A Quantitative Research on the Matching Status of Relationship Governance(RG)and Contractual Governance Orientation(CG)

doi:10.12005/orms.2019.0020

Operations Research and Management Science ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 158-165.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2019.0020

• Application Research • Previous Articles Next Articles

A Quantitative Research on the Matching Status of Relationship Governance(RG)and Contractual Governance Orientation(CG)

FENG Jing-chun^1,2, ZHENG Chuan-bin^1,3,4, LU Qian-qian⁵, XUE Song^1,6

1.Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China;
2.Jiangsu Provincial Collaborative Innovation Center of World Water Valley and Water Ecological Civilization, Nanjing 211100, China;
3.Institute of Project Management of Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China;
4.Business School, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China;
5.Children’s Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215025, China;
6.International River Research Centre of Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China

Received:2017-07-06 Online:2019-01-25

关系治理与契约治理导向匹配状态的量化研究——以公私合作模式下A地铁项目为例

丰景春^1,2, 郑传斌^1,3,4, 鹿倩倩⁵, 薛松^1,6

1.河海大学商学院,江苏南京 211100;
2.江苏省“世界水谷”与水生态文明协同创新中心,江苏南京 211100;
3.河海大学项目管理研究所,江苏南京 211100;
4.苏州科技大学商学院,江苏苏州 215009;
5.苏州大学附属儿童医院,江苏苏州 215025;
6.河海大学国际河流研究中心,江苏南京 211100

通讯作者: 郑传斌(1988-)通讯作者,男,江苏徐州人,助理研究员、博士,研究方向:工程管理与项目管理
作者简介:丰景春(1963-),男,浙江金华人,教授、博士生导师,研究方向:工程管理与项目管理;鹿倩倩(1988-),女,江苏徐州人,硕士研究生,研究方向:工程管理与项目管理;薛松(1980-),男,安徽淮南人,讲师、博士,研究方向:工程管理与项目管理。
基金资助:
国家社科基金重点项目(14AZD024);国家社会科学基金青年项目(15CJL023);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(2015B06214,2014B09014,2015B08214,2016B03914);教育部创新团队(IRT13062);国际河流战略与情报监测研究,2014年。

Abstract

Abstract: The research into relational governance(RG)and contractual governance orientation(CG)has been the subject under discussion, but there is still a lack of quantitative research on the state of matching between RG and CG. Hence, based on the survey data, the relational weight method is used to quantify the state of RG and CG. What’s more, a matching model of RG and CG is constructed, and a case is studied. The research results show that it is feasible to quantify the research on the state of RG and CG, and to achieve a quantitative study of the best matching state between them. The conclusions are helpful to the understanding of the matching mechanism between RG and CG, which is of great theoretical and practical implication to the realization of the effective matching between them and improvement of the project performance.

Key words: relational governance, contractual governance orientation, matching, public-private-partnership

摘要： 近年来关系治理(RG)、契约治理导向(CG)是项目管理领域研究较多的议题,但是关于二者匹配状态的量化研究却很少。为此,基于问卷调研数据,利用相关性权重法对RG状态、CG状态进行了量化,在此基础上,构建了RG与CG匹配模型,并进行了案例分析。研究结果表明:对RG状态、CG状态的量化研究具有可行性,且实现了对RG与CG最佳匹配状态的量化研究。以上研究结论有助于理解RG与CG的匹配机理,对实现二者的有效匹配及项目绩效的改善具有重要的理论和实践指导意义。

关键词: 关系治理, 契约治理导向, 匹配, 公私合作模式

CLC Number:

F294

FENG Jing-chun, ZHENG Chuan-bin, LU Qian-qian, XUE Song. A Quantitative Research on the Matching Status of Relationship Governance(RG)and Contractual Governance Orientation(CG)[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(1): 158-165.

丰景春, 郑传斌, 鹿倩倩, 薛松. 关系治理与契约治理导向匹配状态的量化研究——以公私合作模式下A地铁项目为例[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(1): 158-165.

