跨境水资源竞争制度模型与竞争行为

doi:10.12005/orms.2017.0185

运筹与管理 ›› 2017, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (8): 45-53.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2017.0185

跨境水资源竞争制度模型与竞争行为

郑军¹, 张永庆¹, 王顺林²

1.上海理工大学管理学院, 上海 200093;
2.宁波职业技术学院,浙江宁波 315800

收稿日期:2015-10-12 出版日期:2017-08-25
作者简介:郑军(1972-),男,浙江临海人,博士研究生,研究方向:制度经济,贸易经济;张永庆(1962-),男,黑龙江海伦人,教授,博导,研究方向:区域经济,产业规划;王顺林(1976-),男,河南卫辉人,教授,研究方向:物流管理,区域经济。
基金资助:
教育部人文社科(16YJA630054);浙江省哲学社会科学重点研究基地(15JDXX01YB);上海市一流学科建设项目( S1201YLXK),宁波市软科学(2015A10040,2016A10039)

Competition Models and Competitive Behaviors for Transboundary Water Resources

ZHENG Jun¹, ZHANG Yong-qing¹,WANG Shun-lin²

1.Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China;
2.Ningbo Polytechnic, Ningbo 315800, China

Received:2015-10-12 Online:2017-08-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 全球淡水资源稀缺与分布不平衡导致跨境水资源竞争及水安全问题日趋严峻。为了抑制过度竞争、提高流域整体效用、促进流域合作和引导生态环保行为,提出跨境水资源竞争的三种改进制度。运用制度结构图与数学模型,比较不同制度结构下流域整体效用和各国竞争行为,验证了改进制度的有效性。据此,提出我国参与跨境水资源竞争和管控的策略建议。

关键词: 跨境水资源, 制度结构, 孙氏图, 竞争行为, 竞争均衡点

Abstract: The issues of transboundary water resources competition and water security are receiving increasing attention mainly due to the scarcity and imbalanced distribution of water resources. First, this paper proposes three improved institutional structures, in order to inhibit excessive competition, enhance regional cooperation and utilities, and protect eco-system. Second, by utilizing Sun’s Diagram and mathematical models, the overall utilities within the basin, competitive equilibrium and behaviors are compared under different mechanisms, resulting in validation of these improved institutional structures. Finally, some suggestions are given accordingly for China government engaging in the competition for transboundary water resources.

Key words: transboundary water resources, institutional structure, sun’s diagram, competitive behavior, competitive equilibrium

中图分类号:

F205
X24

郑军, 张永庆, 王顺林. 跨境水资源竞争制度模型与竞争行为[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(8): 45-53.

ZHENG Jun, ZHANG Yong-qing,WANG Shun-lin. Competition Models and Competitive Behaviors for Transboundary Water Resources[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2017, 26(8): 45-53.

参考文献

[1] 韩叶.水权的合法性:国际河流水资源分配中的规范竞争[J].外交评论,2014(05):139-156.
[2] 王卓宇,雷芸.喜马拉雅地区跨国水域水资源开发国际法问题研究[J].中国人口.资源与环境,2015,25(9):131-137.
[3] Gunasekara N K, Kazama S, Yamazaki D, et al. Water conflict risk due to water resource availability and unequal distribution[J]. Water Resources Management, 2014, 28(1): 169-184.
[4] Lucia D S, Mark S, Mark G, et al. Water governance benchmarking: concepts and approach framework as applied to middle east and north africa countries[J]. Water Policy, 2014, 16: 1121-1139.
[5] 窦明,张华侨,靳梦等.基于发展模式驱动的水安全调控模型研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2015,35(9):2443-2448.
[6] Parna P M, Armaghan A E, Reza K. A heuristic evolutionary game theoretic methodology for conjunctive use of surface and groundwater resources[J]. Water Resources Management, 2015, 29(11): 3905-3918.
[7] Mahdi Z, Nasim S, Ferenc S, et al. Nonlinear interval parameter programming combined with cooperative games: a tool for addressing uncertainty in water allocation using water diplomacy framework[J]. Water Resources Management, 2015, 29(12): 4285-4303.
[8] Zorica S, Bojan S. Modelling multicriteria decision making process for sharing benefits from the reservoir at serbia-romania border[J]. Water resources Management, 2014, 28(12): 4001-4018.
[9] Wang X M, Zhou J Z, Ouyang S, et al. Research on joint impoundment dispatching model for cascade reservoir[J]. Water Resour Manage , 2014, (28): 5527-5542.
[10] Yu G, Wang S, Yu Q W. The regional limit of flood-bearing capability: a theoretical model and approaches[J]. Water Resource Manage, 2014(28): 1921-1936.
[11] Olli V, Konrad E, Marko K , Integrated water resources management: horizontal and vertical explorations and the ‘water in all policies’ approach[J]. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 2014, 30(3): 433-444.
[12] Van Koppen B, Schreiner B. Moving beyond integrated water resource management: developmental water management in south africa[J]. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 2014, 30(3): 543-558.
[13] Mirja K, Matti K, Marko K, et al. China’s southbound transboundary river basins: a case of asymmetry[J]. Water International, 2015, 40(1): 113-138.
[14] 赵旭,王桃,周巧琳.我国国际河流水路运输资源开发的外部性及治理途径—以澜沧江-湄公河为例[J].经济问题探索,2014,(11):34-39.
[15] 孙绍荣.制度工程学-孙氏图与五种基本制度结构[M].北京:科学出版社,2015.
[16] Frey F W. The political context of conflict and cooperation over international river basin[J]. Water International, 1993, 18(1): 54-68.
[17] 武春友,赵宇哲. 基于二层规划的流域水资源交易决策模型[J].运筹与管理,2011,20(3):30-37.
[18] Paisley R K, Taylor W H. Transboundary governance of the nile river basin: past, present and future[J]. Environmental Development, 2013, (7): 59-71.

跨境水资源竞争制度模型与竞争行为

Competition Models and Competitive Behaviors for Transboundary Water Resources

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	王旭坪, 于秀丽, 王天腾. 基于集成学习策略的化工园区大气污染影响预测[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 127-134.
[2]	郁培丽, 石俊国, 窦姗姗, 孙广生. 技术创新、溢出效应与最优环境政策组合[J]. 运筹与管理, 2014, 23(5): 237-242.
[3]	张立军, 高春晓. 基于k-means聚类与粗糙集算法的指标筛选方法研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(12): 8-12.
[4]	王磊宁, 郑云虹, 赵瑞. 基于EPR政策的耐用品设计寿命的决策研究——从计划报废的视角[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(12): 51-58.
[5]	潘峰, 刘月, 王琳. 公众参与视角下的央地环境规制博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(6): 113-123.
[6]	高明, 廖梦灵. 雾霾治理中的协作机制研究:基于演化博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(5): 152-160.
[7]	余鹏, 马珩, 周福礼. 基于级差最大化组合赋权TOPSIS灰关联投影法的区域碳效率动态评价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(12): 170-177.
[8]	柳歆, 孟卫东. 公众参与下中央与地方政府环保行为演化博弈研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(8): 19-26.
[9]	汪明月,刘宇,钟超,李梦明,史文强. 区域合作减排策略选择及提升对策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(5): 35-45.
[10]	程兴群,金淳. 低碳政策下考虑道路拥堵的多式联运路径选择问题[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(4): 67-77.
[11]	江玉国,淳伟德. 一种动态评价法在钢铁企业低碳竞争力评价中的应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(12): 166-171.
[12]	潘峰, 王琳. 中国式分权下地方政府环境规制执行研究——以排污收费为例[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(2): 152-158.
[13]	刘青, 王文平, 李敏. 基于“黑箱”问题的政府碳排放调控政策设计及影响分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(2): 17-24.
[14]	潘峰, 王琳. 环境治理中的政府监查与企业治污行为研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(2): 93-99.
[15]	许士春,何正霞,龙如银,张文文. 排放税与排放标准的经济效率分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2016, 25(2): 165-172.