考虑需求和质量双重风险的动力电池回收定价策略和协调机制研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2020.0107

运筹与管理 ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 195-203.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2020.0107

考虑需求和质量双重风险的动力电池回收定价策略和协调机制研究

卢超¹, 赵梦园¹, 陶杰², 刘晨光³, 余江^4,5

1.上海大学管理学院,上海 200444;
2.上海理工大学管理学院,上海 200093;
3.西北工业大学管理学院,陕西西安 710072;
4.中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院,北京 100190;
5.中国科学院大学公共政策与管理学院,北京 100049

收稿日期:2018-06-23 出版日期:2020-04-25
作者简介:卢超(1986-),男,山东泰安人,副教授、硕士生导师,管理学博士,研究方向为管理理论与方法、创新管理与政策。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71704101,71601117,71371153,71671139,71834006);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(17YJC630094);上海市“科技创新行动计划”软科学研究计划重点项目(18692108300)

Pricing Strategy and Coordination Mechanism of Power Battery Recycling under the Dual Risks from Demand and Quality

LU Chao¹, ZHAO Meng-yuan¹, TAO Jie², LIU Chen-guang³, YU Jiang^4,5

1. School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China;
2. Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China;
3. School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China;
4. Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
5. School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2018-06-23 Online:2020-04-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 合理的定价策略和有效的协调机制是保障即将大量报废的动力电池实现回收利用的重要手段。本文同时考虑动力电池回收利用中来自市场的需求风险和来自回收渠道的质量风险,构建了两阶段逆向供应链分散式和集中式定价模型,发现分散决策下的最优回收价格始终低于集中决策下的最优回收价格,逆向供应链存在双重边际化现象;进一步,基于风险共享契约提出完全补偿契约来协调供应链,从而使供应链成员实现帕累托改进,并结合具体算例提出了相应的建议。

关键词: 动力电池回收, 需求风险, 质量风险, 供应链协调

Abstract: A reasonable pricing strategy and an effective coordination mechanism play important roles in the recycling and utilization of power batteries. By taking both demand risk (from the market side) and quality risk (from the recycle channel) during power battery's recycling and utilization into consideration, this paper constructs a two-stage reverse supply chain decentralized and centralized pricing model, and finds that the optimal recycling price under decentralized decision is always lower than that under centralized decision, and there is a double marginalization phenomenon in the reverse supply chain. Further, a risk sharing contract based complete compensation contract is proposed to coordinate the supply chain, which could help supply chain members to realize Pareto improvement. In addition, some suggestions are proposed through a concrete example analysis.

Key words: power battery recycling, demand risk, quality risk, supply chain coordination

中图分类号:

F272.3

卢超, 赵梦园, 陶杰, 刘晨光, 余江. 考虑需求和质量双重风险的动力电池回收定价策略和协调机制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(4): 195-203.

LU Chao, ZHAO Meng-yuan, TAO Jie, LIU Chen-guang, YU Jiang. Pricing Strategy and Coordination Mechanism of Power Battery Recycling under the Dual Risks from Demand and Quality[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(4): 195-203.