References

[1] Dyer J H, Singh H. The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of inter-organizational competitive advantage[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(4): 660-679.
[2] Poppo L, Zenger T. Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2002, 23(8): 707-725.
[3] Zou W, Kumaraswamy M, Chung J, et al. Identifying the critical success factors for relationship management in PPP projects[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2014, 32(2): 265-274.
[4] Claro D P, Hagelaar G, Omta O. The determinants of relational governance and performance: how to manage business relationships?[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2003, 32(8): 703-716.
[5] Ferguson R J, Paulin M, Bergeron J. Contractual governance, relational governance, and the performance of interfirm service exchanges: the influence of boundary-spanner closeness[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2005, 33(2): 217-234.
[6] Goo J, Kishore R, Rao H, et al. The role of service level agreements in relational management of information technology outsourcing: an empirical study[J]. Mis Quarterly, 2009, 33(1): 119-145.
[7] 苏琦,李新春.内部治理、外部环境与中国家族企业生命周期[J].管理世界,2004(10):85-96.
[8] 姜翰,杨鑫,金占明.战略模式选择对企业关系治理行为影响的实证研究——从关系强度角度出发[J].管理世界,2008(03):115-125.
[9] 万俊毅.准纵向一体化、关系治理与合约履行——以农业产业化经营的温氏模式为例[J].管理世界,2008(12):93-102.
[10] Cheung S, Wong W, Yiu T, et al. Developing a trust inventory for construction contracting[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2011, 29(3): 184-196.
[11] Farrell L M. Principal-agency risk in project finance[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2003(21): 547-561.
[12] Canato A, Ravasi D, Phillips N. Coerced practice implementation in cases of low cultural fit: cultural change and practice adaptation during the implementation of six sigma at 3m[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2013, 56(6): 1724-1753.
[13] 肖静华,谢康,冉佳森.缺乏IT认知情境下企业如何进行IT规划——通过嵌入式行动研究实现战略匹配的过程和方法[J].管理世界,2013(6):138-188.
[14] 张美丽,石春生,贾云庆.企业组织创新与技术创新匹配效应涌现机理研究[J].软科学,2013(06):44-47.
[15] Beal R M, Yasai-Ardekani M. Performance implications of aligning CEO functional experiences with competitive strategies[J]. Journal of Management, 2000, 26(4): 733-762.
[16] 冯米,路江涌,林道谧.战略与结构匹配的影响因素——以我国台湾地区企业集团为例[J].管理世界,2012(02):73-81.
[17] 王雁飞,朱瑜.组织社会化与员工行为绩效——基于个人—组织匹配视角的纵向实证研究[J].管理世界,2012(05):109-124.
[18] 贾建锋,唐贵瑶,李俊鹏,等.高管胜任特征与战略导向的匹配对企业绩效的影响[J].管理世界,2015(02):120-132.
[19] Suprapto M, Bakker H L M, Mooi H G, et al. How do contract types and incentives matter to project performance?[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2016, 34(6): 1071-1087.
[20] 梁永宽.项目管理中的合同治理与关系治理——基于建设项目业主与承包商的实证研究[D].广州:中山大学,2008.
[21] 陈帆.基于契约关系的PPP项目治理机制研究[D].长沙:中南大学,2010.
[22] 邓娇娇.公共项目契约治理与关系治理的整合及其治理机理研究[D].天津:天津大学,2013.
[23] 彭为,陈建国,伍迪,等.政府与社会资本合作项目利益相关者影响力分析——基于美国州立高速公路项目的实证研究[J].管理评论,2017(05):205-215.
[24] 欧纯智.政府与社会资本合作的善治之路——构建PPP的有效性与合法性[J].中国行政管理,2017(01):57-62.
[25] Chan J H L, Chan D W M, Chan A P C. Preferred risk allocation in target cost contracts in construction[J]. Facilities, 2011, 29(13/14): 542-562.
[26] Eriksson P E, Laan A. Procurement effects on trust and control in client-contractor relationships[J]. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2007, 14(4): 387-399.
[27] Wong P S P, Cheung S O. Structural equation model of trust and partnering success[J]. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2005, 21(2): 70-80.
[28] Sandelands E. Building supply chain relationships[J]. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 1994, 24(3): 43-48.
[29] Fischer K, Leidel K, Riemann A, et al. An integrated risk management system(IRMS)for PPP projects[J]. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 2010, 15(3): 260-282.
[30] Lancer P, Holzer M. Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: an empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation[J]. Public Administration Review, 2001, 61(6): 693-708.
[31] 王韬,张进华,刘华.基于二阶因子模型的企业战略绩效评价实证研究[J].情报杂志,2010(03):43-47.
[32] 李靖,石春生,刘微微.高技术企业组织创新与技术创新匹配状态的测度研究[J].管理工程学报,2011(04):172-177.

A Quantitative Research on the Matching Status of Relationship Governance(RG)and Contractual Governance Orientation(CG)

关系治理与契约治理导向匹配状态的量化研究——以公私合作模式下A地铁项目为例

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	XIANG Ting, LI Yan-feng. A Bi-objective Home Health Care Scheduling Problem: Based on Costs and Overtime [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(8): 233-239.
[2]	ZHANG Li-li, MA Dan-ni, LOU Yuan. A Two-sided Matching Decision Model Based on Advantage Sequences [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(3): 50-56.
[3]	LIN Hao, LIN Lan. A Type of Two-stage Assignment Problem [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(2): 97-101.
[4]	SONG Hua, YANG Xiao-ye. Research on Dynamic Discount Decision of Supply Chain Finance Based on Working Capital Information Matching Platform [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(12): 92-99.
[5]	BAI Zhao-yang, WANG Hao, WANG Shu-ting, LAN Tian-tian. Modeling of Seru Production System Formation Considering Product-Seru Matching [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(12): 212-219.
[6]	YUE Qi, ZHU Jia-gui. Two-sided Matching Decision Based on Triangular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Number Information [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(1): 57-62.
[7]	LIU Li, ZHANG Zai-sheng, WANG Zhe. Carbon Emission Reduction Technology Investment Decision Based on Two-SidedMatching-Dynamic Game [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(8): 20-26.
[8]	ZHANG Yao-jie, LI Jie-gang, SHI Ben-shan. How does canceling ST affect firm value and stock price [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(4): 212-220.
[9]	LIU Ju, YANG Qin, ZHOU Yong-wu, CAO Ce-jun. A Two-sided Matching Decision Model Considering Perception Satisfaction of Postgraduates and Supervisors [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(3): 16-26.
[10]	ZHANG Di, DAI Hong-jun, LIU Xiao-rui. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Two-sided Matching Method Considering Regret Aversion and Matching Aspiration [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(10): 132-139.
[11]	GAO Yu-xuan, DU Yue-ping, SUN Bing-zhen, WANG Rui. Matching Method for Medical Service Considering the Personalized Demand of Patients [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(4): 17-25.
[12]	QU Jia-li, HU Ben-yong, CHEN Xu. Optimization of Supply Chain with Put Option Contracts from Retailer [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(2): 23-29.
[13]	ZHANG Di, SUN Tao, CHEN Ye, WAN Liang-qi. Decision Making Method for Stable Two-sided Matching under Linguistic Preference Information [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(2): 60-66.
[14]	CHEN Xi, SUN Huan, LIANG Hai-ming. A Matching Method for Healthcare Service Supply and Demand Considering Patients' Appointment Behavior with Diversified Demand [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(2): 90-97.
[15]	LI Zhi-wen, MA Zhi-qiang, XIONG Qiang, TIAN Gang. Study on the Impact of Search Cost on B2B Transaction ——Analysis Based on Upstream Firms Searching [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2018, 27(2): 186-192.