Service Level Decision of Scientific Instrument Sharing Platform

doi:10.12005/orms.2021.0076

Operations Research and Management Science ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 65-70.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2021.0076

• Theory Analysis and Methodology Study • Previous Articles Next Articles

Service Level Decision of Scientific Instrument Sharing Platform

XIE Jia-ping^1,2, XIA Yu^3*, LIANG Ling⁴, LIU dan^1,2

1. School of Business Administration, Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics, Urumqi 830012, China;
2. College of Business, Shanghai University of Finance and Economic, Shanghai 200433, China;
3. School of Business, Nanjing University of Information and Science Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;
4. Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Change Management, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China

Received:2019-06-01 Online:2021-03-25

科研设备共享平台的配套服务水平决策

谢家平^1,2, 夏宇^3*, 梁玲⁴, 刘丹^1,2

1.新疆财经大学工商管理学院, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830012;
2.上海财经大学商学院, 上海 200433;
3.南京信息工程大学商学院, 江苏南京 210044;
4.上海对外经贸大学人工智能与变革管理研究院, 上海 201620

通讯作者: 夏宇(1990-), 男, 重庆市大足人, 讲师, 研究方向:运营管理。
作者简介:谢家平(1963-), 男, 四川安岳人, 教授, 博士生导师, 研究方向:绿色创新与新能源、生产运作与供应链管理等; 梁玲 (1978-) , 女, 四川资阳人, 副教授, 硕士生导师, 研究方向:服务运营管理、商业模式创新; 刘丹(1991-), 女, 湖南邵阳人, 博士研究生, 研究方向:供应链金融。
基金资助:
国家社科基金重大课题(20& ZD060); 国家社科基金重点项目(20AJY008); 中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目(2018M641947)

Abstract

Abstract: To deal with the problem of low scientific research conversion rate, scientific instrument sharing platforms emerge. These sharing platforms provide high-level service to increase the research efficiency of the customers while optimizing the allocations of scientific instrument resources. However, the increased service level may reduce the renting time of customers and hurt the efficiency of the sharing mechanism. To make a proper service level decision that balances service quality and the efficiency of instrument sharing mechanism, we introduce the service decision of the platform in the traditional double-sided sharing platform model. The results show that appropriate service level of the platform increases the efficiency of the society. If the commission rate of the platform is low, high service level increases the society welfare. A small amount of self-owned instrument of the platform increases the profit of the platform. However, excessive self-owned instrument hurts the efficiency of sharing mechanism.

Key words: sharing economics, double-sided market, social welfare, service decision, scientific innovation platform

摘要： 为解决我国科研转化率低的难题, 科研设备共享平台应运而生, 这类平台不仅可以优化科研设备的社会配置, 同时还可以通过提高服务水平进而提升设备的使用效率。然而服务水平的提升可能会导致用户设备租赁时间的减少, 从而可能导致设备共享机制的有效性得不到充分发挥。为了制定合理的服务水平, 以兼顾服务质量以及设备共享机制的有效性的双重目标, 本文在传统的双边共享平台模型中引入了平台的服务决策。研究发现:制定合理的服务水平可以提高社会效率; 当平台的租金分成比例较小时, 提高服务水平可以提高社会福利; 当平台设置的租赁价格较高时, 平台利润对服务水平的变化具有较强的敏感性; 平台持有少量自有设备可以在一定程度上增加收入, 但过量持有设备会导致共享机制的失灵。

关键词: 共享经济, 双边市场, 社会福利, 服务决策, 科创平台

CLC Number:

C934

XIE Jia-ping, XIA Yu, LIANG Ling, LIU dan. Service Level Decision of Scientific Instrument Sharing Platform[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(3): 65-70.

谢家平, 夏宇, 梁玲, 刘丹. 科研设备共享平台的配套服务水平决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(3): 65-70.

References

[1] 苏朝晖, 苏梅青.科技创新平台服务质量评价——对福州、厦门、泉州三地的实证研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2015(4):92-99.
[2] 谢家平, 孔訸炜, 张为四.科创平台的网络特征、运行治理与发展策略——以中关村、张江园科技创新实践为例[J].经济管理, 2017(5):38-51.
[3] Shu J, Chou M C, Liu Q, Teo C P, Wang I L. Models for effective deployment and redistribution of bicycles within public bicycle-sharing systems[J]. Operations Research, 2013, 61(6): 1346-1359.
[4] He L, Mak H Y, Rong Y, Shen Z J M. Service region design for urban electric vehicle sharing systems[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2016, 19(2): 165-335.
[5] Tang C S, Bai J, So K C, et al. Coordinating supply and demand on an on-demand platform: price, wage, and payout ratio[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2018, DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2831794.
[6] Taylor T A. On-demand service platforms[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2018, 20(4): 704-720.
[7] Cachon G P, Daniels K M, Lobel R. The role of surge pricing on a service platform with self-scheduling capacity[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2017, 19(3): 337-507.
[8] Chen Y, Hu M. Pricing and matching with forward-looking buyers and sellers[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2019, DOI:10.1287/msom.2018.0769.
[9] Banerjee S, Johari R, Riquelme C. Dynamic pricing in ridesharing platforms[J]. ACM SIGecom Exchanges, 2016, 15(1): 65-70.
[10] Li J, Moreno A, Zhang D J. Agent behavior in the sharing economy: evidence from airbnb[J]. Ross School of Business Working Paper Series, 2015, 1298: 2015.
[11] Wei Z, Lin M. Market mechanisms in online peer-to-peer lending[J]. Management Science, 2016, 63(12): 4236-4257.
[12] 周正龙, 马本江, 胡凤英.P2P网络借贷市场的双边拍卖机制设计[J].控制与决策, 2019(3):341-411.
[13] Gao G X, Fan Z P, Fang X, Lim Y F. Optimal Stackelberg strategies for financing a supply chain through online peer-to-peer lending[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, 267(2): 585-597.
[14] Benjaafar S, Kong G, Li X, Courcoubetis C. Peer-to-peer poduct saring: iplications for onership, uage, and scial wlfare in the saring eonomy[J]. Management Science, 2019, 65(2): 477-493.

Service Level Decision of Scientific Instrument Sharing Platform

科研设备共享平台的配套服务水平决策

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 11

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	OUYANG Lian Qun, HUANG Di, DING Jian-xun. Optimal Decisions on the Cycle Utilization of Express Packaging Materials and Social Welfare Analysis under Environmental Tax Policy [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(4): 54-60.
[2]	LIU Kai, LI Chun-fa, LI Dong-dong. Pricing, Service Decision and Recycling Mode of E-Closed-Loop Supply Chain Dominated by E-commerce Platform [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(12): 51-57.
[3]	WEI Guang-xing, YAO Yan-ling. The Influence of Environmental Protection Tax on Social Distribution in View of Supply Chain [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(12): 128-135.
[4]	FANG Wen-li, FANG Shi-jian. Analysis of Sequential Innovation Decisions: from the Perspective of Patent Policy [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(9): 101-105.
[5]	WANG Wen-bin, DING Jun-fei. Impact of Information Sharing on Closed-loop Supply Chain under Reward-Penalty Mechanism [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(7): 89-98.
[6]	CUI Zhi-wei, GAO Li-jun, ZENG Qing-chao. Evolution of FTA Networks Based on Split of FDI Revenue [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(3): 1-6.
[7]	HOU Wen-hua, YANG Dan-dan. Competition Strategy of Dual-channel Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Based on Medical Insurance Regulation and Consumer Utility [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(2): 8-15.
[8]	SHAO Lu-lu, YANG Jun, YANG Chao. Supply Chain Analysis for Electric Vehicle Considering the Product’s Environmental Quality and Consumer Inertia [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2017, 26(8): 99-108.
[9]	GAO Xin-wei, ZHANG Shu-liang, CHEN Hao, LI Jie-yi. Research on the Oil and Gas Resource Tax Rate in ChinaBased on Maximization of Social Welfare [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2016, 25(6): 155-161.
[10]	REN Jie, HE Ping, GONG Ben-gang. Game Analysis between Government and Enterprises and the Strategy ofGovernment Subsidies under Low-Carbon Economy [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2016, 25(6): 258-265.
[11]	QI Yong, HOU Ze-min, XIANG Tao. Licensing and Social Welfare in Duopoly: Based on the View of Endogenous Technology Innovation [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2013, 22(6): 161-167.