基于电商平台的最优销售模式和退款保证策略研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2022.0239

运筹与管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 213-219.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2022.0239

基于电商平台的最优销售模式和退款保证策略研究

魏杰, 舒伯灿, 卢静会

河北工业大学经济管理学院,天津 300401

收稿日期:2020-06-26 发布日期:2022-08-17
通讯作者: 舒伯灿(1994-),男,贵州盘州人,硕士研究生,研究方向:物流与供应链管理。
作者简介:魏杰(1975-),男,山东泰安人,博士,教授,研究方向:物流与供应链管理;卢静会(1992-),女,河南濮阳人,博士研究生。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71971076);河北省自然科学基金资助项目(G2019202344)

The Optimal Selling Format and Money-back Guarantee Strategy Basedon Online Platform

WEI Jie, SHU Bo-can, LU Jing-hui

School of Economics and Management, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China

Received:2020-06-26 Published:2022-08-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于一个制造商和一个平台商组成的供应链,考虑消费者退货行为,运用博弈论建立了不同销售模式和退款保证策略下的六个模型。通过均衡解对比和数值算例分析,给出了制造商的最优销售模式选择和制造商与平台商的退款保证策略。研究发现:制造商同时选择转售和代理模式对其自身、平台商和消费者都最有利;在制造商同时选择两种销售模式的情况下,当转售和代理模式下客户满意度都比较高时,佣金费率对制造商和平台商的退款保证策略选择没有影响,制造商始终倾向于提供退款保证而平台商始终倾向于不提供退款保证。

关键词: 电商平台, 销售模式, 退款保证, 客户满意度, 博弈论

Abstract: In a supply chain with a manufacturer and an e-tailer, we use game theory to develop six models under different selling formats and money-back guarantee strategies by considering the consumer’s return behavior. Through comparing equilibrium solutions and conducting numericalexamples, we obtaintheoptimal selling format of the manufacturerandmoney-back guarantee strategies of both the manufacturer and the e-tailer. The results show that choosing both the reselling and agency selling formats is the most beneficial to the manufacturer, the e-tailer and consumers. Additionally, when the manufacturer chooses both the reselling and agency selling formats, the commission rate has no effect on the manufacturer’s and the e-tailer’smoney-back guarantee strategiesif customer satisfaction is relatively high under both reselling and agency selling formats. The manufacturer always tends to provide a money-back guarantee, while the e-tailer always prefers not to provide a money-back guarantee.

Key words: online platform, selling format, money-back guarantee, customer satisfaction, game theory

中图分类号:

F274

魏杰, 舒伯灿, 卢静会. 基于电商平台的最优销售模式和退款保证策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(7): 213-219.

WEI Jie, SHU Bo-can, LU Jing-hui. The Optimal Selling Format and Money-back Guarantee Strategy Basedon Online Platform[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2022, 31(7): 213-219.

