Is Regional Industrial Development and Resource Endowment Synergistic? ——Based on Industry, Elements and Technical Resources

doi:10.12005/orms.2019.0000

Abstract

Abstract: In the post-industrial era, through regional resource allocation optimization, promoting regional industrial development and improving industrial output efficiency and regional resource allocation efficiency have become a key issue. Based on the Cobb Douglas production function, using Cutting-edge Technical Efficiency Measurement and Industrial Input-output Analysis, we construct a model about the efficient measure of industrial production, study the role of regional resources in industrial development, and identify the technical efficiency of industrial development, the efficiency of regional industrial resource allocation and element resource allocation in various regions. The research can provide a theoretical guidance for the design of industrial development strategies and models. The results show that regional resource endowment is highly correlated with industrial development, and regional land, capital elements, government services and agricultural development have a significant effect on industrial development. However, the endowment of labor element and the development of the other industries(such as wholesale industry, construction industry, etc.)and out-of-region resource endowment have negative correlation with industrial development. Measuring different regions, we find that current industrial and resource endowments do not cooperate in some regions; industrial development does not make good use of regional resources and regional resource endowments fail to achieve the industry’s role in boosting. Moreover, regional resource endowment fails to promote industrial development. Therefore, based on the use of natural resources in different regions, we optimize the spatial layout of industrial development and the resource allocation model for industrial development. Furthermore, achieving rational industrial development can ensure efficient use of resources and promote stable and rapid economic growth.

Key words: industrial development, resource endowment, industry, synergistic

摘要： 在后工业化时代,如何通过区域资源配置优化推动区域工业发展,提高工业产出效率和区域资源配置效率成为了关键问题。在柯布道格拉斯生产函数的基础上,利用相对前沿技术效率测度、产业投入产出分析、构建区域资源对工业生产带动效应的测度模型,探索区域资源对工业发展的拉动作用,识别各地区工业发展的技术效率、区域产业资源配置效率和要素资源配置效率,能够对工业发展战略和模式的设计提供理论指引。结果表明:区域资源禀赋与工业发展显著相关,区域土地、资本要素、政府服务和农业发展对工业发展拉动效果明显,而劳动力要素禀赋、其他产业(如批发业、建筑业等)发展及区域外资源禀赋对工业发展起负向影响;分地区来看,当前业与资源禀赋不协同;工业发展未能较好的利用区域资源,区域资源禀赋也未能实现对工业的拉动作用,应该根据各地区资源禀赋的使用情况,对工业发展的空间布局、工业发展的资源配置模式进行优化,从而实现工业合理发展,保证资源使用高效率和促进经济平稳、快速增长。

关键词: 工业发展, 资源禀赋, 产业, 协同

CLC Number:

F202

WANG Hong-yu, LIU Kan, FAN De-cheng. Is Regional Industrial Development and Resource Endowment Synergistic? ——Based on Industry, Elements and Technical Resources[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(5): 117-123.

王宏宇,刘刊,范德成. 地区工业发展与资源禀赋协同吗？——基于产业、要素、技术资源的视角[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(5): 117-123.

References

[1] 洪俊杰,刘志强,黄薇.区域振兴战略与中国工业空间结构变动——对中国工业企业调查数据的实证分析[J].经济研究,2014,(8): 72-83.
[2] 张斌,茅锐.工业赶超与经济结构失衡[J].中国社会科学,2016,(3):99-101.
[3] 谢子远,吴丽娟.产业集聚水平与中国工业企业创新效率——基于20个工业行业2000~2012年面板数据的实证研究[J].科研管理,2017,(1):55-68.
[4] 徐瑛.中国四类地区工业用地供给研究——来自新经济地理学的解释[J].经济理论与经济管理,2015,(11):87-96.
[5] 童健,刘伟,薛景.环境规制、要素投入结构与工业行业转型升级[J].经济研究,2016,(7):41-55.
[6] 史学贵,施洁.基础设施、空间溢出与工业效率——基于环渤海、长三角与珠三角区域的比较[J].经济经纬,2014,(2):12-18.
[7] Bao Fang . Water resources constraint force on urbanizatio n in water deficient regions: a case study of the hex corridor, arid area of NWChina[J]. Ecological Economics, 2016. 1-10.
[8] Lange A, Quaas M F. Economic geogra-phy and the effect of environmental pollution on agglomeration[J]. Journal of Economic, 2015. 152-178.
[9] Auty. Natural resources, capital a ccumulat ion and the resource curse[J] . Ecological Economics, 2016. 128-149.
[10] 金碚.中国经济发展新常态研究[J].中国工业经济,2015,(1):5-18.
[11] Gylfason T, Zoega G. Natural resources and economic growth: the role of investment”[J]. The World Economy, 2016, 29: 1091-1115.
[12] Lee C. “Energy consumption and GDP in developing countries: a cointegrated panel analysis”[J]. Energy Economics, 2015, 27(3): 415-427.
[13] Apergis N, Payne J E. “Energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from the commonwealth ofIndependentStates”[J]. Energy Economics, 2014, 31(3): 641-647.
[14] 姚毓春,范欣,张舒婷.资源富集地区:资源禀赋与区域经济增长[J].管理世界,2014,(7):172-173.
[15] 赵爱栋,马贤磊,曲福田,许实.基于资源价值显化视角的中国工业用地市场发育水平及其影响因素[J].资源科学,2016,(2).
[16] 黄群慧.论中国工业的供给侧结构性改革[J].中国工业经济,2016,(9).
[17] 王惠,卞艺杰,王树乔.李小聪.地理禀赋、对外贸易与工业技术创新效率——基于面板分位数的经验分析[J].管理评论,2017,(3):69-82.
[18] 王娟,赵涛,张啸.2006~2012年中国工业行业能源和环境综合效率及其影响因素[J].资源科学,2016,(2):81-93.
[19] 陈林,罗莉娅,康妮.行政垄断与要素价格扭曲——基于中国工业全行业数据与内生性视角的实证检验[J].中国工业经济,2016,(1):75-86.
[20] 于津平,吴小康.战略性新兴产业发展中的区域竞争与地方政府补贴[J].经济理论与经济管理,2016,(3):101-112.
[21] 张虎,韩爱华,杨青龙.中国制造业与生产性服务业协同集聚的空间效应分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2017,(2):3-20.
[22] 赵书虹.中国制造业产业间贸易比较优势及其要素禀赋的实证检验[J].统计与决策,2014,(13):128-131.
[23] 韩淑娟.资源禀赋对中国人口城市化发展的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,(7):52-58.
[24] 刘航,孙早.有偏技术进步与工业产能过剩——基于开放格局的供给侧改革[J].经济学家,2017,(1):87-96.
[25] 贾润崧,张四灿.中国省际资本存量与资本回报率[J].统计研究,2014,(11):35-42.
[26] 戴翔,刘梦,任志成.劳动力演化如何影响中国工业发展:转移还是转型[J].中国工业经济,2016,(9):92-103.
[27] 金碚.工业的使命和价值——中国产业转型升级的理论逻辑[J].中国工业经济,2014,(9):79-92.