云服务供应链技术创新与动态定价的微分博弈分析

doi:10.12005/orms.2020.0143

运筹与管理 ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 49-57.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2020.0143

云服务供应链技术创新与动态定价的微分博弈分析

鲁馨蔓¹, 李艳霞¹, 王君¹, 余思勤²

1.天津财经大学管理科学与工程学院,天津 300222;
2.湖南大学工商管理学院,湖南长沙 410082

收稿日期:2019-07-18 出版日期:2020-06-25
作者简介:鲁馨蔓(1986-),女,山东滕州人,讲师,博士后,硕士生导师,研究方向:物流与供应链管理、电子商务;李艳霞(1995-),女,天津人,硕士研究生,研究方向:IT服务外包与服务供应链管理;王君(1983-),男,天津人,副教授,博士,硕士生导师,研究方向:低碳供应链管理;余思勤(1997-),女,安徽蚌埠人,硕士研究生,研究方向:供应链管理。
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究项目(17YJC630097)

Differential Game Analysis of Technological Innovation and Dynamic Pricing in the Cloud Service Supply Chain

LU Xin-man¹, LI Yan-xia¹, WANG Jun¹, YU Si-qin²

1. School of Management Science and Engineering, Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, Tianjin 300222, China;
2. Business School, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China

Received:2019-07-18 Online:2020-06-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 考虑了时间因素对产品技术先进度的影响,引入微分博弈的方法在动态框架下研究云服务产品动态定价及技术创新问题。分别探讨了两种合作研发模式(创新成本分担契约和收益共享契约)下的微分博弈模型及均衡结果。结果表明,技术先进度敏感系数的增加会提高技术创新投入、云产品价格以及云服务供应链各成员利润;对于整个云服务供应链来说,选择低创新成本分担比例或高收益共享比例更加有利;当云服务供应链内部成员意见不一致时,可使用一次性转让合同来协调两方的行为。最后通过数值算例展示了模型的有效性。

关键词: 云服务供应链, 技术创新, 微分博弈, 一次性转让合同

Abstract: Considering the influence of time factor on the product technology advanced degree, this paper introduces differential game to analyze dynamic pricing and technical innovation of cloud service products in the dynamic framework. Two kinds of cooperative research and development mode (linked respectively to innovation cost-sharing contract and revenue-sharing contract) are discussed separately. The results show that technology innovation investment, cloud product prices and profits of cloud service supply chain members will increase with the sensitivity coefficient of technology advanced degree. For the entire cloud service supply chain, choosing lower innovation cost sharing proportion and higher revenue-sharing proportion are more favorable. In addition, lump sum transfer contract can be used to coordinate the behavior of the cloud service supply chain members when inconsistencies occur. Finally, the numerical examples show the validity of the model.

Key words: cloud service supply chain, technology innovation, differential game, lump sum transfer contract

中图分类号:

F272

鲁馨蔓, 李艳霞, 王君, 余思勤. 云服务供应链技术创新与动态定价的微分博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(6): 49-57.

LU Xin-man, LI Yan-xia, WANG Jun, YU Si-qin. Differential Game Analysis of Technological Innovation and Dynamic Pricing in the Cloud Service Supply Chain[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(6): 49-57.

参考文献

[1] 中国信息通信研究院.云计算发展白皮书(2019年)[R].北京:2019可信云大会,2019.
[2] Dhar S. From outsourcing to cloud computing: evolution of IT services[J]. Management Research Review, 2012, 35(8): 664-675.
[3] Dorsch C, Hckel B. Combining models of capacity supply to handle volatitle demand: the economic impact of surplus capacity in cloud service environments[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2014, 58: 3-14.
[4] 余江,万劲波,张越.推动中国云计算技术与产业创新发展的战略思考[J].中国科学院院刊,2015,30(2):181-186.
[5] Yan J Y, Lu X M. Research on cooperative innovation in SaaS service supply chain[J]. Advances in Information Sciences & Service Sciences, 2013, 5(8): 213-221.
[6] 鲁馨蔓,王君,姚松,李艳霞.基于竞合博弈的云服务供应链合作与技术创新决策[J].软科学,2018,32(11):39-43,64.
[7] 梁昌勇,叶春森.基于努力和赔偿成本分摊机制的云服务供应链协调[J].中国管理科学,2015,23(5):82-88.
[8] 李新明,廖貅武,刘洋.基于SaaS模式的服务供应链协调研究[J].中国管理科学,2013,21(2):98-106.
[9] 李新明,廖貅武,刘莹.服务性价比视角下的SaaS服务供应链协调研究[J].系统工程,2017,35(11):80-84.
[10] 王玮,陈丽华.技术溢出效应下供应商与政府的研发补贴策略[J].科学学研究,2015,33(3):363-368,418.
[11] 范波,孟卫东,代建生.具有协同效应的合作研发利益分配模型[J].系统工程学报,2015,30(1):34-43.
[12] 张建军,赵晋,张艳霞.基于连续时间动态博弈的供应链声誉及其微分对策研究[J].管理工程学报,2012,26(1):143-150.
[13] Cellini R, Lambertini L. Dynamic R&D with spillovers: competition vs cooperation[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 2009(33): 568-582.
[14] 马如飞,王嘉.动态研发竞争与合作:基于微分博弈的分析[J].科研管理,2011,32(5):36-42.
[15] 朱莹,朱怀念,方小林.基于随机微分博弈的低碳供应链协同技术创新[J].企业经济,2017(2):30-36.
[16] 王道平,王婷婷,张博卿.政府补贴下供应链合作减排的微分博弈[J].运筹与管理,2019,28(5):46-55,15.
[17] Berry R, Reisman M. Policy challenges of cross-border cloud computing[J]. Journal of International Commerce and Economics, Web Version, May, 2012: 1-38.
[18] Xing W, Wu Z, Dou W C. Pricing as a service: personalized pricing strategy in cloud computing[C]. 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, 1119-1124.
[19] Li H, Pu Y, Lu J. A cloud computing resource pricing strategy research-based on resource swarm algorithm[C]. International Conference on Computer Science and Service System, Nanjing, China, 2012: 2217-222.
[20] Saure D, Sheopuri A, Qu H M, Jamjoom H, Zeevi A. Time-of-use pricing policies for offering cloud computing as a service[C]. IEEE International Conference on Service and Operations and Logistics and Informatics(SOLI), 2010: 300-305.
[21] Genaro J G, He X L. Life-cycle coordination issues in launching an innovative durable product[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2011, 20(2): 268-279.
[22] Ouardighi F E, Jørgensen S, Pasin F. A dynamic game with monopolist manufacturer and price-competing duopolist retailer[J]. OR Spectrum, 2013, 35: 1059-1084.
[23] Giovanni P D. Environmental collaboration in a closed-loop supply chain with a reverse revenue sharing contract[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2014, 220: 135-157.
[24] Cachon G P, Lariviere M A. Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts: strengths and limitations[J]. Management Science, 2005, 51(1): 30-44.
[25] Giovanni P D, Roselli M. Overcoming the drawbacks of a revenue-sharing contract through a support program[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2012, 196(1): 201-222.
[26] He X L, Li T, Sethi S P. Dynamic pricing, procurement, and channel coordination with stochastic learning[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2015, 24 (6): 857-862.
[27] 朱桂菊,游达明.基于微分对策的绿色供应链生态研发策略与协调机制[J].运筹与管理,2017,26(6):62-69.
[28] 刘国伟.动态环境下的企业定价与投资策略[D].天津:天津大学,2017.
[29] Liu G W, Sethi S P, Zhang J X. Myopic vs. far-sighted behaviours in a revenue-sharing supply chain with reference quality effects[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2016, 54(5): 1-24.

云服务供应链技术创新与动态定价的微分博弈分析

Differential Game Analysis of Technological Innovation and Dynamic Pricing in the Cloud Service Supply Chain

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	徐琪, 吴翠, 陈啟. 共享平台下供应链闲置资源动态优化配置策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(9): 86-92.
[2]	李婉红, 李娜, 刘芳. 绿色技术创新利益相关者的三群体演化博弈及其仿真[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(9): 216-224.
[3]	李小燕, 李锋. 竞争环境下基于双重微分博弈的低碳供应链动态优化与协调[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(7): 89-94.
[4]	范德成, 谷晓梅. 高技术产业技术创新生态系统健康性评价及关键影响因素分析——基于改进熵值-DEMATEL-ISM组合方法的实证研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(7): 167-174.
[5]	马德青, 胡劲松. 考虑延迟现象的质量改进投入和营销努力动态协同策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 181-190.
[6]	王胜兰, 魏凤, 牟乾辉. 企业技术创新能力评价新方法的研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 198-204.
[7]	李保勇, 马德青, 戴更新, 胡劲松. 考虑参考质量效应的“农超对接”供应链动态质量改进策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(5): 52-59.
[8]	张芳, 蔡建峰. 基于政府支持的军民合作技术创新演化博弈研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(2): 8-15.
[9]	易永锡, 程粟粟, 傅春燕. 一个关于跨界污染控制的清洁技术创新微分博弈模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(2): 25-30.
[10]	王威昊, 胡劲松. 线上结合线下的供应链动态服务与定价决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 84-91.
[11]	樊自甫, 程姣姣. 基于微分博弈的数据开放策略及合作收益分配机制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 100-107.
[12]	陈恒, 杨志, 祁凯. 多方博弈情景下政产学研绿色技术创新联盟稳定性研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 108-114.
[13]	杨锋, 陈登辉, 焦传亚. 基于制造商技术创新水平的古诺与斯坦伯格博弈对比分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(10): 18-22.
[14]	马永红, 刘海礁, 柳清. 产业集群协同创新知识共享策略的微分博弈研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(9): 82-88.
[15]	徐春秋, 王芹鹏. 考虑政府参与方式的供应链低碳商誉微分博弈模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(8): 35-44.