Multi-attribute Decision Making Mode of Dynamic Alliance Partner Selection Based on Fuzzy

doi:10.12005/orms.2015.0117

Abstract

Abstract: According to the characteristics of fuzzy decision for partner selection process of open innovation and considering the different decision makers who have the credibility of different decision, this paper proposes a multiple attributes decision making model for dynamic alliance partner selection of open innovation. Firstly, a description of the multiple attributes decision making problem is given. Then, in accordance with the prominent characteristic of the method and considering the different decision makers to understand a problem with different weight, it improves TOPSIS. Finally, the validity and feasibility of the proposed method are explained by a numerical example.

Key words: innovation, dynamic alliance, partner selection, multi-attribute decision making

摘要： 针对开放式创新合作伙伴选择过程中决策者判断模糊性的特点,考虑到不同的决策者其决策可信性的不同,提出了开放式创新合作伙伴选择的模糊多属性群决策模型。首先描述了开放式创新合作伙伴选择的多属性群决策问题;然后依据该种方法比较突出的特点,考虑到决策者对评价指标权重的不同,对TOPSIS方法加以改进;最后,通过算例说明了该方法的有效性和可行性。

关键词: 创新, 动态联盟, 伙伴选择, 多属性决策

CLC Number:

F224

SUN Sheng-lan. Multi-attribute Decision Making Mode of Dynamic Alliance Partner Selection Based on Fuzzy[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2015, 24(4): 36-40.

孙圣兰. 基于模糊的创新动态联盟伙伴选择多属性决策模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(4): 36-40.

References

[1] 陈钰芬,陈劲.开放式创新:机理与模式[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.
[2] Gaballa A A. Minimum cost allocation of tenders[J]. Operational Research Quarterly, 1974, 25(3): 389-398.
[3] Kaslingam R, Lee C. Selection of vendors——a mixed integer programming opproach[J]. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 1996, 31(3): 47-50.
[4] Moore D L, Fearon H E. Computer-assisted Decision-making in purchaing[J]. Journal of Purchasing, 1973, 9(4): 5-25.
[5] Roodhooft F, Konings J. Vendor selection and evaluation: an activity based costing approach[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1996, 96: 97-102.
[6] Dean B, Schniederjans M. A multiple objective selection methodology for strategic industry selection analysis[J]. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, 1991, 38: 53-62.
[7] W. H. Ip, Min Huang, K. L. Yung et al. Genetic algorithm solution for a risk-based partner selection problem in a virtual enterprise[J]. Computer and Operations Research, 2003, 30: 213-231.
[8] Lyon T P. Competition and technological complexity in procurement: an empirical study of dual sourcing[R]. Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, 1999.
[9] Syam S, Shetty B. Coordinated replenishments from multiple suppliers with price discounts[J]. Naval Research Logistics, 1998, 45: 579-598.
[10] Babic Z, Plazibat N. Ranking of enterprises based on multicriteria analysis[J]. International Journal on Production Economics, 1998, 56: 29-35.
[11] Nydick R, Hill R. Using the AHP to structure the supplier selection procedure[J]. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 1992, 25(2): 31-37.
[12] Tam M, Rao Tummada V M. An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system[J]. Omega—the International Journal of Management Science, 2001, 29: 171-253.
[13] Mikhailov L.. Fuzzy analytical approach to partnership selection in formation of virtual enterprise[J]. Omega—the International Journal of Management Science, 2002, 30: 393-401.
[14] 钱碧波,潘晓弘,程耀东.敏捷虚拟企业合作伙伴选择的方法研究[J].中国机电工程,2000,11(4):397-401.
[15] Maloni M J, Benton W C. Supply chain partnerships: opportunities for operations research[J]. European Journal of Operation Research, 1997,101: 419-448.
[16] Zhan S, Poulin D. Partnership management within the virtual enterprise in a network[C]. IEMC, 1996: 645-650.
[17] Mary Johnson, Laura Meade, Jamie Rogers. Partner selection in the agile enviroment[C]. 4th Annual Agility Forum Conference, 1995: 496-505.
[18] Weber C A, Current J R, Benton W C. Vendor selection criteria and methods[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1991, 50: 2-18.
[19] 崔春生.基于TOPSIS思想的技术创新方案的Vague集评价方法及其应用[J].运筹与管理,2013,22(4):151-155.