高校科研团队领导内隐追随的维度与量表开发——基于KAQ理论的维度构建方法

doi:10.12005/orms.2020.0219

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 内隐追随是西方管理学中的一个新兴研究议题。相对于西方已有的内隐追随维度研究,以及我国学者对内隐追随结构维度的本土化研究,目前以高等学校为研究背景,以高校科研团队领导为研究对象的内隐追随结构维度的研究还较为匮乏。基于KAQ理论,在归纳高校科研团队领导者内隐追随特征的基础上,提出其结构维度的理论框架,并利用SPSS 20.0和Mplus7.4分别对高校科研团队内隐追随结构维度进行探索性和验证性因素分析,最后,对所开发的量表进行预测效度和增量效度的检验。结果表明,高校科研团队领导内隐追随包括原型和反原型两大维度,每个维度还包括知识、能力、素质原型与反原型六个子维度。同时,也验证了该量表具有较好的预测效度和增量效度。最后,阐述结论、研究贡献以及研究的局限性和未来研究的展望,以供高校领导发展计划领域研究学者参考。

关键词: 高校科研团队, 领导内隐追随, KAQ理论, 量表开发

Abstract: Implicit followership is a new topic in western management. Compared with the existing implicit followership dimension from the west and our country, there is still lack in implicit followership dimension of university research team leader, taking the university as the background at present. Based on the theory of KAQ, this paper summarizes the characteristics of university research team leader implicit followership and puts forward theoretical framework of university research team leader implicit followership. By using the software of SPSS 20.0 and Mplus 7.4, this paper makes an exploratory factor and confirmatory analysis of university research team leader implicit followership. Finally, this paper tests the predictive validity and incremental validity of the scale. The results show that university research team leader implicit followership contains two dimensions, prototype and anti-prototype. Each dimension also includes six sub-dimensions, prototype and anti-prototype of knowledge, ability and quality. Meanwhile, this paper also verifies the scale has excellent criterion and incremental validity. Finally, this paper makes a conclusion, discusses the theory contribution, analyzes the limitation and looks into the future research direction in order to provide university leader development strategies for researchers.

Key words: university research team, leader implicit followership, KAQ, scale development

中图分类号:

王磊. 高校科研团队领导内隐追随的维度与量表开发——基于KAQ理论的维度构建方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(8): 222-232.

WANG Lei. Dimensions and Scale Development of Implicit Followership of University Research Team Leadership-Based on the Theory of KAQ[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(8): 222-232.

参考文献

[1] Bass B M. Leadership and performance beyond expectations[M]. New York: Free Press, 1985.
[2] Sy T. What do you think of followers? examining the content, structure, and consequences of implicit followership theories[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2010, 113(2): 73-84.
[3] Mohamadzadeh Z, Mortazavi S, Lagzian M, et al. Toward an exploration of follower's implicit followership theories of mashhad's large organizations using a qualitative approach[J]. Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 2015, 8(3): 397-419.
[4] Alipour K K, Mohammed S, Martinez P N. Incorporating temporality into implicit leadership and followership theories: exploring inconsistencies between time-based expectations and actual behavior[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2017(28): 300-316.
[5] Carsten M K, Uhl-Bien M, West B J, et al. Exploring social constructions of followership: a qualitative study[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2010, 21(3): 543-562.
[6] Junker N M, Stegmann S, Braun S, et al. The ideal and the counter-ideal follower-advancing implicit followership theories[J]. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 2016, 37(8): 1205-1222.
[7] Kong M, Xu H Y, Zhou A Q, et al. Implicit followership theory to employee creativity: the roles of leader-member exchange, self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation[J]. Journal of Management and Organization, 2019, 25(1): 81-95.
[8] Epitropaki O, Sy T, Martin R, et al. Implicit leadership and followership theories “in the wild”: taking stock of information-rocessing approaches to leadership and followership in organizational settings[J]. The Leadeship Quaterly, 2013, 24(6): 858-881.
[9] Yip J. How implicit assumptions about followers shape the mentoring behavior of top executives[R]. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2013.
[10] 杨红玲,彭坚.内隐追随理论研究述评[J].外国经济与管理,2015,37(3):16-26.
[11] 祝振兵,罗文豪.中国组织情境下的内隐追随:内容、结构与测量[J].江西社会科学,2017(3):235-244.
[12] 郭衍宏,兰玲.中国情境下内隐追随理论的建构与测量[J].中国人力资源开发,2017(7):25-37.
[13] 林畅,宋姣.高校与企业人力资源管理之比较[J].三峡大学学报(人文社会科学版),2010,32(6):108-110.
[14] 孔茗,钱小军.被领导者“看好”的员工其行为也一定好吗？——内隐追随对员工行为的影响[J].心理学报,2015,47(9):1162-1171.
[15] 彭坚,王霄.与上司“心有灵犀”会让你的工作更出色吗？——追随原型一致性、工作投入与工作绩效[J].心理学报,2016,48(9):1151-1162.
[16] 祝振兵,罗文豪,曹元坤.领导会视谁为圈内人？内隐追随与领导—成员交换关系研究[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(11):140-146.
[17] 姜仁贵,吴文平,余梁蜀,朱记伟,程圣东.基于KAQ的工程管理专业人才培养模式研究[J].教学研究,2018,41(3):21-25.
[18] Yuan Kong. A study of the current situation and countermeasures of medical english talents training based on KAQ education mode[J]. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2018, 8(6): 694-701.
[19] 刘景裕,王元华,樊新.普通高校体育教师“KAQ”综合评价指标体系研究[J].中国体育科技,2003,39(3):22-24.
[20] Zalaghi H, Khazaei M. The role of deductive and inductive reasoning in accounting research and standard setting[J]. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 2016, 8(1): 227-241.
[21] Sauce B, Matzel L D.. Inductive reasoning[M]. Springer International Publishing, 2017. 1-8.
[22] Lai V S, Li H. Technology acceptance model for internet banking: an invariance analysis[J]. Information & Management, 2005, 42(2): 373-386.
[23] 侯杰泰,温忠麟,成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用[M].经济科学出版社,2004.
[24] Gilbert A, Churchill J. A paradigm for developing better measure of marketing constructs[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1979, 16(2): 64-73.
[25] Podsakoff P M, MacKenzie S B, Lee J Y, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88(5): 879-903.
[26] Graen G B, Uhl-bien M. Relationship-based approach to leadership: development of leader-member exchange(LMX)theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 1995, 6(2): 219-247.
[27] Organ D W. Organizational citizenship behavior: the good syndrome[M]. Lexington, MA, England: Lexington Books, 1988.
[28] Borman W C, Brush D H. More progress toward a taxonomy of managerial performance requirements[J]. Human Performance, 1993, 6(1): 1-21.
[29] Graf M M, Quaquebeke N V, Dick R V. Two independent value orientations: ideal-and counter-ideal leader values and their impact on followers' respect for and identification with their leaders[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2011, 104(2): 185-195.
[30] Van d W S C. Incremental validity of work-related sense of coherence in predicting work wellness[J]. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 2018, 44(1): 1-7.
[31] Hunsley J, Meyer G J. The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues[J]. Psychological Assessment, 2003, 15(4): 446-455.