System Dynamics Model of Coupling Evolution between Quality Culture Transmission and Project Management Behavior

doi:10.12005/orms.2016.0105

Operations Research and Management Science ›› 2016, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (3): 217-224.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2016.0105

• Application Research • Previous Articles Next Articles

System Dynamics Model of Coupling Evolution between Quality Culture Transmission and Project Management Behavior

ZHU Zhen-tao¹, ZHOU Jing², CHEN Xing-guang², LI Qian²

1.School of Economics and Management, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211167, China;
2.School of Management and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China

Received:2014-07-16 Online:2016-06-25

质量文化传播与工程管理行为耦合演化的系统动力学模型研究

朱振涛¹,周晶²,陈星光²,李迁²

1.南京工程学院经济与管理学院,江苏南京 211167;
2.南京大学工程管理学院,江苏南京 210093

作者简介:朱振涛(1974-),男,浙江余姚人,博士,副教授,研究方向为企业系统工程和复杂性管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目(70831002);国家自然科学基金(青年基金)(71101069);江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK2012305);教育部人文社科项目(12YJCZH017);南京工程学院校级科研基金(ZKJ201306)

Abstract

Abstract: In this paper, the dynamic characteristics of quality cultural construction in mage-projects are analyzed. A coupling evolution system dynamics model of megaproject is put forward, including four main modules: quality culture transmission, work flow, staff assignment, and schedule pressure, to understand the coupling evolution mechanism of quality culture construction, project management practices, and project performance. Simulation results show that some management measure may cause failure of quality culture construction and poor project performance due to the ignorance of ripple effects triggered by management actions, By taking into account rework loops and other dynamic feedbacks in large scale projects, this model can give project managers some useful guidance on how to comprehend the dynamic complexity of quality culture.

Key words: management engineering, dynamic complexity, system dynamics, quality culture transmission

摘要： 为了研究质量文化建设与工程管理行为以及工程绩效的耦合演化规律,对大型工程中的质量文化建设的动态特性进行了分析,运用系统动力学构建了包括质量文化传播、工作流程、人员调配以及进度压力这四个主要模块相互整合的大型工程耦合演化系统模型。系统仿真的结果表明一些管理行为因忽视了其引发的涟漪效应,导致了质量文化建设和工程建设的失败,而该模型考虑了大型工程存在的返工回路等多种动态反馈,能够帮助工程管理者理解质量文化建设存在的动态复杂性。

关键词: 管理工程, 动态复杂性, 系统动力学, 质量文化传播

CLC Number:

C936
N941.3

ZHU Zhen-tao, ZHOU Jing, CHEN Xing-guang, LI Qian. System Dynamics Model of Coupling Evolution between Quality Culture Transmission and Project Management Behavior[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2016, 25(3): 217-224.

朱振涛,周晶,陈星光,李迁. 质量文化传播与工程管理行为耦合演化的系统动力学模型研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2016, 25(3): 217-224.

References

[1] 肖峰.从魁北克大桥垮塌的文化成因看工程文化的价值[J].自然辩证法通讯,2006,28(5):12-18.
[2] Kanji G K, Wong A. Quality culture in the construction industry[J]. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 1998, 9(4): 133-140.
[3] Sommerville J, Stocks R K, Robertson H W. Cultural dynamics for quality: the polar plot model[J]. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 1999, 10(4): 725-732.
[4] Ankrah N A, Proverbs D, Debrah Y. Factors influencing the culture of a construction project organisation[J]. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2009, 16(1): 26-47.
[5] 佘立中.基于复杂性大型集群工程项目质量管理研究[J].重庆建筑大学学报,2006,28(3):107-109.
[6] 李存斌,陆龚曙.工程项目风险元传递的系统动力学模型[J].系统工程理论与实践,2013,32(12):2731-2739.
[7] Park M, Pena-Mora F. Dynamic change management for construction: introducing the change cycle into model-based project management[J]. System Dynamics Review, 2003, 19(3): 213-242.
[8] Lyneis J M, Cooper K G, Els S A. Strategic management of complex projects: a case study using system dynamics[J]. System Dynamics Review, 2001, 17(3): 237-260.
[9] Lyneis J M, Ford D N. System dynamics applied to project management: a survey, assessment, and directions for future research[J]. System Dynamics Review, 2007, 23(2-3): 157-189.
[10] Taylor T, Ford D N. Tipping point failure and robustness in single development projects[J]. System Dynamics Review, 2006, 22(1): 51-71.
[11] Ulli-Beer S, Gassmann F, Bosshardt M, et al. Generic structure to simulate acceptance dynamics[J]. System Dynamics Review, 2010, 26(2): 89-116.
[12] 张艺军.企业文化演化的复杂性研究[J].科技创业月刊,2008,21(011):118-119.
[13] Sterman J. Business dynamics[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 2000.
[14] Ford D N, Bhargav S. Project management quality and the value of flexible strategies[J]. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2006, 13(3): 275-289.
[15] Taylor T, Ford D N. Managing tipping point dynamics in complex construction projects[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2008, 134: 421.
[16] Ford D N, Sterman J D. Overcoming the 90% syndrome: iteration management in concurrent development projects[J]. Concurrent Engineering, 2003, 11(3): 177.
[17] Brooks Jr F P. The mythical man-month (anniversary ed.)[M]. Boston, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., 1995.

