考虑决策者心理行为的直觉语言多属性决策方法

doi:10.12005/orms.2019.0146

运筹与管理 ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (7): 11-16.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2019.0146

考虑决策者心理行为的直觉语言多属性决策方法

刘宁元

广东轻工职业技术学院财贸学院,广东广州 510000

收稿日期:2017-07-07 出版日期:2019-07-25
作者简介:刘宁元(1974-),男,湖南衡阳人,副教授,硕士,研究方向:应用数学、不确定决策等研究。
基金资助:
湖南省自然科学基金项目(2015JJ2047);广东省哲学社会科学“十三五”规划共建项目(GD16XYJ17);广东轻工职业技术学院人文社科重点项目(KJRW010)

Multiple Attribute Decision-making Method of Intuitionistic LinguisticConsidering Psychological Behavior of Decision-maker

LIU Ning-yuan

School of Finance and Trade, Guangdong Industry Polytechnic, Guangzhou, Guangdong 51000, China

Received:2017-07-07 Online:2019-07-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对应用直觉语言集来表达决策信息的语言多属性决策问题,在考虑决策者有限理性的心理行为基础上,提出一种决策方法。该方法通过比较每个属性下方案之间的得分函数和精确函数, 构建方案的收益-损失分析矩阵。在考虑决策者参照依赖和损失规避心理行为基础上,计算每个方案相对于其它方案在每个属性下的收益-损失值优先度;在此基础上,计算备选方案的综合优先度, 并根据其大小对方案进行排序择优。最后通过一个算例验证所提出方法的有效性和合理性。

关键词: 直觉语言数, TODIM方法, 心理行为, 多属性决策

Abstract: Aiming at the linguistic multi-attribute decision making problem in which intuitive linguistic sets are used to express decision information, a decision-making method is proposed on the basis of considering the decision maker’s bounded rational psychological behavior. The method constructs the benefit-loss analysis matrix of the scheme by comparing the score function and the exact function between the schemes under each attribute. Considering the decision-maker’s psychological behavior of dependence and loss avoidance, the priority of benefit-loss value of each alternative is calculated relative to that of other alternatives under each attribute. On this basis, the comprehensive priority of alternatives is calculated, and the alternatives are ranked according to their size. Finally, an example is given to verify the validity and rationality of the proposed method.

Key words: intuitive linguistic number, TODIM method, psychological behavior, multiple attribute decision making

中图分类号:

C934
O159

刘宁元. 考虑决策者心理行为的直觉语言多属性决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(7): 11-16.

LIU Ning-yuan. Multiple Attribute Decision-making Method of Intuitionistic LinguisticConsidering Psychological Behavior of Decision-maker[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(7): 11-16.

参考文献

[1] Zadeh L A. Fuzzysets[J]. Information and Control, 1965, 8(3): 338-353.
[2] Zadeh L A. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I[J]. Information Science, 1975, 8(3): 199-249.
[3] Xu Z S. A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations[J]. Information Sciences, 2004, 166(1/2/3/4): 19-30.
[4] Xu Z S. Linguistic decision making: theories and methods[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2012. 177-225.
[5] Atanassov K T. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1986, 20(1): 87-96.
[6] 王坚强,李寒波.基于直觉语言集结算子的多准则决策方法[J].控制与决策,2010,25(10):1571-1574.
[7] 王坚强,王佩.基于直觉模糊熵的直觉语言多准则决策方法[J].控制与决策,2012,27(11):1694-1698.
[8] Liu P. Some generalized dependent aggregation operators with intuitionistic linguistic numbers and their application to group decision making[J]. J of Computer and System Sciences, 2013, 79(1): 131-143.
[9] Wang X, Wang J, Deng S. Some geometric operators for aggregating intuitionistic linguistic information[J]. Int J of Fuzzy Systems, 2015, 17(2): 268-278.
[10] Simon H A. Administrative behavior[M]. Glencoe: Free Press, 1976.
[11] Kahneman D, Tversky A.Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk[J]. Econometrica, 1979, 47(2): 263-291.
[12] 高建伟,刘慧晖.基于累积前景理论的直觉语言风险型多属性决策方法[J].数学的实践与认识,2016,46(23):57-65.
[13] Fan Z P, Zhang X, Chen F D, Liu Y. Multiple attribute decision making considering aspiration-levels:a method based on prospect theory[J]. Computers ＆ Industrial Engineering, 2013, 65(2): 341-350.
[14] Gomes L F A M, Lima M M P P. TODIM:basic and application to multicriteria ranking of projects with environmental impacts[J]. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 1992, 16(4): 113-127.
[15] 樊治平,陈发动,张晓.考虑决策者心理行为的区间数多属性决策方法[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2011,32(1):136-139.
[16] Krohling R A, de Souza T. Combining prospect theory and fuzzy numbers to multi-criteria decision making[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39(13): 11487-11493.
[17] Zhang X L, Xu Z S. The TODIM analysis approach based on novel measured functions under hesitant fuzzy environment[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2014, 61: 48-58.
[18] 梁霞,姜艳萍,梁海明.考虑属性关联的C-TODIM决策方法[J].运筹与管理,2015,24(2):101-107
[19] 姜艳萍,梁霞,张业谛.一种属性信息不完全的TODIM决策方法[J].运筹与管理,2015,24(1):116-121.
[20] 孔令艳,谭倩云.犹豫模糊语言TODIM法及其应用[J].统计与决策,2017,(473)5:98-100.
[21] Loomes G, Sugden R. Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty[J]. J of Econo-mic, 1982, 92(368): 805-824.
[22] Bell D E. Regret in decision making under uncertainty[J]. Operations Research, 1982, 30(5): 961-981.
[23] 汪新凡,王坚强.基于后悔理论的具有期望水平的直觉语言多准则决策方法[J].控制与决策,2016,31(9):1638-1644.
[24] 汪新凡.基于直觉语言信息的多准则决策方法研究[D].长沙:中南大学,2014.
[25] Chorus C G. Random regret-based discrete choice modeling[M]. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012.
[26] Gomes L F A M, Rangel L A D. An applicat ion of the TODIM method to the multicrit eria rental evaluation of residential properties[J]. European Jou rnal of Operational Research, 2009, 193(1): 204-211.

考虑决策者心理行为的直觉语言多属性决策方法

Multiple Attribute Decision-making Method of Intuitionistic LinguisticConsidering Psychological Behavior of Decision-maker

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	胡文发, 何新华. 绿色建筑前期设计阶段的多目标优化及多属性决策模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(7): 44-49.
[2]	吴澎, 吴群, 周礼刚, 陈华友. 基于多目标属性权重优化的犹豫模糊语言TOPSIS决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 42-47.
[3]	杨敏, 张仕斌, 张航. 基于新模糊熵和得分函数的区间直觉模糊多属性决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 63-68.
[4]	于倩, 廖娅, 曹俊, 侯福均. 基于QUALIFLEX和LINMAP的简化中性犹豫模糊多属性决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 77-82.
[5]	李清水, 李登峰, 李辉, 余高锋. 基于前景理论的区域绿色经济发展水平多指标评价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 118-123.
[6]	李茹霞, 扈文秀, 齐晓亮. 区间二型模糊集效用函数和熵在风险决策中的应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(5): 102-109.
[7]	李鹏宇, 吴冲. 基于改进得分函数的直觉梯形模糊数群体多属性决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 76-80.
[8]	朱峰, 刘玉敏, 徐济超, 苏冰杰. 基于相似度和改进雷达图的概率犹豫模糊多属性决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 109-114.
[9]	汪兰林, 李登峰. 基于在线评价信息的概率语言多属性变权决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(2): 39-44.
[10]	刘政敏, 徐洪雪, 刘培德, 梁霞. 考虑多元关联关系和语义变换的直觉不确定语言多属性决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(2): 45-52.
[11]	杨艺, 李延来, 丁恒, 吕红霞. 直觉语言Hamacher加权集结算子及其应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(1): 87-93.
[12]	李娜, 高雷阜, 王磊. 基于Pythagorean模糊熵的风险型决策方法——考虑后悔与失望规避[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(6): 130-138.
[13]	曾守桢, 骆丹丹. 基于投影模型的区间直觉模糊多属性决策方法研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(3): 10-15.
[14]	李鹏, 沈志杰. 基于广义WOWA算子的Pythagorean模糊决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(2): 58-65.
[15]	王磊, 陶刘芹. Picture模糊幂几何Heronian平均算子及其在多属性决策中的应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(12): 59-66.