价格与质量双重竞争下电商平台渠道模式决策研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2022.0358

运筹与管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 91-98.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2022.0358

价格与质量双重竞争下电商平台渠道模式决策研究

后锐, 程飞霞, 林晓刚

广东工业大学管理学院,广东广州 510520

收稿日期:2021-02-10 出版日期:2022-11-25 发布日期:2022-12-14
通讯作者: 林晓刚(1990-),男,广东人,博士,副教授,研究方向:供应链管理。
作者简介:后锐(1976-),男,教授,博士生导师,研究方向:供应链管理;程飞霞(1997-),女,硕士研究生,研究方向:供应链管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(72072041,72001048,71571052);广东省哲学社会规划青年项目(GD19YGL05)

Decision-making Analysis of Channel Mode of E-commerce Platform with Price and Quality Competition

HOU Rui, CHENG Fei-xia, LIN Xiao-gang

School of Management, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China

Received:2021-02-10 Online:2022-11-25 Published:2022-12-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 近年来传统电商正加速从经销商转变为连接消费者与供应商的在线市场中间商, 电商平台与供应商形成三种渠道结构:经销商模式、混合模式和在线市场模式。本文通过构建Stackelberg博弈模型讨论产品质量与价格双重竞争情境下电商平台与供应商销售合作模式最新选择问题。研究表明,当价格竞争强度适中而佣金比例较大时,混合模式是电商平台最优选择,此时产品质量差异最大;当价格竞争强度较小而佣金比例较大时,在线市场模式则是最优选择;在其他条件下,经销商模式是其最优选择。本文结论对电商平台与供应商合作模式选择、产品质量与定价决策具有参考价值。

关键词: 价格与质量竞争, 电商平台, 渠道模式, 供应链管理

Abstract: Recently, traditional online retailers are accelerating their transformation from retailers to online marketplace connecting consumers and suppliers. Platform and suppliers have formed three kinds of channel structures: reselling mode, hybrid mode and online marketplace mode. We develop a Stackelberg game model to investigate the optimal cooperation model selection between platform and suppliers under dual competition on product quality and price. We show that when the intensity of price competition is moderate and the agency commission ratio is large, the hybrid mode is the platform’s best choice, while the quality difference between two products is the biggest. When the intensity of price competition is small and the agency commission ratio is large, the marketplace mode is the platform’s best choice. In other conditions, the reselling model is the best choice. The conclusions of this paper have importantreference value for the choice of cooperation mode between platform and suppliers, as well as their product quality and pricing decision-making in practice.

Key words: price and quality competition, e-commerceplatform, channel mode, supply chain management

中图分类号:

F224.3

后锐, 程飞霞, 林晓刚. 价格与质量双重竞争下电商平台渠道模式决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(11): 91-98.

HOU Rui, CHENG Fei-xia, LIN Xiao-gang. Decision-making Analysis of Channel Mode of E-commerce Platform with Price and Quality Competition[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2022, 31(11): 91-98.

