运筹与管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10): 44-51.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2025.0307

• 理论分析与方法探讨 • 上一篇    下一篇

生产可替代产品的两制造商竞争合作关系的量子博弈分析

李延晖1, 高焕1, 姚琪2,3, 关旭4   

  1. 1.华中师范大学 信息管理学院,湖北 武汉 430079;
    2.武汉工程大学 管理学院,湖北 武汉 430205;
    3.武汉学院 管理学院,湖北 武汉 430212;
    4.华中科技大学 管理学院,湖北 武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-03 出版日期:2025-10-25 发布日期:2026-02-27
  • 通讯作者: 姚琪(1986-),女,湖北武汉人,博士,教授,研究方向:物流与供应链管理。Email: 25111104@wit.edu.cn。
  • 作者简介:李延晖(1974-),男,湖南衡阳人,博士,教授,研究方向:物流与供应链管理。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(72402167,72325005);湖北省高校优秀中青年科技创新团队项目(T2022056);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(24YJA630043)

Quantum Game Analysis of Competition and Cooperation Relationship between Two Manufacturers Producing Alternative Products

LI Yanhui1, GAO Huan1, YAO Qi2,3, GUAN Xu4   

  1. 1. School of Information Management, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China;
    2. School of Management, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China;
    3. School of Management, Wuhan College, Wuhan 430212, China;
    4. School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
  • Received:2023-08-03 Online:2025-10-25 Published:2026-02-27

摘要: 由于企业间错综复杂的相互影响和作用,供应链成员企业间的合作关系伴随着各种矛盾和竞争,如何保持高质量稳定的供应链合作关系一直是实业界与学术界关注的热点。本文应用量子博弈理论和方法,对两个生产可替代产品的竞争企业间基于关键零部件的合作问题进行研究,旨在揭示量子纠缠机制对建立合作稳定性的影响。研究表明,在考虑纠缠因素后,主动合作的制造商不必再承担“背叛”的风险,一定程度上解决了经典博弈中制造商合作的“囚徒困境”问题。此外,适当增强与具有成本优势的企业的“纠缠”程度,可以减少双方均衡收益的差距。具有成本优势的企业的最佳量子策略是与市场中的竞争者签订批发合作契约,将批发价格作为一种手段来影响无成本优势企业的决策行为。

关键词: 竞合关系, 供应链, 量子博弈, 博弈均衡, 量子纠缠

Abstract: With the development of information globalization and information technology modernization, the adjustment of competition relationship and dynamic integration of resources between enterprises have a profound impact on the performance improvement of enterprises. More and more enterprises gradually realize that in order to survive and develop in fierce competition, they need to break through their own limitations in technology and resources, explore new cooperation methods, and fully utilize market opportunities by uniting external forces or establishing cooperation relationships with other enterprises. At the same time, various forms of cooperation such as information cooperation, technology cooperation and production cooperation have emerged as enterprises explore new ways of cooperation. However, conflicts of individual interests often lead to various contradictions and competitions in cooperation between enterprises, and there are significant differences in the degree of competition and cooperation in different stages, making it difficult to form stable cooperative relationships. How to maintain high-quality and stable supply chain cooperation is still a problem worthy of further research and discussion.
This paper applies quantum game theory and methods to study the problem of cooperative production of competing enterprises based on critical components through mathematical modeling, aiming to reveal the influence of quantum entanglement mechanism on the establishment of rational individual cooperation stability, in order to provide a new method for strategic choice for enterprises in different market positions, and provide a new research idea for achieving“win-win” for enterprises. The main research content and methods of this article are as follows: (1)The quantum game analysis of the competitive and cooperative supply chain formed by manufacturers with independent production capacity around key components is carried out, and the game relationship between the competitive and cooperative behavior of manufacturers and the decision of each parameter are discussed. (2)Four combination models of competition and cooperation strategies of manufacturers in wholesale competition and license competition are constructed respectively, and the changes in quantum entanglement and their effects on revenue and balance are analyzed. (3)This paper uses quantum entanglement to simulate the interest entanglement in competitive relations, obtains the optimal solutions of classical Nash equilibrium and quantum equilibrium, and then compares and analyzes the effects of different entanglement conditions on decision parameters and optimal strategies of manufacturers.
The results show that by introducing manufacturer competition and cooperation into the analysis paradigm of quantum games, and by considering entanglement of states, active-seeking manufacturers for cooperation do not have to bear the risk of “betrayal”. This solves the “prisoner’s dilemma” problem of manufacturer cooperation in classical games to some extent. In addition, appropriately enhancing the “entanglement” with cost-advantaged enterprises can reduce the gap in equilibrium benefits between both parties. Manufacturers with cost advantages can use wholesale prices as a mechanism to influence the cooperation decisions of manufacturers without cost advantages. If a manufacturer has a dominant position in the industry, its optimal quantum strategy is to sign a wholesale cooperation contract with competitors in the market. To induce competitors to cooperate, cost-advantaged manufacturers must offer a lower wholesale price. Therefore, when seeking the best strategy, they face a trade-off between prices, and even if they have a cost advantage, they need to reduce their wholesale prices to attract competitors to cooperate.
There is a lot of room to expand the research of cooperative relationship from the perspective of quantum strategy. In addition to the application of quantum game to the analysis of competition and cooperation strategies based on key components in this paper, we can also consider mapping characteristics such as quantum entanglement and quantum decoherence to the analysis of joint investment and resource development, knowledge and resources sharing, environmental protection and other decisions among enterprises. This helps us better understand strategic choices and outcomes in these complex relationships.

Key words: coopetition relationship, supply chain, quantum game, game equilibrium, quantum entanglement

中图分类号: