外包策略下的三级供应链系统协调问题研究

运筹与管理 ›› 2011, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (2): 72-77.

外包策略下的三级供应链系统协调问题研究

朱珠^1,2,3, 朱云龙¹

1.中国科学院沈阳自动化研究所工业信息学重点实验室,辽宁沈阳 110016;
2.中国科学院研究生院,北京 100039;
3.辽宁大学信息学院,辽宁沈阳 110036

收稿日期:2009-10-31 出版日期:2011-04-25
作者简介:朱珠(1983-),女,贵州省赫章县人,博士,辽宁大学讲师,主要研究方向是物流供应链管理、计算机集成制造系统等;朱云龙(1967-),男,江苏南通人,研究员,博士生导师,研究方向为先进制造、信息集成和供应链管理等。
基金资助:
国家科技计划基金资助项目(2007AA04Z189);863国家高技术研究发展计划基金资助项目(2008AA04A105);辽宁省博士启动基金课题(90L3170301)

Research on Coordination Policy in a Three-echelon Supply Chain under Outsourcing Strategy

ZHU Zhu^1,2, ZHU Yun-long²

1. Key Laboratory of Industrial Informatics, Shenyang Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;
2. Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China;
3. School of Information,Liaoning University,Shen yang 110036,China

Received:2009-10-31 Online:2011-04-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 由于存在着激烈的商业竞争,供需匹配成为供应链追求高绩效的关键。本文在制造商采取产能外包的策略下,引入二次采购契约研究制造商和销售商之间的契约订货问题。研究表明:1)供应链上存在一个核心企业来主导供应链契约的制定;2)本文设计的二次采购契约机制对分散式供应链的协调是有效的;3)制造商通过产能外包解决由于销售商的二次采购造成的缺货,可以使其更好地满足销售商的产品需求,进而提高供应链整体收益。最后,通过算例对研究结果作进一步说明。

关键词: 供应链管理, 协调, 外包, 二次采购契约

Abstract: In today’s competitive business environment, matching supply with demand is essential in achieving an effective supply chain. This paper focuses on a dual purchase contract between the manufacturer and the retailer in a supply chain that manufacturer can outsource from the supplier when capacity is insufficient. The conclusion from this study suggests that.1)a core enterprise(i.e. the manufacturer)always leads the supply chain contracts;2)a dual purchase contract is effective in improving the whole chain’s efficiency; 3)coordinating with the supplier enhances the manufacturer’s capacity satisfying the retail’s demand and the joint expected profit of the chain. Numerical examples are presented to illustrate the conclusion in the end.

Key words: supply chain management, coordination, outsourcing, dual purchase contract

中图分类号:

C931.1

朱珠, 朱云龙. 外包策略下的三级供应链系统协调问题研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2011, 20(2): 72-77.

ZHU Zhu, ZHU Yun-long. Research on Coordination Policy in a Three-echelon Supply Chain under Outsourcing Strategy[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2011, 20(2): 72-77.

参考文献

[1] Cachon G, Lariviere M. Contracting to assure supply: how to share demand forecasts in a supply chain[J]. Management Science, 2001, 47(5): 629-646.
[2] Cachon G, Harker P. Competition and outsourcing with scale economies[J]. Management Science, 2002, 48(10): 1314-1333.
[3] van de Water H, van Peet H P. A decision support model based on the analytic hierarchy process for the make or buy decision in manufacturing[J]. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 2006, 12(5): 258-271.
[4] Chen F. Auctioning supply contracts[J]. Management Science, 2007, 53(10): 1562-1576.
[5] Tsay A, Nahmias S, Agrawal N. Modeling supply chain contracts: a review[M]. In: Tayur S, Ganeshan R eds. Quantita-tive Models for Supply Chain Management. Boston: Kluwer, 1999: 299-336.
[6] Cachon, G. Supply chain coordination with contracts[M]. In: Graves S, de Kok T eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management. The Netherlands, Amsterdam: Kluwer, 2003.
[7] 王迎军.顾客需求驱动的供应链契约问题综述[J].管理科学学报,2005,8(2):68-76.
[8] 高峻峻,王迎军, 郭亚军,吕芹.供应链管理模型的分类和研究进展[J].中国管理科学,2005,13(5):116-125.
[9] 杨德礼,郭琼,何勇,徐经意.供应链契约研究进展[J].管理学报,2006,3(l):117-125.
[10] Cachon G, Lariviere M. Supply chain coordination with revenue sharing contracts[J]. Management Science, 2005, 51(1): 30-44.
[11] Iyer A, Bergen M. Quick response in manufacturer-retailer channels[J]. Management Science, 1997, 43(4): 559-570.
[12] Taylor T. Sale timing in a supply chain: When to sell to the retailer[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operational Management, 2006, 8(1): 23-42.
[13] Fisher M, Raman A. Reducing the cost of demand uncertainty through accurate response to early sales[J]. Operation Research, 1996, 44(1): 87-99.
[14] ÖzerÖ, Uncu O, Wei W. Selling to the “newsvendor” with a forecast update: analysis of a dual purchase contract[J]. European Journal of Operation Research, 2007, 182(3): 1150-1176.

[1]	郭金森, 杨萍, 周永务, 杨玉珍. 规模不经济下基于一致定价和促销努力的双渠道供应链协调策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(8): 99-107.
[2]	曲晨蕊, 曾庆成, 陈超, 张倩. 基于收益共享机制的干支线衔接运输联合定价模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(8): 162-168.
[3]	李小燕, 李锋. 竞争环境下基于双重微分博弈的低碳供应链动态优化与协调[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(7): 89-94.
[4]	宋兆宇, 孙秉珍, 赵可彤. 线性需求供应链中供应商参股制造商的定价与协调[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 166-171.
[5]	王韶华, 刘晔, 张伟, 何美璇. 基于粗糙集与未确知模型的京津冀工业绿色发展的差异性与协调性分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(5): 200-207.
[6]	谭德庆, 陈雪甍. 资金约束下基于CVaR的供应链协调性研究与融资策略选择[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 40-46.
[7]	孙琦, 马骋, 柏庆国. 基于风险偏好的供应链企业社会责任投入与定价策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 47-53.
[8]	姚锋敏, 刘珊, 滕春贤. 两零售商竞争下第三方回收闭环供应链的决策及协调[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(3): 83-89.
[9]	张川, 陈宇潇. 政府补贴下考虑规模效应的动力电池梯次利用闭环供应链决策与协调[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 72-77.
[10]	王威昊, 胡劲松. 线上结合线下的供应链动态服务与定价决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 84-91.
[11]	李小燕, 王道平. 碳交易机制下考虑竞争和信息非对称的供应链协调研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 47-52.
[12]	潘林伟, 鲁皓. 分权竞争、协同意愿与城市群建设:考虑公平偏好的委托代理解释[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 226-231.
[13]	夏良杰, 柳慧, 黄迎, 李友东, 孙莹. 碳交易规制下的制造商减排外包模式选择:定制vs订购?[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(10): 199-205.
[14]	欧阳智, 苏秦. 企业关系视角下的知识流程外包策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(10): 220-226.
[15]	扈衷权, 田军, 沈奥, 冯耕中. 基于利润—CVaR的期权契约供应链协调[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(1): 13-22.