Evaluation Model and Empirical Research on the Core Competitiveness of Software Service Outsourcing Industry Based on the Combination Weighting by Maximizing the Minimum Distance

Abstract

Abstract: Evaluating objectively core competitiveness of software service outsourcing industry and extracting key factors can not only help to find the problems, but also provide the policies for the industry development. According to the connotation of industry core competitiveness and the diamond model theory, this paper proposes an evaluation indicators system for core competitiveness of software service outsourcing industry. An optimization model calculating the combination weights of indicators is proposed by maximizing the minimum distance between the evaluation values of the different cities subject to the information from different weighting methods. Based on the evaluation indicators system and the combination weighting method, this paper makes an empirical analysis of 18 cities. The optimization weighting model can distinguish one evaluation object from the other better and solve the problem of discordant ranks from the different weighting methods.

Key words: system evaluation, evaluation model, combination weighting, maximizing the minimum distance, software service outsourcing industry

摘要： 正确评价我国软件服务外包产业核心竞争力并提取关键影响因素,有利于找出产业发展中存在的问题,也为制定产业发展政策提供可靠依据。根据产业核心竞争力内涵,基于钻石模型,构建了软件服务外包产业核心竞争力评价指标体系,通过评价值最小差距最大化组合赋权方法计算多种权重的组合权重,并对我国典型的18个城市软件服务外包产业核心竞争力进行实证分析。最小差距最大化组合赋权模型消除了在不同赋权方法下评价排序不一致的缺陷,并最大程度地区分了评价结果之间的差距,提高了评价结果的科学性和可靠性

关键词: 系统评价, 评价模型, 组合赋权, 最小差距最大化, 软件服务外包产业

CLC Number:

N945.16

JIANG Yu-xi, WU Lei, GE Ji-ping. Evaluation Model and Empirical Research on the Core Competitiveness of Software Service Outsourcing Industry Based on the Combination Weighting by Maximizing the Minimum Distance[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2014, 23(4): 158-166.

姜昱汐, 吴雷, 葛继平. 最小差距最大化组合赋权的软件服务外包产业核心竞争力评价模型及实证[J]. 运筹与管理, 2014, 23(4): 158-166.

References

[1] IMD. The world competitive yearbook[R]. Lausanne: IMD, 2012.
[2] WEF. 2011-2012 the global competitiveness report[R]. Geneva: WEF, 2011.
[3] UNIDO. Industrial development report 2002/2003: competing through innovation and learning[R]. Vienna: UNIDO, 2003.
[4] Michael Porter E. Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance[M]. New York: Free Press, 1985.
[5] 管晓燕.山东省软件产业竞争力评价[D].济南:山东大学,2006.
[6] 焦晓阳.辽宁省软件产业竞争力评价[D].大连:东北财经大学,2010.
[7] 赵枫.软件和信息服务业竞争力评价指标体系研究——基于中国服务外包基地的评价[D].大连:东北财经大学,2010.
[8] 贾建莉.西安软件产业竞争力综合评价研究[D].西安:西北工业大学,2005.
[9] 胥艾.大连市服务外包竞争力研究[D].大连:大连海事大学,2011.
[10] Wang Tienchin, Lee Hsien Da. Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36(5): 8980-8985.
[11] 李刚,迟国泰.级差最大化组合赋权的人的全面发展评价模型及实证[J].中国软科学,2009,(9):147-155.
[12] 姜昱汐,迟国泰,严丽俊.基于最大熵原理的线性组合赋权方法[J].运筹与管理,2011,20(1):53-59.
[13] Ma Jian, Fan Zhiping, Huang Lihua. A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999, 112(2): 397-404.
[14] Xu Xiaozhan. A note on the subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 156(2): 530-532.
[15] 王力,刘春生,黄育华.中国服务外包发展报告(2010~2011)——中国服务外包竞争力评价(2011版)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2011.
[16] 丁磊.中国软件外包产业的国际竞争力研究[D].北京:首都经济贸易大学,2010.
[17] 李兴斯.非线性极大极小问题的一个有效解法[J].科学通报,1991,36:1448-1450.
[18] 胡立华.基于DEA/AHP方法的自行火炮作战效能评估[J].火力与指挥控制,2010,(5): 55-57.
[19] 李刚,迟国泰,程砚秋.基于熵权TOPSIS的人的全面发展评价模型及实证[J].系统工程学报,2011,26(3):400-407.
[20] 王昆,宋海洲.三种客观权重赋权法的比较分析[J].技术经济与管理研究,2003,(6):48-49.
[21] 张丽丽,张培爱,李兴斯.关于熵函数法中的几个问题[J].运筹与管理,2009,18(3):74-77