技术创新、溢出效应与最优环境政策组合

运筹与管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5): 237-242.

技术创新、溢出效应与最优环境政策组合

郁培丽, 石俊国, 窦姗姗, 孙广生

东北大学工商管理学院,辽宁沈阳 110819

收稿日期:2013-01-24 出版日期:2021-05-25
作者简介:郁培丽(1964-),女,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为战略管理、创新管理、产业组织理论;孙广生(1971-),男,副教授,研究方向为环境经济学、产业经济学。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71272163,71173034);教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目(12YJA630180,10YJC790222)

Technology Innovation, Spillover and Optimal Combination of Environmental Policies

YU Pei-li, SHI Jun-guo, DOU Shan-shan, SUN Guang-sheng

School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110004, China

Received:2013-01-24 Online:2021-05-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 构建环境政策内生的三阶段博弈模型,分析存在技术溢出效应时,环境政策组合工具对企业绿色技术创新的影响。研究发现,排污税和研发补贴有利于企业进行绿色技术创新,两者组合可以实现社会福利最大化。社会最优排污税税率低于排污对社会的边际破坏程度,并随着均衡产量的增加而提高。在技术溢出效应较高时,政府采取排污税和补贴的组合工具,而当技术溢出效应较低时,政府采取排污税和研发税的组合工具。当排污税税率外生给定时,竞争创新情况下的政府补贴要高于协同创新情况下的政府补贴。政府应结合行业技术溢出特征,采取相应的税收与补贴结合的政策工具,并在知识产权保护的基础上,促进企业集群协同绿色技术创新。

关键词: 技术创新, 环境政策, 溢出效应, 组合工具, 协同创新

Abstract: This paper analyzes the influence of policy instruments on firms' green technology innovation based on a three-stage game model. Results find that rate of emission tax and subsides on ER&D are conducive to firms' green technology innovation. Social optimal rate of corrective tax is lower than marginal social damage of pollution, and increases with equilibrium output. Government should use combination tools of emission tax and subsides when the spillover of green technology is very high while government should use combination tools of emission tax on polluting activities and research and development tax when spillover is low. When emission tax is exogenous, the subsidy in competition consition is higher than the subsidy in collabrative innovation condition. Government should use the combination tools to promote green technical innovation, especially the collabrate innovation, according to the industry spillover.

Key words: technology innovation, environmental policies, spillover, combination tools, collabrative innovation

中图分类号:

F205

郁培丽, 石俊国, 窦姗姗, 孙广生. 技术创新、溢出效应与最优环境政策组合[J]. 运筹与管理, 2014, 23(5): 237-242.

YU Pei-li, SHI Jun-guo, DOU Shan-shan, SUN Guang-sheng. Technology Innovation, Spillover and Optimal Combination of Environmental Policies[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2014, 23(5): 237-242.

参考文献

[1] 王国红,陈大鹏,刘颖.集群产业集成化过程的知识共享问题研究[J].运筹与管理,2011,20(3):162-167.
[2] Magat W A. Pollution control and technological advance: a dynamic model of the firm[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1978, 5(1): 1-25.
[3] Milliman S R, Prince R. Firm incentives to promote technological change in pollution control[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1989, 17(3): 247-265.
[4] 王敏,冯宗宪.排污税能够提高环境质量么[J].中国人口、资源与环境,2012,22(7):73-77.
[5] 宋之杰,孙其龙.减排视角下企业的最优研发与补贴[J].科研管理,2012,33(10):80- 89.
[6] Requate T, Unold W. Environmental policy incentives to adopt advanced abatement technology: will the true ranking please stand up[J]. European Economic Review, 2003, 47(1): 125-146.
[7] 许士春,龙如银.考虑环保产业发展下的环境政策工具优化选择[J].运筹与管理,2012,21(5):187-192.
[8] Nieto M, Quevedo P. Absorptive capacity, technological opportunity, knowledge spillovers, and innovation effect[J]. Technovation, 2005, 25: 1141-1157.
[9] 王文平,谈正达.产业集群中知识共享深度与知识型企业的创新资源投入关系研究[J].产业经济评论,2006,5(1):15-29.
[10] 叶建亮.知识溢出与企业集群[J].经济科学,2001,(3):23-30.
[11] 魏江,叶波.企业集群的创新集成:集群学习与挤压效应[J].中国软科学,2002,(12):38- 42.
[12] 梁涛,杨皎平,陆志宝.集群知识溢出对技术创新负效应的理论与实证[J].运筹与管理,2012,21(6):146-152.
[13] Oladunjoye O. Optimal environmental policies in a heterogeneous product market under research and development competition and cooperation[Z]. Working Paper, 2005.
[14] D'Aspremont C, Jacquemin A. Cooperative and non-cooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers[J]. American Economic Review, 1988, 78: 1133-1137.
[15] Ouchida Y, Goto D. A note on environmental R&D under time-consistent emission tax[J]. International Journal of Business and Economics, 2011, 11(3): 257-260.