基于随机Petri网理论的邮轮灾难事故预警机制研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2020.0085

运筹与管理 ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 12-20.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2020.0085

基于随机Petri网理论的邮轮灾难事故预警机制研究

李明琨, 蒋欣颖

上海大学管理学院,上海 200444

收稿日期:2018-04-21 出版日期:2020-04-25
作者简介:李明琨(1975-),男,江西省人,博士,副教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向为供应链管理;蒋欣颖(1996-),女,重庆人,硕士,主要研究方向管理科学。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金项目(16BGL083);国家自然科学基金重点项目(71831008)

A Study on Pre-warning Mechanism of Cruise Disaster Accidents Based on Stochastic Petri Net Theory

Li Ming-kun, Jiang Xin-ying

School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China

Received:2018-04-21 Online:2020-04-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 邮轮安全事故的严重后果凸显了预警机制的重要性。本文采用集合结构对邮轮安全事故的致因进行分析与描述,以此建立邮轮预警指标体系,通过对指标体系的分析并结合船舶航行实践,设计了邮轮安全预警机制。本研究综合考虑气象条件、通航环境对邮轮航行安全的影响,通过引入与构建随机Petri网理论模型,结合“东方之星”轮沉船事故,对恶劣气象条件下邮轮的安全预警机制进行仿真分析。实验显示风级、雨量等级增长速率与邮轮面临灾难危机的概率之间存在非线性关系,且浪级、风级及雨量等级对邮轮安全预警状态有交互作用,并产生了三者交互作用下的预警临界曲面,为邮轮是否可继续安全航行提供定量分析与决策支持。

关键词: 邮轮, 预警机制, 随机Petri网, 仿真分析

Abstract: In this study, we focus on mechanisms to reduce cruise accidents which often lead to severe loss. We analyze accidents of cruises with a multiple set structure. We consider weather and water conditions, and formulate the problem into stochastic Petri nets. A real case of disasters on the Oriental Star cruise is studied. The simulation results indicate some critical factors, i.e. the growth rate of wind and rain, as well as hurricanes and rainstorms which have an impact on the safety of navigating a cruise. A non-linear interaction relation among these factors is reported for pre-warning disasters of cruises.

Key words: cruise, per-warning mechanism, stochastic petri net, simulation

中图分类号:

F224.33

李明琨, 蒋欣颖. 基于随机Petri网理论的邮轮灾难事故预警机制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(4): 12-20.

Li Ming-kun, Jiang Xin-ying. A Study on Pre-warning Mechanism of Cruise Disaster Accidents Based on Stochastic Petri Net Theory[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(4): 12-20.