参考文献

[1] 陶志军,贾晓峰.中国动力电池回收利用产业商业模式研究[J].汽车工业研究,2018,10:33-42.
[2] Denizel M, Ferguson M, Souza G G C. Multiperiod remanufacturing planning with uncertain quality of inputs[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2010, 57(3): 394-404.
[3] He Y J. Supply risk sharing in a closed-loop supply chain[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2017, 183: 39-52.
[4] Govindan K, Soleimani H, Kannan D. Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: a comprehensive review to explore the future[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2015, 240(3): 603-626.
[5] Krapp M, Nebel J, Sahamie R. Forecasting product returns in closed-loop supply chains[J]. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 2013, 43(8): 614-637.
[6] He Y J. Acquisition pricing and remanufacturing decisions in a closed-loop supply chain[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 163: 48-60.
[7] 韩小花,吴海燕,杨倩霞.成本与需求同时扰动下竞争型闭环供应链的生产与协调决策[J].系统管理学报,2016,25(3):546-555.
[8] Cai X Q, Lai M H, Li X, et al. Optimal acquisition and production policy in a hybrid manufacturing/remanufacturing system with core acquisition at different quality levels[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 233(2): 374-382.
[9] 高举红,滕金辉,侯丽婷,等.需求不确定下考虑竞争的闭环供应链定价研究[J].系统工程学报,2017,32(1):78-88.
[10] 闻卉,曹晓刚,陶建平,等.零售商价格领导权结构下考虑专利保护的闭环供应链定价策略[J].运筹与管理,2017,26(8):109-114.
[11] 冯章伟,肖条军,柴彩春.第三方回收商领导型两级闭环供应链的回收与定价策略[J].中国管理科学,2018,26(1):118-127.
[12] Kannan Govindan M E , Popiuc M N . Reverse supply chain coordination by revenue sharing contract: a case for the personal computers industry[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 233(2): 326-336.
[13] 李新然,宋志成,牟宗玉.考虑差别定价的闭环供应链协调应对突发事件研究[J].运筹与管理,2014,23(5):9-16.
[14] Inderfurth K, Clemens J. Supply chain coordination by risk sharing contracts under random production yield and deterministic demand[J]. OR Spectrum, 2014, 36(2): 525-556.
[15] Savaskan R C, Bhattacharya S, Luk N, et al. Closed-Loop supply Chain models with product remanufacturing[J]. Management Science, 2004, 50(2): 239-252.
[16] Gerchak Y, Vickson R G, Parlar M. Periodic review production models with variable yield and uncertain demand[J]. IIE Transactions, 1988, 20(2): 144-150.
[17] Yano C A, Lee H L. Lot sizing with random yields: a review[J]. Operation Research, 1995, 43(2): 331-334.
[18] He Y J, Zhang J. Random yield risk sharing in a two-level supply chain[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2008, 112(2): 769-781.

考虑需求和质量双重风险的动力电池回收定价策略和协调机制研究

Pricing Strategy and Coordination Mechanism of Power Battery Recycling under the Dual Risks from Demand and Quality

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	谭德庆, 陈雪甍. 资金约束下基于CVaR的供应链协调性研究与融资策略选择[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 40-46.
[2]	张川, 陈宇潇. 政府补贴下考虑规模效应的动力电池梯次利用闭环供应链决策与协调[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 72-77.
[3]	王威昊, 胡劲松. 线上结合线下的供应链动态服务与定价决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 84-91.
[4]	李小燕, 王道平. 碳交易机制下考虑竞争和信息非对称的供应链协调研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 47-52.
[5]	扈衷权, 田军, 沈奥, 冯耕中. 基于利润—CVaR的期权契约供应链协调[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(1): 13-22.
[6]	汪玉亭, 丰景春, 张可, 李明, 薛松. 基于SEIRS的建设工程质量风险传递模型及仿真研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(7): 214-221.
[7]	扈衷权, 田军, 冯耕中. 看涨期权契约与看跌期权契约对比分析研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(4): 221-229.
[8]	张云丰, 龚本刚, 桂云苗. 时滞变质品供应链的数量折扣协调模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(3): 99-106.
[9]	丁锋, 陈军, 陈超, 霍佳震. 基于差异化战略的跨境电商竞争策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(6): 33-40.
[10]	夏良杰,柳慧,张萌,原白云,李妍. 强制减排规制下基于碳减排利润增量分享契约的供应链协调研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(5): 92-98.
[11]	扈衷权,田军,冯耕中. 基于供应方生产能力的应急物资生产模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(4): 100-108.
[12]	汪峻萍, 姚大庆, 闵杰. 顾客策略行为下基于联合促销努力的风险规避供应链协调模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(10): 50-56.
[13]	张学龙, 王军进, 刘家国. 价格和服务双因素影响的供应链协调决策模型研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(9): 57-65.
[14]	徐春秋. 基于减排成本共担期权契约的供应链协调[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(7): 20-27.
[15]	王占海, 梁工谦. 存货质押融资模式下的供应链协调[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(6): 122-130.