参考文献

[1] Abhishek V, Jerath K, Zhang Z J. Agency selling or reselling? Channel structures in electronic retailing. Management Science, 2016, 62(8): 2259-2280.
[2] Chen B, Chen J. When to introduce an online channel, and offer money back guarantees and personalized pricing. European Journal of Operational Research,2017, 257(2): 614-624.
[3] Assarzadegan P, Rasti-Barzoki M. A game theoretic approach for pricing under a return policy and a money back guarantee in a closed loop supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 2020, 222: 107486.
[4] 罗美玲, 李刚.多渠道供应链中的跨渠道退货服务策略研究.运筹与管理,2019,28(2):20-26.
[5] Shen Y, Willems S P, Dai Y. Channel selection and contracting in the presence of a retail platform. Production and Operations Management, 2019, 28(5): 1173-1185.
[6] Tan Y R, Carrillo J E. Strategic analysis of the agency model for digital goods. Production and Operations Management, 2017, 26(4): 724-741.
[7] Yan Y, Zhao R, Liu Z. Strategic introduction of the marketplace channel under spillovers from online to offline sales. European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, 267(1): 65-77.
[8] Tian L, Vakharia A J, Tan Y, Xu Y. Marketplace, reseller, or hybrid: strategic analysis of an emerging e-commerce model. Production and Operations Management, 2018, 27(8): 1595-1610.
[9] Wei J, Lu J, Zhao J. Interactions of competing manufacturers’ leader-follower relationship and sales format on online platforms. European Journal of Operational Research, 2020, 280(2): 508-522.
[10] 孙书省, 浦徐进,韩广华.考虑线下权力结构的制造商线上销售模式选择研究.中国管理科学,2019,27(5):119-129.
[11] 王文宾, 丁军飞.基于电商平台的混合销售渠道对供应链决策的影响研究.运筹与管理,2019,28(6):89-97.
[12] Xu L, Li Y, Govindan K, Yue X. Return policy and supply chain coordination with network-externality effect. International Journal of Production Research, 2018, 56(10): 3714-3732.
[13] McWilliams B. Money-back guarantees: helping the low-quality retailer. Management Science, 2012, 58(8): 1521-1524.
[14] 黄宗盛, 聂佳佳,赵映雪.基于消费者满意的双渠道销售商退款保证策略研究.中国管理科学,2016,24(2):61-68.
[15] Yang H, Chen J, Chen X, Chen B. The impact of customer returns in a supply chain with a common retailer. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 256(1): 139-150.
[16] Li W, Chen J, Liang G. Money-back guarantee and personalized pricing in a Stackelberg manufacturer’s dual-channel supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 2018, 197: 84-98.
[17] 金亮.退款保证下线上零售商定价与O2O渠道策略.系统工程学报,2019,34(2):84-95.
[18] Wang L, Song Q, Zhao Z. The effect of money-back guarantee and customer value on dual-channel supply chain. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2019,28(5): 636-654.

基于电商平台的最优销售模式和退款保证策略研究

The Optimal Selling Format and Money-back Guarantee Strategy Basedon Online Platform

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	吴暖, 王诺, 吴迪, 汪玲. 考虑客户满意度的计划外来船靠泊调度模型及算法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(7): 22-27.
[2]	王辰宇, 孙静春. 基于电商平台的供应链广告决策和分销模式研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6): 61-66.
[3]	夏西强, 路梦圆, 徐春秋. 授权制造下碳交易对制造/再制造影响及协调机制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(5): 136-142.
[4]	王雨亭, 陈克红, 王兰婷, 董克. 考虑退货的电商平台销售策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(4): 163-168.
[5]	侯剑, 白雪斌, 华连连. 考虑隐性股权的电商供应链融资模式研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(2): 178-183.
[6]	邓友均, 穆云飞, 贾宏杰, 张永熙. 计及客户满意度的电动汽车物流配送路径规划与充放电管理[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(7): 136-145.
[7]	尤天慧, 刘春怡, 曹兵兵. 考虑成员风险态度的零售商资金约束闭环供应链定价与回收决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 10-17.
[8]	黄甫, 宋华明, 杨慧, 张哲, 吴佳伟, 吕一帆. 考虑消费者退货的双渠道订货量决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 33-39.
[9]	姚佼, 唐庆云, 陈学敏, 郭晓峰, 熊杨辉. 基于DEA-博弈论模型的铁路电子车票实名制查验评价分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(3): 165-170.
[10]	丁秋雷, 胡祥培, 位娟, 姜洋. 动态需求下蓄冷式多温共配多目标优化模型及算法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 13-19.
[11]	林强, 马嘉昕, 付文慧. 考虑农户“以次充好”行为的生鲜电商销售模式选择研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 232-238.
[12]	刘国山, 刁海璨. 高科技企业与知识型员工劳资之间的薪酬博弈模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(10): 6-10.
[13]	侯剑, 白雪斌, 周艳明. 供应链金融借贷市场中均衡解的存在性研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(10): 102-106.
[14]	浦徐进, 付文文, 沈琦玮. 竞争性供应商选择电商平台销售模式的互动机理研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(10): 107-112.
[15]	陈圻. 通用竞争战略研究方法论的历史反思——一个基于博弈与约束优化建模的新研究架构[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(1): 71-81.