参考文献

[1] 司有山,封莎丽,秦学.国内外邮轮旅游研究回顾与展望[J].重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版),2017,17(6):65-72.
[2] Roberts S E. Fatal work-related accidents in UK merchant shipping from 1919 to 2005[J]. Occupational Medicine, 2008, 58(2): 129-137.
[3] Lu C S, Tseng P H. Identifying crucial safety assessment criteria for passenger ferry services[J]. Safety Science, 2012, 50(7): 1462-1471.
[4] Mileski J P, Wang G, Beacham L L. Understanding the causes of recent cruise ship mishaps and disasters[J]. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 2014, 13: 65-70.
[5] Bowen C, Fidgeon P, Page S J. Maritime tourism and terrorism: customer perceptions of the potential terrorist threat to cruise shipping[J]. Current Issues in Tourism, 2014, 17(7): 610-639.
[6] 罗景峰.“4·16”韩国沉船事故致因分析及对海洋旅游安全的启示[J].中国公共安全(学术版),2015(1):32-35.
[7] 祝爱民.邮轮旅游安全事故预防机制及保障体系研究——以重庆东方之星沉船事故为例[J].学理论,2015(33):48-49.
[8] Port of hong kong in figures, 2013 ed[R]. Marine Department, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, 2013.
[9] Sun X Y, Yip T L, Liu J J. 2010 review on China port logistics development and 2011 outlook in China logistics development review (2009~2010)[R]. China Federation of Logistics and Purchasing and China Society of Logistics, 2010.
[10] Yip T L. Port traffic risks: a study of accidents in Hong Kong waters[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2008, 44(5): 921-931.
[11] Kristiansen S. Maritime transportation: safety management and risk analysis[M]. Routledge, 2013.
[12] Vairo T, Quagliati M, Del Giudice T, et al. From land-to water-use-planning: a consequence based case-study related to cruise ship risk[J]. Safety Science, 2017, 97: 120-133.
[13] 周荣喜,李守荣,杨敏,等.基于Delphi-AHP和加权集值统计的高校突发事件预警评估[J].运筹与管理,2013,22(3):146-153.
[14] Henriksen H J, Roberts M J, van der Keur P, et al. Participatory early warning and monitoring systems: a Nordic framework for web-based flood risk management[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2018, 31: 1295-1306.
[15] 张岳峰,何建敏,胡剑华.基于GSPN的应急管理工作流程建模与分析[J].统计与决策,2012(4):44-47.
[16] Zhou J. Petri net modeling for the emergency response to chemical accidents[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2013, 26(4): 766-770.
[17] 陈蓉,王慧敏,佟金萍.基于SPN的极端洪灾应急管理流程建模仿真[J].系统管理学报,2014,23(2):238-246.
[18] Zhou J, Reniers G. Petri-net based simulation analysis for emergency response to multiple simultaneous large-scale fires[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2016, 40: 554-562.
[19] Li Q, Deng Y, Liu C, et al. Modeling and analysis of subway fire emergency response: an empirical study[J]. Safety Science, 2016, 84: 171-180.
[20] 刘晓燕,吕涛.基于GSPN的能源应急管理流程建模与分析[J].科技管理研究,2014,34(21):175-179.
[21] Liu Z, Liu Y, Cai B, et al. Application of Petri nets to performance evaluation of subsea blowout preventer system[J]. ISA Transactions, 2015, 54: 240-249.
[22] 李健行,夏登友,武旭鹏.非常规突发灾害事故的演化机理与演变路径分析[J].安全与环境工程,2014,21(6):166-170.
[23] 徐江,吴穹.安全管理学[M].北京:航空工业出版社,1993.
[24] 李万帮,肖东生.事故致因理论述评[J].南华大学学报(社会科学版),2007(1):57-61.
[25] 李润求,施式亮,彭新.煤矿瓦斯爆炸事故演化的突变模型[J].中国安全科学学报,2008,18(3):22-27.
[26] 郑鹏,刘爱华,邵鹏,等.基于能量释放和轨迹交叉论的城市交通路口安全分析[J].安全与环境工程,2008,15(2):119-122.
[27] 林闯.随机Petri网和系统性能评价[M].清华大学出版社有限公司,2005.
[28] 崔政东,刘晋.基于广义随机Petri网的供应链建模与分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(12):18-24.

基于随机Petri网理论的邮轮灾难事故预警机制研究

A Study on Pre-warning Mechanism of Cruise Disaster Accidents Based on Stochastic Petri Net Theory

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	杨苏, 林浩东. 考虑公众参与的公共工程项目应急管理演化分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(5): 95-101.
[2]	曾庆成, 向惠, 曲晨蕊. 邮轮供应链销售渠道选择与定价策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(5): 140-146.
[3]	汪玉亭, 丰景春, 张可, 李明, 薛松. 基于SEIRS的建设工程质量风险传递模型及仿真研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(7): 214-221.
[4]	康伟, 杜蕾. 邻避冲突中的利益相关者演化博弈分析——以污染类邻避设施为例[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(3): 82-92.
[5]	柴瑞瑞, 刘德海, 陈静锋, 孙康. 考虑防御拓扑特征的暴恐事件演化博弈模型和仿真分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(5): 28-36.
[6]	马永红,王展昭,李欢,周文. 网络结构、采纳者偏好与创新扩散:基于采纳者决策过程的创新扩散系统动力学模型仿真分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2016, 25(3): 106-116.
[7]	李勇建, 王循庆, 乔晓娇. 基于随机Petri网的震后次生灾害演化模型研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2014, 23(4): 264-273.
[8]	郝立亚, 朱慧明, 虞克明. 基于贝叶斯滤波的股指动态结构特征研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2011, 20(6): 147-156.