需求信息不对称下多渠道供应链的协调定价

doi:10.12005/orms.2015.0043

运筹与管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 44-50.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2015.0043

需求信息不对称下多渠道供应链的协调定价

于丽娟, 李雪, 祝爱民

沈阳工业大学管理学院,辽宁沈阳 110870

收稿日期:2012-06-19 出版日期:2015-04-12
作者简介:于丽娟(1970-),女,副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向:战略管理与市场营销。
基金资助:
辽宁省科技计划重点项目(2010401037)

Coordination Pricing in Multi-channels Supply Chain with Asymmetric Demand Information

YU Li-juan, LI Xue, ZHU Ai-min

School of Management, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang110870, China

Received:2012-06-19 Online:2015-04-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对由一个制造商和一个零售商组成的两层供应链,其中制造商拥有网络直销渠道和传统零售渠道组成的多渠道问题,运用stackelberg博弈分别进行了制造商和零售商需求信息不对称时二者集中控制和分散控制时的最优定价分析,结果表明分散控制会降低供应链的总体效率,继而为了提高多渠道供应链的效率,通过数量折扣模型对多渠道供应链进行协调定价,最后进行了算例验证及有效性分析,结果表明数量折扣模型能使多渠道供应链中的制造商和传统零售商达到双赢,它是合理有效的。

关键词: 企业管理, 协调定价, stackelberg博弈, 数量折扣, 需求信息不对称, 多渠道供应链

Abstract: In recent years, with e-commerce widely used, direct channel has been developed fastly. Many enterprises begin to increase direct channel on the basis of traditional retailing channel. To the problem of one-manufacturer one-retailer supply chain with asymmetric demand information between the two members,the manufacturer owns multi-channels composed by direct channel and traditional retailing channel. This paper analyzes the optimal wholesale price of the manufacturer and retailer when they centralize control and decentralized control with stackelberg Game Theory separately, and the result shows that decentralized control can lower the efficiency of the supply chain. To improve the efficiency of the multi-channels supply chain, we provide the manufacturer with a quantity-discount pricing policy that can coordinate the multi-channels supply chain price. Lastly we use the numerical test and effectiveness analysis, and the result shows that quantity-discount can make the manufacturer and retailer in the supply chain win-win, so it is reasonable and effective.

Key words: business management, coordination pricing, stackelberg game, quantity-discount, asymmetric demand information, multi-channels supply chain

中图分类号:

F274

于丽娟, 李雪, 祝爱民. 需求信息不对称下多渠道供应链的协调定价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(2): 44-50.

YU Li-juan, LI Xue, ZHU Ai-min. Coordination Pricing in Multi-channels Supply Chain with Asymmetric Demand Information[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2015, 24(2): 44-50.

参考文献

[1] Friberg R, Ganslandt M, Sandstrom M. Pricing strategies in e-commerce: bricks vs. click[R]. Working paper, Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden, 2001. 559-582.
[2] Pan X, Shankar V, Ratchford B T. Price competition between pure play vs. bricks-and-clicks e-tailers: Analytical model and empirical analysis[R]. Working paper, Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, 2002. 29-61.
[3] 蔡津,张正华.基于博弈论的电子商务零售商与传统零售商的价格竞争模型[J].上海理工大学学报,2001,23(1):71-74.
[4] 陈云,王浣尘,沈惠璋.电子商务零售商与传统零售商的价格竞争研究[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2006,23(1):35-41.
[5] Cattani K D, Gilland W G, Swaminathan J M. Coordinating traditional and internet supply chains[A]. Simchi-Levi D, Wu D, Shen M,(eds.) .Supply chain analysis in the ebusiness era[C].Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, 2004. 643-675.
[6] Cattani K, Gilland W, Heese H S. Boiling frogs: pricing strategies for a manufacturer adding a direct channel that competes with the traditional channel[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2006, 15(1): 40-56.
[7] Chiang W K, Chhajed D, Hess J D. Direct marketing, indirect profits: a strategic analysis of dual channel supply-Chain design[J]. Management Science, 2003, 49(1): 1-20.
[8] Yao D Q, Liu J J. Competitive pricing of mixed retail and e-tail distribution channels[J]. Omega, 2005, 33(3): 235-247.
[9] Dumrongsiri A, Fan M, Jain A, et al.. A supply Chain model with direct and retail channels[J]. European Journal of Operational Research. 2008, 187(3): 691-718.
[10] Mukhopadhyay S K, Yao D Q, Yue X H. Information sharing of value-adding retailer in a mixed channel Hi-tech supply Chain[J]. Journal of Business Research. 2008, 61(9): 950-958.
[11] Li L. Information sharing in a supply chain with horizontal competition[J]. Management Science, 2002, 48(9): 1196-1212.
[12] 艾兴政,唐小我,马永开.传统渠道与电子渠道预测信息分享的绩效研究[J].管理科学学报,2008,11(1):12-21.
[13] 王虹,倪卫涛,周晶.非对称信息下双渠道供应链的定价决策[J].管理学报,2010,7(2):238-242.
[14] 周永务,杨善林.基于不对称需求信息的供应链协调定价[J].系统工程学报,2006,21(6):591-597.
[15] 李爱国,覃征,鲍复民.粒子群优化算法[J].计算机工程与应用,2002,38(21):1-3.

需求信息不对称下多渠道供应链的协调定价

Coordination Pricing in Multi-channels Supply Chain with Asymmetric Demand Information

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	谭春桥, 吴欣, 周丽. 考虑公平关切的O2O模式下物流服务供应链定价策略博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(9): 80-85.
[2]	刘浪, 黄冬宏, 逄金辉. 多因素干扰下的供应链最优定价与订货决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(9): 113-121.
[3]	师苑, 王新华, 高红伟. 三级供应链企业间交叉持股时均衡定价及市场绩效研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(9): 145-151.
[4]	杨宏林, 窦甜丹, 高明运. 考虑RFID应用的资金约束供应链订购决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(8): 93-98.
[5]	曹兵兵, 尤天慧, 刘春怡, 吴雪艳. 基于货到付款支付模式且考虑银行存贷的二级供应链Stackelberg定价决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(7): 146-153.
[6]	宋兆宇, 孙秉珍, 赵可彤. 线性需求供应链中供应商参股制造商的定价与协调[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 166-171.
[7]	高华, 侯晓轩, 张新鑫. 基于风险偏好和公平偏好的PPP项目政府补偿机制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 191-197.
[8]	孙琦, 马骋, 柏庆国. 基于风险偏好的供应链企业社会责任投入与定价策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 47-53.
[9]	范定祥, 李重莲, 王晓蕾. 基于Stackelberg博弈的闭环供应链回收模式选择及其优化研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 135-141.
[10]	冯琳, 彭娅芝, 聂佳佳. 专利中介参与下的技术创新授权策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(3): 159-164.
[11]	狄卫民, 徐文君, 夏西强. 基于经销商再制造的闭环供应链政府补贴策略及效果分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(2): 102-109.
[12]	刘凯, 李春发, 李冬冬. 电商平台主导的E-闭环供应链定价、服务决策与回收模式[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 51-57.
[13]	刘丽, 张再生, 王哲. 基于双边匹配-动态博弈的碳减排技术投资决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(8): 20-26.
[14]	李春发, 楚明森, 周驰, 解雯倩. 条件免运费的B2C平台商最优凑单推荐服务水平策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(7): 115-122.
[15]	黄瑞芬, 孙俊凤, 王君. 碳限额与交易机制下受资金约束的供应链优化[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(6): 82-89.