基于异质预期的量子伯川德博弈复杂动力机制分析

doi:10.12005/orms.2022.0182

运筹与管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 56-60.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2022.0182

基于异质预期的量子伯川德博弈复杂动力机制分析

张新立, 田英楠, 王嘉琪

辽宁师范大学数学学院,辽宁大连 116029

收稿日期:2020-03-25 出版日期:2022-06-25 发布日期:2022-07-20
作者简介:张新立(1970-),男,山东莘县人,教授,博士,研究方向为博弈论及应用。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71603245);教育部人文社科规划项目(21YJA630116)

Complex Dynamics Analysis of a Quantum Bertrand Duopoly Model with Heterogeneous Expectations

ZHANG Xin-li, TIAN Ying-nan, WANG Jia-qi

School of Mathematics, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China

Received:2020-03-25 Online:2022-06-25 Published:2022-07-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对伯川德双寡头垄断博弈经济系统中出现的混沌现象,利用量子博弈论,构建了基于有限理性与天真预期行为的量子伯川德动态博弈模型,分析了量子纠缠度对纳什均衡点稳定性及复杂动力行为的影响。结果表明:量子纠缠度能增强该系统的稳定性,企业价格调整速度达到某一程度时会导致该系统的复杂混沌特性,纠缠度可以有效控制混沌状态。最后利用数值模拟从分岔、最大李雅普诺夫指数、奇怪吸引子、初始条件敏感性及分数维数方面验证了理论准确性。

关键词: 量子伯川德博弈模型, 异质性预期, 量子纠缠度, 复杂动力机制

Abstract: In order to discuss the chaotic phenomenon of Bertrand duopoly game in economic system, based on the bounded rationality and naive expectation, the paper sets up a dynamic model of quantum Bertrand duopoly game by applying quantum game theory. We analyze the effect of quantum entanglement degree on stability of the equilibrium points and complex dynamics behaviors. The result shows that the quantum entanglement degree can enhance the stability of the system. The price adjustment speeds of the two firms can lead to complex chaotic characteristics of the system, the quantum entanglement degree can control the system's chaos. Numerical simulations demonstrate the correction of the theory via bifurcation, largest Lyapunov exponent, strange attractors, sensitivity to initial conditions and fractal dimensions.

Key words: quantum Bertrand duopoly game model, heterogeneous expectations, quantum entanglement degree, complex dynamics

中图分类号:

F224.32

张新立, 田英楠, 王嘉琪. 基于异质预期的量子伯川德博弈复杂动力机制分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6): 56-60.

ZHANG Xin-li, TIAN Ying-nan, WANG Jia-qi. Complex Dynamics Analysis of a Quantum Bertrand Duopoly Model with Heterogeneous Expectations[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2022, 31(6): 56-60.

参考文献

[1] Steven E L. Quantum game theory[J]. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 2011, 42(4): 1089-1099.
[2] Meyer D A. Quantum strategies[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1999, 82(5): 1052-1055.
[3] Eisert J, Wilkens M, Lewenstein M. Quantum games and quantum strategies[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1998, 83(15): 3077-3080.
[4] Piotrowski E W, Sladkowski J. Trading by quantum rules: quantum anthropic principle[J]. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2003, 42(5): 1101-1106.
[5] Keyl M. Fundamentals of information theory[J]. Physics Reports, 2002, 369(5): 431-548.
[6] Busemeyer J R, Bruza P D. Quantum models of cognition and decision[M]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012.
[7] Li H, Du J F, Massar S. Continuous-variable quantum games[J]. Physics Letters A, 2002, 306(2): 73-78.
[8] Khan S, Ramzan M. Quantum model of Bertrand duopoly[J]. Chinese Physics Letters, 2010, 27(8): 11-14.
[9] Sun M, Lu D W, Ju C Y. An applicable multiple-players quantum market game[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology of China, 2012, 42(4): 259-264.
[10] Frackiewicz P, Sładkowski J. Quantum approach to Bertrand duopoly[J]. Quantum Information Processing. 2016, 15(9): 3637–3650.
[11] Agiza H N, Elsadany A A. Chaotic dynamics in nonlinear duopoly game with heterogeneous players[J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2004, 149(3): 843-860.
[12] Yassen M T, Agiza H N. Analysis of a duopoly game with delayed bounded rationality[J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2003, 138(2-3): 387-402.
[13] Ma J H, Si F S. Complex dynamics of a continuous bertrand duopoly game model with two-stage delay[J]. Entropy, 2016, 18(266): 2-16.
[14] Iskhakov F, Rust J, Schjerning B. The dynamics of bertrand price competition with cost-reducing investments[J]. International Economic Review, 2018, 59(4): 1681-1731.
[15] Demuynck T, Herings J J, Saulle R D, Seel C. Bertrand competition with asymmetric costs: a solution in pure strategies[J]. Theory and Decision, 2019, 87(2): 147-154.
[16] Sarafopoulos G, Papadopoulos K. Chaos in oligopoly models[J]. International Journal of Productivity Management and Assessment Technologies, 2019, 7(1): 50-76.
[17] Puu T. Attractors, bifurcation and chaos: nonlinear phenomena in economics[M]. Springer, Berlin, 2003.

基于异质预期的量子伯川德博弈复杂动力机制分析

Complex Dynamics Analysis of a Quantum Bertrand Duopoly Model with Heterogeneous Expectations

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	王辰宇, 孙静春. 基于电商平台的供应链广告决策和分销模式研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6): 61-66.
[2]	刘雯雯, 胡振华. 市场自治与低碳认证情形下企业低碳生产行为研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(4): 232-239.
[3]	潘峰, 刘月, 王琳. 四方主体参与下的环境规制演化博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(3): 63-71.
[4]	郭延禄, 罗公利, 侯贵生. 短视频慈善主体的“双重变现”隐忧和规制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(3): 79-85.
[5]	唐启明, 李美娟. 促进网络投资的互联网骨干网互联结算规制改革研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(2): 126-132.
[6]	马本江, 蒋学海. 三群体2×2×2非对称演化博弈稳定性分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(1): 38-45.
[7]	孙中苗, 徐琪. 不同价格模式下考虑需求波动性和差异化服务的网约车平台定价决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(1): 52-60.
[8]	项寅. 网络阻断问题研究热点及发展方向[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(1): 128-134.
[9]	陈智颖, 钱崇秀, 陈苗臻. 基于动态演化博弈分析的投贷联动创新机制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 162-167.
[10]	刘国山, 刁海璨. 高科技企业与知识型员工劳资之间的薪酬博弈模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(10): 6-10.
[11]	肖汉杰, 于法稳, 唐洪雷, 彭定洪, 周建华. 低碳环境友好技术政产学研金协同创新演化博弈研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(10): 39-46.
[12]	寇坡, 韩颖, 石俊国. 中央环保督察背景下地方政府环境管制行为研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(10): 127-133.
[13]	蒋惠凤, 刘益平. 基于演化博弈的大运河文化带城市间合作发展策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(10): 175-182.
[14]	夏良杰, 柳慧, 黄迎, 李友东, 孙莹. 碳交易规制下的制造商减排外包模式选择:定制vs订购?[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(10): 199-205.
[15]	杨宏林, 窦甜丹, 高明运. 考虑RFID应用的资金约束供应链订购决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(8): 93-98.