面向多部门多属性的群决策应急方案调整方法

doi:10.12005/orms.2020.0035

运筹与管理 ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 66-72.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2020.0035

面向多部门多属性的群决策应急方案调整方法

郑晶^1,2, 王应明²

1. 福建江夏学院电子信息科学学院,福建福州 350108;
2. 福州大学决策科学研究所,福建福州 350116摘要:针对具有多部门多属性的基于案例推理的应急方案生成问题,提出了一种新的群决策应急方案调整方法。首先,各部门根据关注的属性生成案例库,并应用检索方法得到最相似历史案例,再运用置信规则库进行应急方案调整来生成各部门应急方案;然后,各部门对每个部门生成的应急方案进行评价;在此基础上,根据各部门的评价信息确定权重,进而对各部门生成的应急方案进行集结得到目标案例的应急方案。最后,通过一个算例验证了所提出方法的可行性和有效性。关键词:群决策;案例推理;方案调整;置信规则库中图分类号:C931 文章标识码:A 文章编号:1007-3221202002-0066

收稿日期:2018-08-22 出版日期:2020-02-25
作者简介:郑晶(1980-), 女, 福建福州人, 教授, 博士, 研究方向:决策理论与方法, 应急决策;王应明(1964-), 男, 教授, 博士生导师, 研究方向:决策理论与方法、数据包络分析等研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(61773123);福建省自然科学基金项目(2017J01513)

Group Emergency Alternative Adaptation Method Oriented Characteristic of Multi-department and Multi-attribute

ZHENG Jing^1,2, WANG Ying-ming²

1. College of Electronics and Information Science, Fujian Jiangxia University, Fuzhou 350108, China;
2. Decision Sciences Institute, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, China

Received:2018-08-22 Online:2020-02-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对具有多部门多属性的基于案例推理的应急方案生成问题,提出了一种新的群决策应急方案调整方法。首先,各部门根据关注的属性生成案例库,并应用检索方法得到最相似历史案例,再运用置信规则库进行应急方案调整来生成各部门应急方案;然后,各部门对每个部门生成的应急方案进行评价;在此基础上,根据各部门的评价信息确定权重,进而对各部门生成的应急方案进行集结得到目标案例的应急方案。最后,通过一个算例验证了所提出方法的可行性和有效性。

关键词: 群决策, 案例推理, 方案调整, 置信规则库

Abstract: In order to solve the problem of the emergency alternative generation based on case-based reasoning with the characteristic of multi-department and multi-attribute, a new emergency alternative adaptation method based on group decision making is proposed. Firstly, each department generates a case base according to the concerned attributes, and the most similar historical case is obtained according to the retrieval method. The emergency alternative for each department is generated through the emergency alternative adaptation using the belief rule-base. Next, each department evaluates the emergency alternatives. Furthermore, the department weights are determined according to the evaluation information, and the final emergency alternative is generated by integrating the emergency alternatives of the participating departments. Finally, an illustrative example is provided to demonstrate the feasibility and validity of the proposed method.

Key words: group decision making, case-based reasoning, alternative adaptation, belief rule-base

中图分类号:

C931

郑晶, 王应明. 面向多部门多属性的群决策应急方案调整方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(2): 66-72.

ZHENG Jing, WANG Ying-ming. Group Emergency Alternative Adaptation Method Oriented Characteristic of Multi-department and Multi-attribute[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(2): 66-72.

