混合多属性决策问题中的权重研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2017.0011

运筹与管理 ›› 2017, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1): 76-81.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2017.0011

混合多属性决策问题中的权重研究

邹树梁, 武良鹏

南华大学经济与管理学院,湖南衡阳421001

收稿日期:2015-03-20 出版日期:2017-01-20
作者简介:邹树梁(1956-),男,博士,博士生导师,教授,主要研究方向:决策分析;武良鹏(1991-),男,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:决策分析。
基金资助:
高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金 (20134324110001);中国博士后面上基金 (2013M542123)

Research on the Weight of Hybrid Multiple Attribute Decision-making Problem

ZOU Shu-liang, WU Liang-peng

College of Economics and Management, The University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China

Received:2015-03-20 Online:2017-01-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对属性值以精确数、区间数、直觉梯形模糊数给出的混合多属性决策问题,提出一种基于属性的可靠性、属性对决策的影响度和决策者对属性的重视程度这三个维度给权重赋值的方法。首先对属性的可靠性进行定义,并计算出属性的可靠性;接着根据属性内部差异最大化求出属性对决策的影响度;随后利用直觉梯形模糊数之间的距离求出决策者对属性的重视程度,并用投影模型将这三个维度进行集成,得到最终的权重值。该方法能够使权重的获取更加全面,最后利用算例证明了本文方法的可行性。

关键词: 混合多属性, 权重, 可靠性, 影响度, 重视程度, 投影模型

Abstract: A method is proposed to entrust with the weights for the hybrid multiple attribute decision-making problem with real number, interval number and intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers, and the weight is evaluated by three aspects. They are reliability of the attributes, role of the attribute and the decision makers’preference of attributes. Firstly we define the meaning of reliability, and calculate reliability. Then the effect of attribute to decision is calculated based on the difference between attributes. Next, the distance between the intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy number is employed to confirm decision makers’ preference. Moreover, the projected model is used to integrate the three dimensionalities. This approach can make the weight more comprehensive. Finally, a case is applied to demonstrate its feasibility.

Key words: Hybrid multiple attribute, weight, reliability, role of the attribute, preference, projected model

中图分类号:

C934

邹树梁, 武良鹏. 混合多属性决策问题中的权重研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(1): 76-81.

ZOU Shu-liang, WU Liang-peng. Research on the Weight of Hybrid Multiple Attribute Decision-making Problem[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2017, 26(1): 76-81.

参考文献

[1]Shin-ichi Ohnishi, Takahiro Yamanoi. On fuzzy priority weights of AHP for double inner dependence structure[J]. Procedia Computer Science,2014,35.
[2]Meysam S, Mousavi R, Tavakkoli-moghaddam M, Heydar S. Ebrahimnejad. Multi-criteria decision making for plant location selection: an integrated delphi-AHP-PROMETHEE methodology[J]. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2013, 385.
[3]Kamran Rezaie, Sara Saeidi Ramiyani, Salman Nazari-Shirkouhi, Ali Badizadeh. Evaluating performance of Iranian cement firms using an integrated fuzzy AHP-VIKOR method[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2014. 38.
[4]郭亚军,李玲玉,易平涛,李伟伟.拉开档次法稳定性分析及改进[J].运筹与管理,2015,02:155-162+191.
[5]Chao Fu, Kwai-Sang Chin. Robust evidential reasoning approach with unknown attribute weights[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2014. 59.
[6]Fan Z P, Zhang X, Chen F D, Liu Y. Extended TODIM method for hybrid multiple attribute decision making problems[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2013. 42.
[7]赵慧冬,关世霞,包玉娥.基于组合赋权的区间型多属性决策方法[J].统计与决策,2012,19:98-101.
[8]李刚,王斌,周立斌,张明,陈凯.基于标准差修正G1组合赋权的人的全面发展评价模型及实证[J].系统工程理论与实践,2012,11:2473-2485.
[9]江文奇,朱艳.一种组合赋权的两阶段优化算法[J].运筹与管理,2013,06:21-25.
[10]Wang Y M, Luo Y. Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2010. 51.
[11]杨晓莉.混合多属性决策理论方法与应用研究[D].华中师范大学,2007.
[12]王坚强,张忠.基于直觉梯形模糊数的信息不完全确定的多准则决策方法[J].控制与决策,2009,02:226-230.
[13]李喜华.基于前景理论的复杂大群体直觉模糊多属性决策方法[D].中南大学,2012.
[14]Bertoluzza C, Solci M, Capodieci M L. Measure of a fuzzy set: the α-cut approach in the finite case[M]. Fuzzy Set Syst, 2001.

[1]	徐凡启, 贾旭杰, 松雪莹. 多状态可靠性系统动态signature及其剩余寿命分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(9): 38-42.
[2]	高彦三, 陈立伟, 马婧. Gamma分布下混联系统综合重要度扩展及应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(8): 139-146.
[3]	兑红炎, 郑小倩, 陈立伟, 杨楠. 基于半马尔科夫过程的逻辑门可靠性分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(5): 66-72.
[4]	陶玲玲, 尤天慧. 基于在线评价且考虑消费者类型的酒店排序方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(5): 122-128.
[5]	张伟平, 庄新田, 吴冬梅. 基于风险网络结构的资产分配策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(5): 161-167.
[6]	高雅, 岳立柱, 周志强. 权重可变条件下员工绩效排名稳健性的Hasse图分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(5): 208-213.
[7]	朱运霞, 昂胜, 杨锋. 基于SMAA和公共权重的决策单元效率评价与排序[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 184-189.
[8]	胡东滨, 谢玲. 基于云模型和证据推理的生态环境安全评价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(3): 130-136.
[9]	兑红炎, 陈栓栓, 段东立, 徐鑫. 面向可靠性的网络级联失效分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 106-112.
[10]	旷欣宇, 唐应辉. 带随机启动时间与双阈值(m,N)-策略的M/G/1可修排队系统的最优控制策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(10): 64-70.
[11]	宫华, 李作华, 刘洪涛, 郝永平. 基于改进PSO-BP神经网络的贮存可靠性预测[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(8): 105-111.
[12]	李晓娣, 张小燕, 尹士. 共生视角下我国区域创新生态系统发展观测——基于TOPSIS生态位评估投影模型的时空特征分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(6): 198-209.
[13]	孔造杰, 李斌. 基于理想点-矢量投影法的创新需求权重确定方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(2): 108-121.
[14]	张飞, 岳立柱, 王国辉. 基于偏序集的PROMETHEE方法优化研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(1): 10-16.
[15]	兑红炎, 陈立伟, 白光晗. 多态系统部件维修成本评估分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(9): 122-127.

混合多属性决策问题中的权重研究

Research on the Weight of Hybrid Multiple Attribute Decision-making Problem

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics