基于GMCR的双渠道供应链价格冲突动态交互模型

doi:10.12005/orms.2017.0239

运筹与管理 ›› 2017, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (10): 94-100.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2017.0239

基于GMCR的双渠道供应链价格冲突动态交互模型

赵士南, 徐海燕

南京航空航天大学经济与管理学院,江苏南京 211106;

收稿日期:2016-03-19 出版日期:2017-10-25
作者简介:赵士南(1989-),男,山东临沂人,博士研究生,研究方向:冲突分析,供应链管理;徐海燕(1963-),女,江苏南京人,博士,教授,博士生导师,研究方向:冲突分析、决策理论与方法。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71071076,71471087,61673209);江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目(KYZZ16_0145);南京航空航天大学博士学位论文创新与创优基金( BCXJ17-11);江苏高校哲学社会科学重点项目(2015ZDIXM039)

Dynamic Interaction Model of Price Conflict in Dual-channel Supply Chain Based on GMCR

ZHAO Shi-nan, XU Hai-yan

College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China;

Received:2016-03-19 Online:2017-10-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在冲突分析图模型中,稳定性分析的均衡结果和决策者偏好信息之间存在一个动态反复的交互过程。为此,本文提出了基于GMCR的冲突分析动态交互理论,在偏好信息和均衡结果之间引入决策者的风险认知系统,以动态模拟冲突中决策者的风险认知、偏好信息与均衡解之间的交互关系。然后,构建了基于GMCR的双渠道供应链价格冲突动态交互模型,从冲突分析动态交互视角解释了价格战背后制造商和零售商的博弈行为,并有效预测了风险规避情况下双渠道供应链价格冲突的均衡结果,为供应链管理者提供了一套系统有效的冲突分析工具。

关键词: 冲突分析图模型, 双渠道供应链, 动态交互

Abstract: There exists a dynamic and repeated interaction process between the equilibrium of stability analysis and the preference of decision makers within the framework of Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. Therefore, the dynamic and interactive conflict analysis method is proposed in this paper by designing the risk perception system of decision makers between preference information and equilibrium, which can dynamically simulate the interaction relationship between risk perception, preference information and equilibrium of a conflict. Furthermore, the dynamic interaction model of price conflict in dual-channel supply chain based on GMCR is developed to effectively explain the potential behavior of a manufacturer and a retailer in the price game from the perspective of dynamic interaction of conflict analysis. Additionally, this model can accurately predict the equilibrium of the price conflict in dual-channel supply chain when the decision makers are risk-averse, which provides a systematic and efficient conflict analysis tool for the supply chain managers.

Key words: graph model for conflict analysis, dual-channel supply chain, dynamic interaction

中图分类号:

F274

赵士南, 徐海燕. 基于GMCR的双渠道供应链价格冲突动态交互模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(10): 94-100.

ZHAO Shi-nan, XU Hai-yan. Dynamic Interaction Model of Price Conflict in Dual-channel Supply Chain Based on GMCR[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2017, 26(10): 94-100.

