运筹与管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9): 177-183.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2025.0292

• 应用研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

建筑施工劳务分包作业下多主体安全行为演化博弈研究

成连华1,2, 王晨1, 李树刚1   

  1. 1.西安科技大学 安全科学与工程学院,陕西 西安 710054;
    2.西安科技大学 管理学院,陕西 西安 710054
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-13 出版日期:2025-09-25 发布日期:2026-01-19
  • 通讯作者: 成连华(1977-),男,山东莘县人,教授,博士,研究方向:安全管理与安全系统工程。Email: chenglianhua@126.com。
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省自然科学基金面上项目(2025JC-YBMS-411)

Study of Evolutionary Game of Multi-agent Safety Behavior under Subcontracting Operation of Building Construction Labor

CHENG Lianhua1,2, WANG Chen1, LI Shugang1   

  1. 1. School of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China;
    2. College of Management, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
  • Received:2021-10-13 Online:2025-09-25 Published:2026-01-19

摘要: 为提高劳务分包作业施工现场安全管理水平,基于前景理论构建了总承包方、劳务分包方与工人三方演化博弈模型,从风险感知与心理账户视角分析了三方行为决策机制及其关联性,并运用MATLAB仿真模拟不同因素变化对系统稳定状态的影响。研究发现,系统演化稳定状态受安全管理成本、惩罚力度、行为效价与事故损失等因素的影响。其中,积极管理,积极管理,安全作业是系统最理想演化稳定策略。提升各主体对安全处罚和事故损失的感知价值,有助于系统向理想状态演化;此外,降低安全投入成本和利用技术手段提升管理有效性,能增强施工安全风险管控能力,降低事故发生概率。本文为建筑施工劳务分包领域的协同安全管理提供了理论与实践依据。

关键词: 演化博弈, 安全行为, 多主体, 劳务分包, 前景理论

Abstract: In order to enhance safety management at construction sites involving labor subcontracting, this study develops a tripartite evolutionary game model based on prospect theory, incorporating the general contractor, labor subcontractor, and workers. By integrating risk perception and mental accounting mechanisms, the decision-making behaviors of these three parties under uncertainty are systematically analyzed. A perceived benefit matrix is constructed to reflect the subjective evaluations of gains and losses, incorporating elements such as safety compliance benefits, risk compensation, and potential penalties. Furthermore, replicator dynamic equations are derived and solved to examine strategic interactions and evolutionary pathways among the multiple agents, identifying equilibrium conditions and convergence trends under varying constraints. Numerical simulations using MATLAB are conducted to evaluate how variations in key parameters such as safety management costs, penalty intensity, behavioral valence, and accident losses influence the system’s evolutionary trajectory and stability. These simulations also assess the sensitivity of each party’s decision-making to changes in regulatory and economic conditions.
The results indicate that the stability of the safety management system is significantly affected by these factors. The strategy combination(active management, active management, and safe operation) is identified as the most favorable evolutionary stable strategy, which effectively aligns the interests of all participants while minimizing systemic risks. Enhancing the perceived value of penalties and accident losses for all parties proves effective in guiding the system toward this ideal state by increasing the psychological and financial weight of non-compliance. Additional measures include reducing the psychological reference point for safety investment costs through improved cost-sharing mechanisms and policy incentives, as well as adopting technological means to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of safety management. These interventions collectively strengthen risk control capabilities, enhance coordination among stakeholders, and reduce the probability of accidents.
This research integrates behavioral economics with the evolutionary game theory, providing theoretical insights and practical strategies for optimizing safety management in subcontracting-intensive construction environments. The findings highlight the importance of addressing perceptual and psychological factors in safety management systems and offer actionable recommendations for policymakers and project managers to enhance collaborative risk governance. By aligning economic incentives with safety objectives, this study contributes to the development of more resilient and adaptive safety management frameworks in complex construction projects.

Key words: evolutionary game, safety behavior, multi-agent, labor subcontractors, prospect theory

中图分类号: