寻租偏好视角下的标准化参会企业专利策略博弈研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2022.0282

运筹与管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (9): 34-40.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2022.0282

寻租偏好视角下的标准化参会企业专利策略博弈研究

翟东升¹, 金苑苑^1,3, 黄怡², 何喜军¹, 徐硕¹, 胡涵清²

1.北京工业大学经济与管理学院,北京 100124;
2.北京信息科技大学经济管理学院,北京 100192;
3.北京信息职业技术学院人工智能学院,北京 100015

收稿日期:2020-07-21 出版日期:2022-09-25 发布日期:2022-10-21
通讯作者: 徐硕
作者简介:翟东升(1963-),男,山西运城人,教授,博士生导师,研究方向:技术情报分析;金苑苑(1983-),女,黑龙江牡丹江人,博士,研究方向:技术情报分析;黄怡(1996-),女,山西怀仁人,硕士研究生,研究方向:大数据分析与智能决策;何喜军(1979-),女,河北文安人,副研究员,博士生导师,研究方向:复杂网络与区域协同创新;胡涵清(1983-),男,湖北黄冈人,硕士生导师,研究方向:大数据分析与智能决策。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(72074014,2020.12-2023.12)

A Game Study of the Patent Strategy of Standardized Participating Enterprises from the Perspective of Rent-seeking Preference

ZHAI Dong-sheng¹, JIN Yuan-yuan^1,3, HUANG Yi², HE Xi-jun¹, XU Shuo¹, HU Han-qing²

1. School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China;
2. School of Economics and Management, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing 100192, China;
3. School of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing Information Technology College,Beijing100015, China

Received:2020-07-21 Online:2022-09-25 Published:2022-10-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 专利纳入标准使标准的公益性和专利的私利性之间的冲突愈发明显,部分企业在专利标准化过程中的为其低价值专利寻租行为必然会影响其他企业持续研发的积极性,不利于标准的构建和创新的发展。本文在寻租偏好视角下,运用专利组合理论构建了参与标准化企业专利行为博弈模型,并对企业专利行为的演化进行数值模拟,分析企业专利寻租行为的内在动机及寻租的影响因素。结果表明:领域专利组合强度足够大时,企业偏向于对标准必要专利寻租;针对排他性专利标准化竞争,企业能否寻租成功取决于竞争企业与本企业的专利组合强度的对比值;本研究结果以期为我国企业参与国际标准化专利决策提供支持。

关键词: 标准必要专利, 寻租偏好, 技术标准化, 博弈论

Abstract: Patent inclusion criteria make the conflict between the public welfare of criteria and the self-interest of patents more obvious. Some enterprises' rent-seeking behavior for their low-value patents in the process of patent standardization will inevitably affect the enthusiasm of other enterprises for continuous research and development, which is not conducive to the construction of standards and the development of innovation. Based on the perspective of rent-seeking preference, we us enterprise patent portfolio theory to build the patent behavior game model, analyze the enterprises intrinsic motivation in standardization with numerical simulation of the evolution of enterprise patent behavior, and to explore the influence factors of enterprise of standard essential patents rent-seeking. The results show that the enterprises that apply for timely patents have certain characteristics. When the intensity of the patent portfolio of participating enterprises is large enough, enterprises tend to seek rent for SEP patents. For the exclusive patent standardization competition, the success of patent rent-seeking depends on the ratio of the strength of the patent portfolio between the competitors and the enterprise itself. The results of this study are expected to provide support for Chinese enterprises to participate in international standardized patent decision-making.

Key words: standard essential patents, rent-seeking preference, technology standardization, game theory

中图分类号:

G306.0

翟东升, 金苑苑, 黄怡, 何喜军, 徐硕, 胡涵清. 寻租偏好视角下的标准化参会企业专利策略博弈研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(9): 34-40.

ZHAI Dong-sheng, JIN Yuan-yuan, HUANG Yi, HE Xi-jun, XU Shuo, HU Han-qing. A Game Study of the Patent Strategy of Standardized Participating Enterprises from the Perspective of Rent-seeking Preference[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2022, 31(9): 34-40.

参考文献

[1] 刘鑫,张栋,林晶晶.高铁潜在SEP的竞争预警分析及其政策启示——一个标准与专利关联分析的新框架[J].中国软科学,2020(08):36-46.
[2] 舒辉,刘芸.技术标准化问题的研究综述[J].科技管理研究,2015(13):151-157.
[3] 朱翔华.标准中纳入专利的现状分析及对策研究[J].中国标准化,2011(10):62-64.
[4] 崔维军,岑珊,陈光,等.SEP产生背景、运行机制与影响:文献回顾与研究展望[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2020,41(05):140-158.
[5] Pohlmann T, Neuhäusler P, Blind K. Standard essential patents to boost financial returns[J]. R & D Management, 2016, 46(S2): 612-630.
[6] 方文丽,方世建.专利政策视角下的序贯创新决策分析[J].运筹与管理,2020,29(9):101-105.
[7] Byeongwoo Kang R B. Just-in-time patents and the development of standards[J]. Research Policy, 2015, 44(10): 1948-1961.
[8] Key S. Don't file that patent yet file a provisional patent application first[EB/OL]. https://www.forbes.com/sites/stephenkey/2018/01/08/dont-file-that-patent-yet-file-a-provisional-patent-application-first/#4b5d537057fe,2018.
[9] 马天祺.专利布局[M].知识产权出版社,2016.151.
[10] 刘鑫,余翔.SEP与我国企业策略研究[J].知识产权,2014(11):59-63.
[11] 张米尔,国伟,纪勇.技术专利与技术标准相互作用的实证研究[J].科研管理,2013,34(04):68-73.
[12] Contreras J L. Essentiality and standards essential patents[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2017.
[13] Brachtendorf L, Gaessler F, Harhoff D. Truly standard-essential patents? a semantics-based analysis[J]. CEPR Discussion Papers, 2020.
[14] Pentherodakis C, Baron J, Thumm N. Licensing terms of standard essential patents; a comprehensive analysis of cases[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2017.
[15] 朱雪忠,李闯豪.论默示许可原则对SEP的规制[J].科技进步与对策,2016(23):98-104.
[16] Stasik E. Royalty rates and licensing strategies for essential patents on LTE(4G)telecommunication standards[J]. les Nouvelles, 2010. 115-116.
[17] Maskus K, Merrill S A, Affairs P G, et al. Patent challenges for standard-setting in the global economy: lessons from information and communications technology[M]. Cambridge University Press, 2013.
[18] Cotter T F. The comparative law and economics of standard-essential patents and FRAND royalties[J]. Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2014, 22(3): 311-363.
[19] Wittfoth S. Identification of probable standard essential patents(SEPs)based on semantic analysis of patent claims[J]. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology(PICMET), 2019. 1-9.
[20] Jeong S, Yoon B. Exploring an essential patent through a GTM-based standard map[J]. Engineering Management Journal, 2013, 25(1): 48-57.
[21] Jeong K, Noh H, Song Y, et al. Essential patent portfolios to monitor technology standardization strategies: case of LTE-atechnologies[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2017, 45: 18-36.
[22] 郑素丽,胡小伟,赵剑男,等.SEP申请行为新动向及其对我国的启示[J]. 标准科学,2017(06):6-12.
[23] Choi J P, Gerlach H. A theory of patent portfolios[J]. American Economic Journal Microeconomics, 2013, 9(1): 315-351.
[24] 张平.冲突与共赢:技术标准中的私权保护[M].北京大学出版社,2011.7-9.

寻租偏好视角下的标准化参会企业专利策略博弈研究

A Game Study of the Patent Strategy of Standardized Participating Enterprises from the Perspective of Rent-seeking Preference

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	魏杰, 舒伯灿, 卢静会. 基于电商平台的最优销售模式和退款保证策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(7): 213-219.
[2]	夏西强, 路梦圆, 徐春秋. 授权制造下碳交易对制造/再制造影响及协调机制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(5): 136-142.
[3]	尤天慧, 刘春怡, 曹兵兵. 考虑成员风险态度的零售商资金约束闭环供应链定价与回收决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 10-17.
[4]	姚佼, 唐庆云, 陈学敏, 郭晓峰, 熊杨辉. 基于DEA-博弈论模型的铁路电子车票实名制查验评价分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(3): 165-170.
[5]	刘国山, 刁海璨. 高科技企业与知识型员工劳资之间的薪酬博弈模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(10): 6-10.
[6]	侯剑, 白雪斌, 周艳明. 供应链金融借贷市场中均衡解的存在性研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(10): 102-106.
[7]	陈圻. 通用竞争战略研究方法论的历史反思——一个基于博弈与约束优化建模的新研究架构[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(1): 71-81.
[8]	张根明, 张曼宁. 基于演化博弈模型的产学研创新联盟稳定性分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(12): 67-73.
[9]	陈军. 考虑消费者选择行为的农产品质量分级博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(10): 68-75.
[10]	崔志伟, 高丽君, 曾庆超. 基于FDI收益分成视角的FTA网络演化[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(3): 1-6.
[11]	夏西强, 黄文心. 外包制造下政府补贴对低碳供应链影响分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(12): 73-80.
[12]	牟立峰, 王方媛. 基于电子商务平台的服务模式选择研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(7): 184-192.
[13]	韦才敏, 李忠萍, 范衠. 不同博弈框架下多竞争零售商的双渠道供应链定价决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(6): 63-74.
[14]	宋艳, 苏子逢, 孙典. 社会融合背景下新生代农民工利益抗争过程中的策略选择研究——基于博弈论的视角[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(5): 49-57.
[15]	魏光兴, 唐瑶. 考虑偏好异质特征的锦标竞赛激励结构与效果分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(9): 113-126.