System Dynamics Model of Coupling Evolution between Quality Culture Transmission and Project Management Behavior

质量文化传播与工程管理行为耦合演化的系统动力学模型研究

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	FU Xiao-yong, ZHU Qing-hua, TIAN Yi-hui. Evolutionary Game Analysis of Government and Dissembling Enterprises Based on The System Dynamics [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(7): 83-88.
[2]	CHEN Zhen, ZHANG Kang-hui, JIA Shu-wei. “Green Paradox” Effect of New-energy Vehicles Based on System Dynamics [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(3): 232-239.
[3]	CHEN Zhen, ZAN Zhe, JIA Shu-wei. Effect of Urban Traffic Restriction Policy Based on SD-VF Approach [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(11): 190-196.
[4]	PENG Pin, HE Xi-tu. Government Subsidies and Development of New Energy Vehicle Industry ——Evolutionary Game Analysis Based on System Dynamics [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(10): 31-38.
[5]	ZHU Hui-qi, HOU Han-ping. Using System Dynamics to Assess the Impact of Object Identifier-UnifiedDegree on Logistics Resource Integration [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(7): 72-80.
[6]	JIA Shu-wei, YAN Guang-le. Research on the Traffic Congestion Charging Fee Model inUrban Areas Based on SD-GM Approach [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(7): 160-168.
[7]	CHENG Min, LIU Ya-qun, WANG Hong-qiang. An Evolutionary Game Analysis on the PPP projects of NIMBY Facility Based on System Dynamics [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(10): 40-49.
[8]	LI Lin, YUAN Ye, LIU Hong. Evolutionary Game Laws Used by Collaborative Innovation Subjects and the Simulation of Government Intervention [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2018, 27(6): 14-20.
[9]	WEN Xin, JIA Jun-xiu. Co-creation Value Mechanism and Strategy Research of Customer Participation in R&D Process [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2018, 27(11): 105-114.
[10]	JI Ya-min, QI Ming-liang, JING Qi. Study on Decontamination Equipment Allocation during Off-site Nuclear Emergency Based on System Dynamics [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2018, 27(1): 1-6.
[11]	YU Hai-ying, JIANG Ming-hui. Analysis of Influence Mechanism of Industrial Cluster on Enterprise Performance Based on System Dynamics Model [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2017, 26(9): 166-175.
[12]	ZHANG Bao-jian, PEI Meng-dan , SUN Guo-qiang, CHEN Mei. Dynamic Matching of Entrepreneurial Process and Incubation Resources [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2017, 26(8): 146-156.
[13]	QI Er-shi, LI Tian-bo, LIU Liang, ZHAO Yun-xiang, QIAO Guo-tong. The Evolutionary Game Analysis of the Sharing of Manufacturing Resource in the Environment of Cloud Manufacturing [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2017, 26(2): 25-34.
[14]	CHENG Min, LIU Cai-qing. Evolutionary Game Analysis of the Behavioral Options during Demolition Process Based on System Dynamics [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2017, 26(2): 35-41.
[15]	YANG Hua-long, YE Di, ZHANG Qian, ZENG Qing-cheng. Disruption Management Model and Algorithm for Vehicle Scheduling with Time Window Changes [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2017, 26(10): 56-64.