维修中心参与回收时闭环供应链的定价决策及回收模式选择

doi:10.12005/orms.2022.0217

运筹与管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 64-70.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2022.0217

维修中心参与回收时闭环供应链的定价决策及回收模式选择

卞文良¹, 潘岳², 王文宾³, 全诗苑³, 刘笑颜⁴

1. 北京交通大学经济管理学院,北京 100044;
2. 中国铁路上海局集团有限公司上海货运中心,上海 200040;
3. 中国矿业大学管理学院,江苏徐州 221116;
4. 北京移动平台生态部,北京 100007

收稿日期:2020-06-07 发布日期:2022-08-17
作者简介:卞文良(1978-),男,湖南长沙人;北京交通大学经济管理学院副教授,博士生导师;主要研究方向为物流与供应链管理。
基金资助:
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2022JBW8005);国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0803207);国家自然科学基金项目(71971210,71701200);四川循环经济研究中心重点项目资助(XHJJ-1902)

Pricing and Recycling Mode Selection of Closed-loop Supply Chain Considering the Maintenance Center Participation into Recycling Process

BIAN Wen-liang¹, PAN Yue², WANG Wen-bin³, QUAN Shi-yuan³, LIU Xiao-yan⁴

1. School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China;
2. Shanghai Freight Center, China Railway Shanghai Group Company Limited, Shanghai 200040, China;
3. School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China;
4. Department of Platform Ecology, China Mobile Group Beijing Company Limited, Beijing 100007, China

Received:2020-06-07 Published:2022-08-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 维修中心参与回收是闭环供应链研究面临的新情境。本文将维修中心可以免费获得零部件的情形考虑进来,分别给出了回收商单回收渠道模式、回收商与第三方维修中心双回收渠道模式,在此基础上深入研究了两种模式下闭环供应链的定价决策及回收模式选择问题。结果表明:两种模式下,官方维修中心免费获得零部件数量的增加都会对制造商利润产生积极影响,但不会对其回购价产生影响;双回收渠道模式下,第三方维修中心免费获得零部件数量的增加会使制造商的回购价降低,使其利润增加。从有偿回收产品总数量最大化的角度来看,当第三方维修中心免费获得零部件的数量较低且两种渠道之间的竞争程度较高时,应该选择双回收渠道模式。从制造商利润最大化的角度来看,模式选取决策与两种模式下官方维修中心免费获得零部件数量的相对大小有关。

关键词: 维修中心, 闭环供应链, 定价, 回收模式

Abstract: With the proposition of the extended producer responsibility, manufacturing companies are not only responsible for the production of products, but also for the recycling and disposal of waste products. At present, most manufacturing companies recycle waste products through recyclers, and ignore the recycling channel of the maintenance center. The maintenance center can not only recover the waste products for compensation, but also obtain replaced parts during the repair process for free, which can reduce the recycling cost. Taking this situation into account, we first propose two recycling modes: a single recycling channel mode of a recycler, a dual recycling channel mode of a third-party maintenance center and a recycler. The Stackelberg game model is used to obtain the optimal pricing of enterprises in the two modes. Second, we analyze the optimal solution and parameters of the model. Finally, we compare and analyze these two modes. Our research shows some interesting results. Under both modes, the increase in the quantity of parts obtained for free by the official maintenance center will have a positive impact on the manufacturer’s profit, but it will not affect the manufacturer’s repurchase price. Under a dual recycling channel mode, the repurchase price of the manufacturer decreases with the quantity of parts obtained for free by the third-party maintenance center, and the profit of the manufacturer increases with the quantity of parts obtained for free by the third-party maintenance center. From the perspective of maximizing the total quantity of paid recycled products, when the quantity of parts obtained for free by the third-party maintenance center is low and the degree of competition between the two channels is high, the dual recycling channel mode should be selected; otherwise, the single recycling channel mode should be selected. From the perspective of maximizing the profit of the manufacturer, the mode selection is related to the relative size of the quantity of free parts obtained by the official maintenance center under two modes.

Key words: maintenance center, closed-loop supply chain, pricing, recycling mode

中图分类号:

F272

卞文良, 潘岳, 王文宾, 全诗苑, 刘笑颜. 维修中心参与回收时闭环供应链的定价决策及回收模式选择[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(7): 64-70.

BIAN Wen-liang, PAN Yue, WANG Wen-bin, QUAN Shi-yuan, LIU Xiao-yan. Pricing and Recycling Mode Selection of Closed-loop Supply Chain Considering the Maintenance Center Participation into Recycling Process[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2022, 31(7): 64-70.

