with the interest rate of delay in payment.

Key words: dual-channel supply chain, supply chain financing, pricing scheme, Stackelberg game model

中图分类号:

F252

史思雨,孙静春. 基于不同融资方式的双渠道供应链定价决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(4): 1-8.

SHI Si-yu, SUN Jing-chun. Pricing Decisions of Dual-channel Supply Chain Based on Different Financing Methods[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(4): 1-8.

参考文献

[1] 国家统计联网直报门户.2017.2016年中国中小企业运行报告.2019-02-05,http://www.lwzb.gov.cn/pub/gjtjlwzb/sjyfx/201705/t20170524_3750.html.
[2] 胡跃飞,黄少卿.供应链金融:背景、创新与概念界定[J].金融研究,2009(8):76-82.
[3] 陈祥锋.资金约束供应链中违约风险与融资均衡研究[J].复旦学报(自然科学版),2016,55(5):543-552.
[4] Yan N, Sun B, Zhang H, et al. A partial credit guarantee contract in a capital-constrained supply chain: financing equilibrium and coordinating strategy[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2016, 173: 122-133.
[5] Buzacott J A, Zhang R Q. Inventory management with asset-based financing[J]. Management Science, 2004, 50(9): 1274-1292.
[6] Dada M, Hu Q. Financing newsvendor inventory[J]. Operations Research Letters, 2008, 36(5): 569-573.
[7] 杜文意,唐小我,艾兴政,等.考虑努力因素影响需求的供应链外源融资策略[J].系统管理学报,2017(5):964-969.
[8] Haley C W, Higgins R C. Inventory policy and trade credit financing[J]. Management Science, 1973, 20(4-part-i): 464-471.
[9] Goyal S K. Economic order quantity under conditions of permissible delay in payments[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1985, 36(4): 335-338.
[10] Ouyang L Y , Teng J T , Goyal S K , et al. An economic order quantity model for deteriorating items with partially permissible delay in payments linked to order quantity[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 194(2): 418-431.
[11] Ting P S. Comments on the EOQ model for deteriorating items with conditional trade credit linked to order quantity in the supply chain management[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2015, 246(1): 108-118.
[12] Chiang W Y K, Chhajed D, Hess J D. Direct marketing, indirect profits: a strategic analysis of dual-channel supply-chain design[J]. Management Science, 2003, 49(1): 1-20.
[13] Chen J, Zhang H, Sun Y. Implementing coordination contracts in a manufacturer Stackelberg dual-channel supply chain[J]. Omega, 2012, 40(5): 571-583.
[14] 王虹,孙玉玲,周晶.制造商信息私有条件下的双渠道供应链定价决策[J].运筹与管理,2013(6):117-122.
[15] Soleimani F, Khamseh A A, Naderi B. Optimal decisions in a dual-channel supply chain under simultaneous demand and production cost disruptions[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2016, 243(1-2): 301-321.
[16] 肖肖,骆建文.面向资金约束制造商的双渠道供应链融资策略[J].系统管理学报,2016,25(1):121-128.
[17] Cattani K, Gilland W, Heese H S, et al. Abstract boiling frogs: pricing strategies for a manufacturer adding a direct channel that competes with the traditional channel[J]. Production & Operations Management, 2006, 15(1): 40-56.
[18] Lu Q, Liu N. Pricing games of mixed conventional and e-commerce distribution channels[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2013, 64(1): 122-132.
[19] Li B, Chen P, Li Q, et al. Dual-channel supply chain pricing decisions with a risk-averse retailer[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2014, 52(23): 7132-7147.
[20] Ding Q, Dong C, Pan Z. A hierarchical pricing decision process on a dual-channel problem with one manufacturer and one retailer[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2016, 175: 197-212.
[21] Yan R. Managing channel coordination in a multi-channel manufacturer-retailer supply chain[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2011, 40(4): 636-642.
[22] Lei M, Liu H, Deng H, et al. Demand information sharing and channel choice in a dual-channel supply chain with multiple retailers[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2014, 52(22): 6792-6818.
[23] Panda S, Modak N M, Sana S S, et al. Pricing and replenishment policies in dual-channel supply chain under continuous unit cost decrease[J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2015, 256: 913-929.