基于电商平台的供应链广告决策和分销模式研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2022.0183

运筹与管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 61-66.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2022.0183

基于电商平台的供应链广告决策和分销模式研究

王辰宇^1,2, 孙静春^1,2

1.西安交通大学管理学院,陕西西安 710049;
2.过程控制与效率工程教育部重点实验室(西安交通大学),陕西西安 710049

收稿日期:2020-11-22 出版日期:2022-06-25 发布日期:2022-07-20
作者简介:王辰宇(1995-),男,安徽阜阳人,博士研究生,研究方向:供应链管理、合作广告;孙静春(1966-),男,河北唐山人,教授,博士生导师,研究方向:供应链管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71372164)

AdvertisingDecisions and Distribution Modes in the Supply Chain Based on E-commerce Platform

WANG Chen-yu^1,2, SUN Jing-chun^1,2

1. School of Management, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Process Control & Efficiency Engineering (Xi'an Jiaotong University), Ministry of Education, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China

Received:2020-11-22 Online:2022-06-25 Published:2022-07-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文建立包含一个制造商和一个电商平台的序贯博弈模型,讨论分销模式对供应链成员广告决策和收益的影响。电商平台中存在两种分销模式:批发模式下制造商将产品卖给平台,平台再进行零售;平台模式下制造商通过平台直接销售产品。另外,制造商和平台都可以选择是否参与广告活动并决定各自的广告投入。研究发现:两种分销模式下供应链成员都应参与广告活动;与批发模式相比,平台模式下制造商广告投入增加而平台广告投入降低。平台佣金率增加一定减小制造商的收益,但只有当制造商的广告效果或平台佣金率较小时,才会增加平台的收益。两种分销模式下供应链的总收益都低于纵向整合供应链的总收益;当平台佣金率适中时,制造商选择平台模式可以实现帕累托改进。

关键词: 电商平台, 供应链, 广告决策, 分销模式, 博弈

Abstract: We formulate a sequential game theory model with one manufacturer and one platform to discuss the effects of distribution modes on the supply chain members' advertising decisions and profits. There are two distribution modesinthe platform: in the wholesale mode, the manufacturer provides its products to the platform and the platform then resell the products; in the platform mode, the manufacturer sells directly to the consumer via the platform. On the other hand, both the manufacturer and the platformfirstdecide whether to engage in advertising activities and then determine their respective advertising efforts. The results are as follows. The supply chain members should engage in advertising activities under both distribution modes, and compared with the wholesale mode, the manufacturer advertises more and the platform advertises less under the platform mode. The increase in the commission rate always decreases the manufacturer's profit, but increases the platform's profit only when the manufacturer's advertising effectiveness or the commission rate is low. The total profit of the supply chain under both distribution modes is smaller than the total profit of the vertically integrated supply chain. When the commission rate is moderate, the manufacturer's choice of the platform modewill lead to Pareto improvement.

Key words: e-commerce platform, supply chain, advertising decision, distribution mode, game

中图分类号:

F224.32

王辰宇, 孙静春. 基于电商平台的供应链广告决策和分销模式研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6): 61-66.

WANG Chen-yu, SUN Jing-chun. AdvertisingDecisions and Distribution Modes in the Supply Chain Based on E-commerce Platform[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2022, 31(6): 61-66.

参考文献

[1] 赵菊,刘龙,王艳,胡小建,李晓征.基于电商平台的供应商竞争和模式选择研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2019,39(8):2058-2069.
[2] 王聪,陈燕,杨德礼.具有自建电商平台的制造商多渠道运营策略研究[J].工业工程与管理,2018,23(2):76-84.
[3] 汪敢甫,艾兴政,钟丽.基于溢出效应与平台服务的竞争网络平台的销售模式研究[J].运筹与管理,2020,29(3):149-157.
[4] Tian L, Vakharia A J, Tan Y R, Xu Y F. Marketplace, reseller, or hybrid: strategic analysis of an emerging e-commerce model[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2018, 27(8): 1595-1610.
[5] Geng X J, Tan Y L, Wei L. How add-on pricing interacts with distribution contracts[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2018, 27(4): 605-623.
[6] Kwark Y, Chen J, Raghunathan S. Platform or wholesale? a strategic tool for online retailers to benefit from third-party information[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2017, 41 (3): 763-785.
[7] Abhishek V, Jerath K, Zhang Z J. Agency selling or reselling? channel structures in electronic retailing[J]. Management Science, 2016, 62(8): 2259-2280.
[8] Hagiu A, Wright J. Marketplace or reseller?[J]. Management Science, 2015, 61(1): 184-203.
[9] 许诗康,廖成林.基于顾客崇洋心理刻板印象的国内品牌产品洋化广告决策[J].中国管理科学,2017,25(7):123-133.
[10] 潘林,周水银,马士华.供应链互补产品广告投入和捆绑销售联合决策研究[J].运筹与管理,2018,27(2):15-25.
[11] Gupta R, Biswas I, Kumar S. Pricing decisions for three-echelon supply chain with advertising and quality effort-dependent fuzzy demand[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2019, 57(9): 2715-2731.
[12] Shi H, Liu Y, Petruzzi N C. Informative advertising in a distribution channel[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, 274(2): 773-787.
[13] 严磊,梅姝娥,仲伟俊,赵江.考虑网购偏好行为的双渠道广告与价格竞争策略[J].系统管理学报,2019,28(2):369-378.
[14] Zhang J, Cao Q, He X. Manufacturer encroachment with advertising[J]. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 2020, 91: 1-18.
[15] 王玉燕,申亮.基于第三方平台销售的E-供应链广告策略研究[J].管理评论,2019,31(10):124-132.
[16] 洪定军,马永开,唐小我.灰色市场条件下基于收益共享契约的供应链协调[J].运筹与管理,2017,26(6):70-80.
[17] 谢鑫鹏,赵道致,刘永军.需求具有碳排放敏感性的低碳供应链收益共享寄售契约[J].系统管理学报,2015,24(1):107-115.
[18] 刘涓钰.供应链回购契约与收益共享契约研究综述[J].商业经济研究,2013,7:38-39.
[19] Zhou Y W, Li J C, Zhong Y G. Cooperative advertising and ordering policies in a two-echelon supply chain with risk-averse agents[J]. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 2018, 75: 97-117.
[20] Jorgensen S, ZaccourG. A survey of game-theoretic models of cooperative advertising[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 237(1): 1-14.
[21] 陈国鹏,张旭梅,肖剑.双渠道供应链中制造商与零售商合作广告协调模型[J].系统管理学报,2017,26(6):1168-1175.
[22] Lu Q H, Shi V, Huang J Z. Who benefit from agency model: a strategic analysis of pricing models in distribution channels of physical books and e-books[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2018, 264(3): 1074-1091.
[23] Dantas C D, TaboubiS, Zaccour G. Which business model for e-book pricing?[J]. Economics Letters, 2014, 125(1): 126-129.
[24] Tan Y R, Carrillo J E, Cheng H K. The agency model for digital goods[J]. Decision Sciences, 2016, 47(4): 628-660.
[25] Xie J X, Wei J C. Coordinating advertising and pricing in a manufacturer-retailer channel[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 197(2): 785-791.
[26] Kunter M. Coordination via cost and revenue sharing in manufacturer-retailer channels[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 216(2): 477-486.
[27] Lu F X, Tang W S, Liu G W, Zhang J X. Cooperative advertising: a way escaping from the prisoner's dilemma in a supply chain with sticky price[J]. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 2019, 86: 87-106.
[28] Pnevmatikos N, Vardar B, Zaccour G. When should a retailer invest in brand advertising?[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, 267(2): 754-764.

基于电商平台的供应链广告决策和分销模式研究

AdvertisingDecisions and Distribution Modes in the Supply Chain Based on E-commerce Platform

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	苏屹, 魏仕鹏. 基于三方博弈的绿色技术创新演化研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6): 40-47.
[2]	郑文军, 王勇. 新零售背景下生鲜超市的演化博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6): 48-55.
[3]	张新立, 田英楠, 王嘉琪. 基于异质预期的量子伯川德博弈复杂动力机制分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6): 56-60.
[4]	张子健, 何清. 产品显性防伪技术(OACT)投资的供应链决策机制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6): 67-73.
[5]	程明宝, 王影, 邹美萍, 后锐. 考虑消费者具有质量和价格偏好的双渠道供应链最优决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6): 74-81.
[6]	徐琪, 杨玉莹. 基于双边平台匹配努力的共享供应链动态定价策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6): 82-90.
[7]	刘家国, 赵爱翔, 崔进. 考虑创新投入的OEM/ODM供应链结构选择研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6): 98-104.
[8]	张路, 马德青, 胡劲松. 企业社会责任下的旅游供应链低碳运营研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6): 189-195.
[9]	冯颖, 郭洪亚, 高䶮. “公司+农户”型订单农业供应链的政府税收补贴机制[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6): 211-219.
[10]	史欢, 李洪波. “合作”还是“寄生”？考虑政府规制的众创空间创业生态系统共生机制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6): 233-239.
[11]	杨曼, 刘德海. 救援延迟效应如何影响政府企业救灾合作？基于微分博弈的研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(5): 1-7.
[12]	程慧锦, 丁浩. 供应链企业社会责任治理决策研究——基于SD-演化博弈分析法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(5): 14-22.
[13]	赵瑞嘉, 谢新连, 李国栋. 维修保障船与修船厂维修远海受损舰船的定价博弈[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(5): 23-29.
[14]	宾宁, 朱怀念. 基于时滞效应的随机微分投资与比例再保险博弈[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(5): 30-36.
[15]	卢新元, 樊雅睿, 秦泽家, 方文琪. 考虑预订取消率的酒店退订政策选择演化博弈研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(5): 37-42.