社会互动视角下的服务型企业最优运营策略研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2021.0046

运筹与管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 91-96.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2021.0046

社会互动视角下的服务型企业最优运营策略研究

李城璋¹, 姜明辉²

1.深圳大学中国经济特区研究中心,广东深圳 518000;
2.哈尔滨工业大学经济与管理学院,黑龙江哈尔滨 150001

收稿日期:2018-01-19 出版日期:2021-02-25
作者简介:李城璋(1989-),男,黑龙江伊春人,博士,研究方向:服务运营管理;姜明辉(1967-),男,黑龙江牡丹江人,教授,博士,研究方向:商业银行风险管理,国际技术转移。

Optimal Operational Strategies for Service Enterprise under Social Interactions

LI Cheng-zhang¹, JIANG Ming-hui²

1. China Center for Special Economic Zone Research, Shenzhen University, Guangdong, Shenzhen 518000;
2. School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Heilongjiang, Harbin 150001

Received:2018-01-19 Online:2021-02-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文主要研究在社会互动的影响下,服务型企业如何制定以价格、服务速率为代表的运营管理策略,从而实现利润最大化。首先,基于M/M/1排队模型对顾客购买决策过程进行建模分析,考虑单个服务型企业在实现利润最大化的目标条件下,社会互动的作用如何影响定价和服务速率决策;其次,研究在竞争市场环境中,社会互动如何影响市场均衡状态下各企业的运营决策和市场份额。结果表明,无论在垄断还是竞争的市场环境中,社会互动对服务型企业的最优运营决策均有不同程度与方向的影响。

关键词: 社会互动, 服务型企业, 价格, 服务速率, 期望效用

Abstract: This paper mainly does a research of how to decide the optimal price and service rate in order to maximize a service enterprise's profit under social interactions. Purchase decisions of customers are analyzed first based on the M/M/1 model. The influence of social interactions on the optimal price and service rate strategies for a profit-maximizing-seeking service firm in a fixed market is then investigated. Furthermore, the effect of social interactions on enterprise's equilibrium operational decisions and market share in competition environment is explored. The research results in this work indicate that social interactions can always influence the optimal operational strategies in different direction and degree for a monopolist firm or in a competitive market.

Key words: social interactions, service enterprise, price, service rate, expected utility

中图分类号:

C934

李城璋, 姜明辉. 社会互动视角下的服务型企业最优运营策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(2): 91-96.

LI Cheng-zhang, JIANG Ming-hui. Optimal Operational Strategies for Service Enterprise under Social Interactions[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(2): 91-96.

参考文献

[1] 李涛.社会互动与投资选择[J].经济研究,2006b,8:45-57.
[2] 何兴强,李涛.社会互动、社会资本和商业保险购买[J].金融研究,2009,2:116-132.
[3] 李心丹,肖斌卿,俞红海,宋建华.家庭金融研究综述[J].管理科学学报,2011,4:74-85.
[4] Bearden W O, Etzel M J. Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1982, 9(2): 183-194.
[5] Cai H, Chen Y, Fang H. Observational learning: evidence from a randomized natual field experiment[J]. American Economic Review, 2009, 99(3): 864-882.
[6] Godes D. Product policy in markets with word-of-mouth communication[J]. Management Science, 2016, 63(1): 267-278.
[7] Papanastasiou Y, Savva N. Dynamic pricing in the presence of social learning and strategic consumers[J]. Management Science, 2016, 63(4): 919-939.
[8] Kostami V, Kostamis D, Ziya S. Pricing and capacity allocation for shared services[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2017, 19(2): 230-245.
[9] Bell C E, Stidham S. Individual versus social optimization in the allocation of customers to alternative[J]. Management Science, 1983, 29(7): 831-839.
[10] Cachon G P, Zhang F. Obtaining fast service in a queueing system via performance-based allocation of demand[J]. Management Science, 2007, 53(30): 408-420.
[11] Chen H, Wan Y. Price competition of make-to-order firms[J]. IIE Transactions, 2003, 35: 817-832.
[12] Chen H, Wan Y. Capacity competition of make-to-order firms[J]. Operations Research Letters, 2005, 33: 187-194.
[13] Li C, Jiang M, Yuan X. Managing price and service rate in customer-intensive services under social interactions[J]. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 2019. 20(5): 878-896.
[14] 李城璋.社会互动影响下的服务系统运营决策研究[D].哈尔滨,哈尔滨工业大学,2019.
[15] Yuan X, Brian H. Managing a service system under the influence of social interactions. Working paper. Singapore University of Social Sciences, 2019.
[16] Yuan X. Capability, competition and social interactions[D]. Doctor of Philosophy, National University of Singapore, 2013.
[17] Brock W A, Durlauf S N. Discrete choice with social interactions[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 2001, 68(2): 235-260.
[18] Anand K S, Pac M F, Veeraraghavan S. Quality-speed conundrum: trade-offs in customer-intensive services[J]. Management Science, 2011, 57(1): 40-56.

社会互动视角下的服务型企业最优运营策略研究

Optimal Operational Strategies for Service Enterprise under Social Interactions

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘浪, 黄冬宏, 逄金辉. 多因素干扰下的供应链最优定价与订货决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(9): 113-121.
[2]	简冠群, 李秉祥. 业绩补偿承诺对定增并购双价格偏离的影响机理[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(8): 205-210.
[3]	张艳琳, 窦祥胜. 考虑消费者忠诚的雇员激励契约设计[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 234-239.
[4]	杨兴雨, 林虹, 何锦安, 张永. 基于排序预测的带交易费用在线投资组合策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(2): 168-175.
[5]	范小军, 刘艳. 网络平台零售商自主销售对平台定价策略的影响[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 144-149.
[6]	喻均林, 何瑞铧. 管理层业绩预告会影响定增价格吗？——基于中介效应的视角[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 204-211.
[7]	徐梦, 李凯. 考虑海外代购的品牌商定价模型研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(8): 148-157.
[8]	原逸超, 石岿然. 考虑策略型消费者和退货的零售商降价促销决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(7): 58-63.
[9]	张琴义, 刘咏梅, 李学兰. 考虑制造商开设展厅的横向竞争博弈及定价-服务策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(5): 171-180.
[10]	张翠华, 许占峰. App开发者质量投资和定价策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(4): 54-61.
[11]	胡海青, 陈迪, 张丹, 张琅. 基于Copula的供应链金融质物组合价格风险测度研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(3): 77-90.
[12]	向健凯, 王春峰, 李洋, 房振明. 中国新三板市场阶段性集合竞价制度的价格发现研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(2): 195-204.
[13]	王文杰, 陈颖, 蒋帅杰. 考虑平台竞争的众包物流社会配送服务最优定价策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(10): 11-20.
[14]	朱万山, 毛启静, 陈珍珍. 减少弃风的集团内部风、火交易激励机制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(1): 106-115.
[15]	张伟平, 庄新田, 吴冬梅. 我国股市网络稳定性及其宏观影响因素——基于三种网络拓扑结构、鲁棒性的实证研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(1): 185-194.