基于概率语言BWM与PROMETHEEII的多准则决策方法

doi:10.12005/orms.2020.0152

运筹与管理 ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 124-129.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2020.0152

基于概率语言BWM与PROMETHEEII的多准则决策方法

耿秀丽, 周青超

上海理工大学管理学院,上海 200093

收稿日期:2019-05-13 出版日期:2020-06-25
作者简介:耿秀丽(1984-),女,山东东营人,副教授,博士,研究方向:产品服务系统、服务科学、决策理论与方法等;周青超(1992-),男,江苏盐城人,硕士研究生,研究方向:多准则决策。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71301104);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金(19YJA630021);高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助课题(20133120120002)

Multi criteria Decision Making Method Based on Probabilistic Language BWM and PROMETHEE II

GENG Xiu-li, ZHOU Qing-chao

Business School, University of Shanghai for Science of Technology, Shanghai 200093, China

Received:2019-05-13 Online:2020-06-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 提出了一种改进的偏好顺序结构评估法(Preference Ranking Organization Method For Enrichment Evaluations, PROMETHEE),即基于概率语言BWM与PROMETHEE II的多准则决策方法。针对多准则决策过程中,评价信息的模糊性和不确定性,采用概率语言(Probabilistic Linguistic Term Set, PLTS)处理评价信息,并纳入PROMETHEE II中对备选方案进行排序。针对传统的PROMETHEE II 中准则权重需要从外部获得的问题,采用最优最劣法(Best-worst Method, BWM)确定准则的权重。最后,以某企业无人机改造方案为例进行分析,验证所提方法的有效性和可行性。

关键词: 概率语言, 多准则决策, BWM, PROMETHEE II

Abstract: An improved Preference Ranking Organization Method For Enrichment Evaluations(PROMETHEE)method based on BWM and PROMETHEE II is proposed.Aiming at the ambiguity and uncertainty of evaluation information in the process of multi-criteria decision making, the evaluation information processed by the Probabilistic Linguistic Term Set(PTLS)is incorporated into PROMETHEE II to sort the alternatives. Aiming at the problem that the weight of traditional PROMETHEE II criterion needs to be acquired externally, the Best-worst Method(BWM)is adopted to determine the weight of criterion. Finally, an example is given to illustrate the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed method.

Key words: PTLS, multi-criteria decision, BWM, PROMETHEE II

中图分类号:

C934

耿秀丽, 周青超. 基于概率语言BWM与PROMETHEEII的多准则决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(6): 124-129.

GENG Xiu-li, ZHOU Qing-chao. Multi criteria Decision Making Method Based on Probabilistic Language BWM and PROMETHEE II[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(6): 124-129.

参考文献

[1] Brans J P, Vincke P. A preference ranking organization method the PROMETHEE method for MCDM[J]. Management Science, 1985, 31(6): 647-656.
[2] 石宝峰,刘锋,王建军,等.基于PROMETHEE-II的商户小额贷款信用评级模型及实证[J].运筹与管理,2017,26(9):137-147.
[3] 朱江洪,李延来,王睿.基于前景理论与PROMETHEE的FMEA风险评估[J].运筹与管理,2018,27(12):147-157.
[4] Liu H C, Li Z J, Song W Y, et al. Failure mode and effect analysis using cloud model theory and PROMETHEE method[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2017, 66(4): 1058-1072.
[5] 王征,余顺坤.改进PROMETHEE的城市防洪减灾方案优选模型——以北京市为例[J].中国农村水利水电,2017(4):45-49.
[6] Sen D K, Datta S, Mahapatra S S. Extension of PROMETHEE for robot selection decision making[J]. Benchmarking, 2016, 23(4):983-1014.
[7] Kuang H, Kilgour D M, Hipel K W. Grey-based PROMETHEE II with application to evaluation of source water protection strategies[J]. Information Sciences, 2015, 294: 376-389.
[8] Chen T Y. An interval type-2 fuzzy PROMETHEE method using a likelihood-based outranking comparison approach[J]. Information Fusion, 2015, 25: 105-120.
[9] 耿秀丽,邱华清.基于犹豫模糊PROMETHEEⅡ的设计方案群决策方法[J].计算机应用研究,2018,35(10):3020-3024.
[10] Pang Q , Wang H , Xu Z. Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group dcision making[J]. Information Sciences, 2016, 369:128-143.
[11] 潘文昊,黎建强.战略采购中供应商选择的AHP-PROMETHEE方法研究[J].运筹与管理,2009,18(2):41-46.
[12] Kessili A, Benmamar S. Prioritizing sewer rehabilitation projects using AHP-PROMETHEE II ranking method[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2016, 73(2): 283-291.
[13] Rezaei J. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method[J]. Omega, 2015, 53: 49-57.
[14] Liu H C, QuanM Y, LiZW, et al. A new integrated MCDM model for sustainable supplier selection under interval-valued intuitionistic uncertain linguistic environment[J]. Information Sciences, 2019, 486: 254-270.
[15] Safarzadeh S, Khansefid S, Rasti-Barzoki M. A group multi-criteria decision-making based on best-worst method[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2018, 126: 111-121.
[16] Ding H F, Liu H C. A new approach for emergency decision-making based on zero-sum game with Pythagorean fuzzy uncertain linguistic variables[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2019, 34(7): 1667-1684.
[17] Liao H C, Jiang L S, Xu Z H, et al. A linear programming method for multiple criteria decision making with probabilistic linguistic information[J]. Information Science, 2017, 415-416, 341-355.
[18] 潘亚虹,耿秀丽.考虑用户体验的产品服务系统模块重要度判定方法[J/OL]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5946.TP.20181130.1346.002.html.
[19] Kamble S G, Vadirajacharya K, Patil U V. Decision making in distribution system using improved AHP-PROMETHEE method.2017 International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication(ICCMC), Erode, 2017.279-283.

基于概率语言BWM与PROMETHEEII的多准则决策方法

Multi criteria Decision Making Method Based on Probabilistic Language BWM and PROMETHEE II

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张永政, 叶春明, 耿秀丽. 基于概率语言术语集的服务外包风险评估方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(9): 203-209.
[2]	徐选华, 侯宇舟, 何继善. 基于权威专家的不完全概率语言评价信息大群体决策方法及在干热岩勘探选址中的应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(8): 7-13.
[3]	汪兰林, 李登峰. 基于在线评价信息的概率语言多属性变权决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(2): 39-44.
[4]	赵萌, 张晨曦, 秦金磊, 张冰. 基于实验设计的概率语言权重信息多准则决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(1): 50-56.
[5]	江文奇, 袁亚纯. 融合关联性准则模糊测度的改进型VIKOR方法研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(1): 94-98.
[6]	刘超, 汤国林, 刘培德. 基于模糊测度与累积前景理论的区间二型模糊多准则决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(9): 70-81.
[7]	岳立柱, 李良琼. 基于在线信息的群评价模型及其偏序集求解方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(3): 111-117.
[8]	岳立柱, 张志杰, 闫艳. 蕴含权重的偏序集多准则决策法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(2): 26-31.
[9]	胡军华, 林增钰. 基于四参数区间数的多准则决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2013, 22(6): 84-91.