参考文献

[1] 王文宾,丁军飞,林欣怡.政府补贴对双回收渠道价格竞争的引导作用研究.科研管理,2020,41(3):225-235.
[2] Karakayali I, Emir-Farinas H, Akcali E. An analysis of decentralized collection and processing of end-of-life products. Journal of Operations Management, 2007, 25(6): 1161-1183.
[3] Li S X, Huang Z, Zhu J, et al. Cooperative advertising, game theory and manufacturer-retailer supply chains. Omega, 2002, 30(5): 347-357.
[4] 王文宾,邓雯雯.逆向供应链的政府奖惩机制与税收-补贴机制比较研究.中国管理科学,2016,24(04):102-110.
[5] 黄祖庆,易荣华,达庆利.第三方负责回收的再制造闭环供应链决策结构的效率分析.中国管理科学,2008,16(3):73-77.
[6] 陈逸伦,石晶,肖条军.基于交易定价的再制造供应链回收处理服务决策.物流工程与管理,2014,36(6):55-59.
[7] Goh M, Lu Qing, Souza R D. Remanufacturing in a-sia: location choice and outsourcing. International Journal of Logistics Management, 2014, 25(1): 20-34.
[8] 倪明莫,露骅.两种回收模式下废旧电子产品再制造闭环供应链模型比较研究.中国软科学,2013(08):170-175.
[9] 江兵,陈志黄,陈芬虹.考虑回收能力不足与回收品质量不确定的再制造成本优化.合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2016,39(10):1425-1431.
[10] Modak N M, Modak N, Panda S, et al. Analyzing structure of two-echelon closed-loop supply chain for pricing, quality and recycling management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 171: 512-528.
[11] 冯章伟,肖条军,柴彩春.第三方回收商领导型两级闭环供应链的回收与定价策略.中国管理科学,2018,26(01):118-127.
[12] Ferrer G, Swaminathan J M, Managing new and remanufactured products. Management Science, 2006, 52(01): 15-26.
[13] 黄燕婷,王宗军.技术许可下信息分享和政府补贴对闭环供应链的影响分析——基于经销商再制造模式.运筹与管理,2019,28(03):57-66.
[14] 林贵华,单仁邦,陈拼博.政府补贴下闭环供应链回收渠道的选择策略.运筹与管理,2020,29(04):43-53.
[15] 赵静,肖亚倩.不同渠道偏好和运营成本下双渠道闭环供应链定价决策研究.运筹与管理,2018,27(12):108-114.
[16] 丁斌,马海庆.两级再制造的S-M闭环供应链的决策与绩效分析.中国管理科学,2015,23(06):118-125.
[17] 葛静燕,黄培清.基于博弈论的闭环供应链定价策略分析.系统工程学报,2008(01):111-115.
[18] Seong Y. Park, Hean Tat Keh. Modelling hybrid distribution channels: a game-theoretic analysis. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Serbvice, 2003, 10: 155-167.
[19] 倪明,张族华,郭军华,等.不确定需求条件下双渠道回收闭环供应链回收模式比较.系统工程,2017,35(02):60-68.
[20] 易余胤,袁江.渠道冲突环境下的闭环供应链协调定价模型.管理科学学报,2012,15(01):54-65.

维修中心参与回收时闭环供应链的定价决策及回收模式选择

Pricing and Recycling Mode Selection of Closed-loop Supply Chain Considering the Maintenance Center Participation into Recycling Process

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	曹晓刚, 黄美, 闻卉. 考虑制造成本扰动的闭环供应链回收与协调策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(7): 79-85.
[2]	肖敏, 张耀. 产能约束下的闭环供应链制造商合作策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(7): 146-151.
[3]	林先伟, 秦学志, 尚勤. 混合分数布朗运动下欧式期权模糊定价研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(7): 173-178.
[4]	郑夏冰, 徐航, 李雪, 杨锋. 全渠道服务商在线上自助服务技术背景下的定价策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(7): 179-185.
[5]	罗治洪, 洪玉婷. 产能限制下单向替代产品供应链生产、订货与定价研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(7): 186-192.
[6]	程明宝, 王影, 邹美萍, 后锐. 考虑消费者具有质量和价格偏好的双渠道供应链最优决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6): 74-81.
[7]	卢超, 邢窈窈. 基于线上评论的生鲜产品供应链定价策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6): 91-97.
[8]	赵玲, 刘志学. 考虑顾客退货和固定成本的联合补货与定价策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6): 105-110.
[9]	赵瑞嘉, 谢新连, 李国栋. 维修保障船与修船厂维修远海受损舰船的定价博弈[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(5): 23-29.
[10]	陈克贵, 王新宇, 黄敏, 任亮. 考虑残值变化和消费者低碳偏好的生产定价与销售激励机制[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(5): 162-168.
[11]	彭扬, 卢锦航, 言小明. 线上零售商全渠道门店布局密度策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(4): 21-27.
[12]	郑清, 阿布都热合曼·卡的尔. 碳税机制下考虑不同低碳策略的动态博弈模型及复杂性研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(4): 55-60.
[13]	吴玉萍, 水源宋, 原白云, 王晓梅. 考虑大数据营销和风险规避的绿色供应链决策与协调[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(2): 62-69.
[14]	孙立成, 应梦煌, 张济建. 碳转移与消费者低碳偏好双重影响下供应链异质性产品定价与协调研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(2): 155-161.
[15]	李军祥, 王宇倩, 孙权, 党亚峥, 高岩. 电力零售商引导下智能电网多方利益均衡策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(2): 209-215.