参考文献

[1] Kou G, Wu W. Multi-criteria decision analysis for emergency medical service assessment[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2014, 223(1): 239-254.
[2] Fan Z P, Li Y H, Zhang Y. Generating project risk response strategies based on CBR: A case study[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42(6): 2870-2883.
[3] 封超,杨乃定,桂维民,等.基于案例推理的突发事件应急方案生成方法[J].控制与决策,2016,31(8):1526-1530.
[4] Yu F, Li X Y, Han X S. Risk response for urban water supply network using case-based reasoning during a natural disaster[J]. Safety Science, 2018, 106: 121-139.
[5] 郑晶,王应明,王韩杰.基于置信规则库的应急方案调整方法[J].信息与控制,2016,45(5):634-640.
[6] Li S T, Ho H F. Predicting financial activity with evolutionary fuzzy case-based reasoning[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36(1): 411-422.
[7] Yu W D, Liu Y C. Hybridization of CBR and numeric soft computing techniques for mining of scarce construction databases[J]. Automation in Construction, 2006, 15(1): 33-46.
[8] Zhang B, Li X, Wang S. A novel case adaptation method based on an improved integrated genetic algorithm for power grid wind disaster emergencies[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42(21): 7812-7824.
[9] Qi J, Hu J, Peng Y. A modularized case adaptation method of case-based reasoning in parametric machinery design[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2017, 64: 352-366.
[10] Butdee S. Adaptive aluminum extrusion die design using case-based reasoning and artificial neural networks[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 383-390: 6747-6754.
[11] Yang J B, Liu J, Wang J, et al. Belief rule-base inference methodology using the evidential reasoning Approach-RIMER[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man & Cybernetics Part A Systems & Humans, 2006, 36(2): 266-285.
[12] Yang L, Yanggeng F U, Yingjie W U. Structure learning approach of belief rule base for best decision structure[J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science & Technology, 2014, 8(10): 1216-1230.
[13] Wang Y M, Yanga J B. Environmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approach[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 174(3): 1885-1913.
[14] Wang Y M, Xu D L, Chin K S. The evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision analysis using interval belief degrees[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 174(3): 1914-1943.
[15] Fan Z P, Li Y H, Wang X, et al. Hybrid similarity measure for case retrieval in CBR and its application to emergency response towards gas explosion[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2014, 41(5): 2526-2534.
[16] Torfi F, Farahani R Z, Rezapour S. Fuzzy AHP to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and Fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives[J]. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 2010, 10(2): 520-528.
[17] Choudhury A K, Choudhury A K, Tiwari M K, et al. Improved decision neural network(IDNN)based consensus method to solve a multi-objective group decision making problem[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2007, 21(3): 335-348.
[18] Qin Q, Liang F, Li L, et al. A TODIM-based multi-criteria group decision making with triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2017, 55: 93-107.
[19] Yang J B, Liu J, Wang J, et al. Belief rule-base inference methodology using the evidential reasoning Approach-RIMER[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man & Cybernetics Part A Systems & Humans, 2006, 36(2): 266-285.
[20] Wang Y M, Yang J B, Xu D L, et al. Consumer preference prediction by using a hybrid evidential reasoning and belief rule-based methodology[J]. Expert Systems with Applications An International Journal, 2009, 36(4): 8421-8430.
[21] Torfi F, Farahani R Z, Rezapour S. Fuzzy AHP to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and Fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2010, 10(2): 520-528.
[22] 管清云,陈雪龙,王延章.基于距离熵的应急决策层信息融合方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2015,35(1):216-227.

面向多部门多属性的群决策应急方案调整方法

Group Emergency Alternative Adaptation Method Oriented Characteristic of Multi-department and Multi-attribute

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	杜玉琴. Pythagorean模糊Hamacher算子及其应用分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(7): 218-222.
[2]	关贤军, 周晗, 周礼刚, 陈华友. 一种基于Shapley值的Pythagorean模糊多属性群决策方法及其应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 81-86.
[3]	林文豪, 陈梅倩, 周礼刚, 林志超. 一种区间Pythagorean模糊VIKOR多属性群决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(3): 57-64.
[4]	吕金辉, 郭嗣琮. 基于因素空间理论的犹豫模糊群决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(3): 71-75.
[5]	李进军, 李婷婷, 包玉娥, 陈明浩. 区间毕达哥拉斯模糊幂几何-几何Heronian平均算子及其在多属性群决策中的应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 78-83.
[6]	崔春生, 曹艳丽, 邱闯闯, 郭玉洁, 王美琦, 臧振春. 基于证据理论和Vague集的多属性群决策方法研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 1-5.
[7]	徐选华, 刘尚龙, 陈晓红. 基于公众偏好大数据分析的重大突发事件应急决策方案动态调整方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(7): 41-51.
[8]	俞锦涛, 王金山. 基于Archimedean三角模的犹豫直觉模糊语言信息群决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(9): 27-32.
[9]	闫英, 锁斌, 甘蜜. 混合不确定性下基于区间证据随机抽样的统一赋权法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(8): 41-47.
[10]	黄海棠,吴坚,滕剑仑,蔡创能. 基于群体共识的农村土地流转优化决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(4): 26-32.
[11]	王凤,平轶男,周礼刚,陈华友. 一种基于新的区间二型梯形模糊相似测度的多属性群决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(4): 33-41.
[12]	周晓光, 肖喻, 孙峰. 基于直觉模糊二元语义交互式群决策的技术创新项目选择[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(2): 30-36.
[13]	张丽媛, 李涛. 三角模糊偏好下冲突型多属性群决策方法研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(2): 45-51.
[14]	莫国莉, 张卫国, 刘芳, 余星. 基于前景云的不确定语言多准则国际股指投资群决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(2): 126-138.
[15]	糜万俊, 江文奇, 戴跃伟. 三角模糊数去模糊化对VIKOR妥协解的影响研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(10): 77-82.