参考文献

[1] 陈云,王浣尘,沈惠璋.互联网环境下双渠道零售商的定价策略研究[J].管理工程学报,2008,22(1):34-39.
[2] 赵金实,段永瑞,王世进,等.不同主导权位置情况下零售商双渠道策略的绩效对比研究[J].管理工程学报,2013,27(1):171-177.
[3] 徐广业,但斌,肖剑.基于改进收益共享契约的双渠道供应链协调研究[J].中国管理科学,2010,18(6):59- 64.
[4] 徐广业,但斌.电子商务环境下双渠道供应链协调的价格折扣模型[J].系统工程学报,2012,27(3):344-350.
[5] 陈军,赖信,何圆.基于市场细分的双渠道供应链决策模型[J].运筹与管理,2013,22(5):69-77.
[6] 丁正平,刘业政.存在搭便车时双渠道供应链的收益共享契约[J].系统工程学报,2013,28(3):370-376.
[7] 申成然,熊中楷,晏伟.网络比价行为下双渠道定价及协调策略研究[J].中国管理科学,2014,22(1):84-93.
[8] 张旭梅,陈国鹏.存在品牌差异的双渠道供应链合作广告协调模型[J].管理工程学报,2016,30(2):152-159.
[9] 陈国鹏,张旭梅,肖剑.在线渠道折扣促销下的双渠道供应链合作广告协调研究[J].管理工程学报,2016,30(4):203-209.
[10] 吴晓志,陈宏,解东川,等.多因素扰动下同价双渠道供应链协调应对突发事件[J].运筹与管理,2015,24(6):95-127.
[11] 赵礼强,徐家旺.基于电子市场的供应链双渠道冲突与协调的契约设计[J].中国管理科学,2014,22(5):61- 68.
[12] 许民利,聂晓哲,简惠云.不同风险偏好下双渠道供应链定价决策[J].控制与决策,2016,31(1):91-98.
[13] Kigour D M, Hipel K W, Fang L. The graph model for conflicts[J]. Automatica, 1987, 23(1): 41-55.
[14] Fang L, Hipel K W, Kilgour D M. A decision support system for interactive decision making: the graph model for conflict resolution[M]. New York: Wiley, 1993.
[15] Yu J, Kilgour D M, Hipel K W, et al. Power asymmetry in conflict resolution with application to a water pollution dispute in China[J]. Water Resources Research, 2015, 51(10): 8627- 8645.
[16] He S, Kilgour D M, Hipel K W. A general hierarchical graph model for conflict resolution with application to greenhouse gas emission disputes between USA and China[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 257(3): 919-932.
[17] Garcia A, Obeidi A, Hipel K W. Two methodological perspectives on the energy east pipeline conflict[J]. Energy Policy, 2016, 91: 397- 409.
[18] O’Brien N L, Hipel K W. A strategic analysis of the new brunswick, canada fracking controversy[J]. Energy Economics, 2016, 55: 69-78.
[19] He S, Hipel K W, Kilgour D M. A hierarchical approach to study supply chain conflicts between airbus and boeing[C]. Systems, Man and Cybernetics(SMC), 2014 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2014: 1559-1564.
[20] Fang L P, Hipel K W, Kigour D M, et al. A decision support system for interactive decision making—PartⅠ: model formulation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C-Applications and Reviews, 2003, 33(1): 42-55.
[21] Fang L P, Hipel K W, Kigour D M, et al. A decision support system for interactive decision making—PartⅡ: analysis and output interpretation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C-Applications and Reviews, 2003, 33(1): 56- 66.

基于GMCR的双渠道供应链价格冲突动态交互模型

Dynamic Interaction Model of Price Conflict in Dual-channel Supply Chain Based on GMCR

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	曹晓宁, 刘晓冰. 权力结构影响下考虑预售的双渠道供应链决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(9): 93-99.
[2]	郭金森, 杨萍, 周永务, 杨玉珍. 规模不经济下基于一致定价和促销努力的双渠道供应链协调策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(8): 99-107.
[3]	孙自来, 王旭坪, 阮俊虎, 樊文平. 不同权力结构对制造商双渠道供应链的影响研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(9): 106-114.
[4]	梁喜, 张余婷. 基于消费者偏好的低碳双渠道供应链定价与减排策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(12): 107-117.
[5]	李文立, 赵帅. 考虑溯源系统应用的优质农产品双渠道供应链决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(6): 98-108.
[6]	史思雨,孙静春. 基于不同融资方式的双渠道供应链定价决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(4): 1-8.
[7]	钱萍萍,严磊,李敏. 不同决策模式下的双渠道供应链合作广告博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(4): 42-47.
[8]	浦徐进, 刘燃, 金德龙. 考虑实体店公平关切的制造商线上渠道模式选择研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(11): 178-184.
[9]	石岿然, 蒋凤, 孙玉玲. 利他偏好对双渠道供应链成员企业的策略影响研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(9): 66-72.
[10]	韦才敏, 李忠萍, 范衠. 不同博弈框架下多竞争零售商的双渠道供应链定价决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(6): 63-74.
[11]	赵亮, 庄新田, 石军. 预付款融资下基于改进收益共享与回购联合契约的双渠道供应链协调研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(3): 159-167.
[12]	周熙登. 考虑品牌差异的双渠道供应链减排与低碳宣传策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(11): 93-99.