参考文献

[1] Tian L, Vakharia A J, Tan Y R, et al. Marketplace, reseller, or hybrid: strategic analysis of an emerging e-commerce model[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2018, 27(8): 1595-1610.
[2] 李佩,魏航.分销,平台还是混合?——零售商经营模式选择研究[J].管理科学学报,2018,21(09):50-75.
[3] 赵菊,刘龙,王艳,胡小建,李晓征.基于电商平台的供应商竞争和模式选择研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2019,39(08):2058-2069.
[4] 王滔,颜波.博弈视角下的在线渠道决策研究[J].管理科学学报,2017,20(06):64-77.
[5] Abhishek V, Jerath K, Zhang Z J, et al. Agency selling or reselling? channel structures in electronic retailing[J]. Management Science, 2016, 62(8): 2259-2280.
[6] 梁喜,蒋琼,郭瑾.不同双渠道结构下制造商的定价决策与渠道选择[J].中国管理科学,2018,26(07):97-107.
[7] 黄甫,宋华明,杨慧,马东升,吴佳伟.价格、质量与服务竞争情形下的二级供应链系统协调策略分析[J].中国管理科学,2018,26(08):106-117.
[8] 朱立龙,郭鹏菲,孙淑慧.三种混合分销渠道条件下供应链产品质量控制策略研究[J].中国管理科学,2017,25(03):111-120.
[9] 刘新民,赵梁,王垒,丁黎黎.考虑随机市场需求的双渠道供应链风险补偿策略研究——从质量与价格竞争视角[J].中国管理科学,2019,27(01):73-84.
[10] Xu X. Optimal price and product quality decisions in a distribution channel[J]. Management Science, 2009, 55(8): 1347-1352.
[11] Zhang J, Cao Q, He X, et al. Contract and product quality in platform selling[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 272(3): 928-944.
[12] Zennyo Y. Strategic contracting and hybrid use of agency and wholesale contracts in e-commerce platforms[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2020, 281(1): 231-239.
[13] Kwark Y, Chen J, Raghunathan S. Platform or wholesale? a strategic tool for online retailers to benefit from third-party information[J]. 2013. Forthcoming in MIS Quarterly.
[14] Yan Y, Zhao R, Liu Z. Strategic introduction of the marketplace channel under spillovers from online to offline sales[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, 267(1): 65-77.
[15] Tsay A A, Agrawal N. Channel dynamics under price and service competition[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2000, 2(4): 372-391.
[16] Chen J, Liang L, Yao DQ, Sun S. Price and quality decisions in dual-channel supply chains[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 259(3): 935-948.
[17] Lin X G, Zhou Y W, Hou R. Impact of a “buy-online-and-pickup-in-store” channel on price and quality decisions in a supply chain[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2021, 294(3): 922-935.
[18] Liu Bingbing, et al. “Manufacturer’s contract choice facing competing downstream online retail platforms”[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2021, 59(10): 3017-3041.

价格与质量双重竞争下电商平台渠道模式决策研究

Decision-making Analysis of Channel Mode of E-commerce Platform with Price and Quality Competition

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	扈衷权, 冯平平, 温浩宇, 田军, 冯耕中. 基于期望损失厌恶的供应链期权契约协调研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(7): 71-78.
[2]	魏杰, 舒伯灿, 卢静会. 基于电商平台的最优销售模式和退款保证策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(7): 213-219.
[3]	王辰宇, 孙静春. 基于电商平台的供应链广告决策和分销模式研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6): 61-66.
[4]	王雨亭, 陈克红, 王兰婷, 董克. 考虑退货的电商平台销售策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(4): 163-168.
[5]	侯剑, 白雪斌, 华连连. 考虑隐性股权的电商供应链融资模式研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(2): 178-183.
[6]	刘斌, 顾琼琼, 石苗青. 考虑价格和服务联合决策的双渠道供应链BOPS模式选择[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(11): 135-141.
[7]	曹开颖, 徐玉秋, 豆国威. 考虑网络外部性的生鲜企业渠道选择策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(11): 226-233.
[8]	孙林辉, 葛晨晨, 吴安波, 袁晓芳. 区块链技术影响下的供应链系统动态响应性研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(10): 53-60.
[9]	张琦, 刘洋, 樊治平, 李爽. 双渠道模式下制造商线上定制策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(1): 99-106.
[10]	田春英, 陈东彦, 陈兆波, 章定. 存在破产成本时保理授信下供应商赊销策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(1): 115-122.
[11]	孙琦, 马骋, 柏庆国. 基于风险偏好的供应链企业社会责任投入与定价策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 47-53.
[12]	浦徐进, 付文文, 沈琦玮. 竞争性供应商选择电商平台销售模式的互动机理研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(10): 107-112.
[13]	姜明, 李洪心, 刘德海. 基于电子商务B2B平台的个性化定制产品供应链治理结构重复博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(8): 45-51.
[14]	李美苓, 林健. 第三方电子商务平台与加盟商家联盟稳定性的演化博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(3): 1-9.
[15]	刘帅成, 王小芳. 家电企业和电商平台合作秩序的演化博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(10): 76-83.