运筹与管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 135-141.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2022.0364

• 理论分析与方法探讨 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑价格和服务联合决策的双渠道供应链BOPS模式选择

刘斌1, 顾琼琼2, 石苗青2   

  1. 1.上海理工大学 管理学院,上海 200093;
    2.上海海事大学 经济管理学院,上海 201306
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-14 出版日期:2022-11-25 发布日期:2022-12-14
  • 作者简介:刘斌(1971-),男,河南博爱人,教授、博导;研究方向:供应链管理;顾琼琼(1998-),女,河南周口人,博士研究生;研究方向:供应链管理;石苗青(1994-),女,河南安阳人,硕士研究生;研究方向:供应链管理。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(71971134)

Choice of BOPS Mode for Dual Channel Supply Chain Considering Joint Decision on Price and Service

LIU Bin1, GU Qiong-qiong2, SHI Miao-qing2   

  1. 1. BusinessSchool, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093,China;
    2. School of Economic and Management, Shanghai maritime university, Shanghai 201306, China
  • Received:2020-08-14 Online:2022-11-25 Published:2022-12-14

摘要: 本文对线上线下双渠道模式以及线上购买线下取货的BOPS模式进行了供应链定价和服务联合决策分析,同时考虑线下消费者的额外消费。研究发现:1) 在集中和分散结构中,除了单位补偿方案下,服务水平总是随额外消费的增加而提升,单位补偿额的增加会降低零售商提供服务的积极性。2)当消费者服务敏感度较大时,产品价格随着额外消费额增加;在集中结构下,BOPS模式下零售价格和服务水平比基准模式下高,在分散结构下,销量计入线下服务水平最高,单位补偿方案下次之,基准模式下最低,单位补偿方案下零售价格最高。3)当消费者服务敏感度较大时,企业宜采用BOPS模式,且在分散型结构中宜采用销量计入线下方案;当消费者服务敏感度较小时,企业不适宜采用BOPS销售模式。

关键词: 渠道融合, BOPS销售模式, 供应链管理, 服务

Abstract: This paper studies the pricing and service joint decision-making analysis of dual-channel model and the BOPS(Buy-online and pick-up-in-store)model in supply chain, while considering the additional consumption. It is found that: 1)In the centralized and decentralized structure, in addition to the unit-compensation strategy, the service level always increases with the additional consumption, the unit-compensation strategy will be affected by the unit compensation amount, and the service level will decrease with the additional consumption. 2)When the service sensitivity is greater, the price increases with the additional consumption, and under the centralized structure, the retail price and service level in the BOPS mode are higher than in the benchmark mode. Under the decentralized structure, the full-sales-transfer strategy is counted as the highest offline service level, and the unit-compensation strategy is next, the benchmark model is the lowest, and the retail price is the highest in the unit-compensation strategy. 3)When the consumer service sensitivity is high, the BOPS model should be adopted, and the full-sales-transfer strategy should be chosen in the decentralized structure; when the consumer service sensitivity is low, BOPS sale is not suitable for the enterprise.

Key words: channel integration, BOPS sales model, supply chain management, service

中图分类号: