毗邻沙漠地区微分博弈模型与宏观环境治理策略研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2022.0112

运筹与管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 49-54.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2022.0112

毗邻沙漠地区微分博弈模型与宏观环境治理策略研究

孙佳艺, 谭德庆

西南交通大学经济管理学院,四川成都 610031

收稿日期:2020-06-13 出版日期:2022-04-25 发布日期:2022-05-13
作者简介:孙佳艺(1993-),女,吉林四平人,博士研究生,研究方向:决策科学、环境治理;谭德庆(1966-),男,辽宁锦州人,教授,博士,博士生导师,研究方向:博弈理论及其应用,决策科学。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71571149)

Study on Differential Game Model and Macro-environmental Governance Strategy in Adjacent Desert Areas

SUN Jia-yi, TAN De-qing

School of Economics and Management, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China

Received:2020-06-13 Online:2022-04-25 Published:2022-05-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 工业化发展导致了脆弱的土地进一步沙漠化,沙漠地区政府应综合考虑经济发展与土地沙漠化导致的生态质量降低。通过构建两个沙漠化地区微分博弈模型,研究了两个地区的沙漠治理问题。研究结果表明,提高工业生产排放技术或沙漠治理技术均能够提高均衡经济产出水平,在工业生产收益系数较高的情况下也能够提高沙漠治理投入水平,并且两种技术提高存在交互效应;只有对生产排放技术水平和沙漠治理技术水平较高的地区,延长地方政府领导任期有利于沙漠治理;实现沙漠完全治理情况下控制土地再沙化的治理投入低于控制沙漠稳定在一定规模的治理投入。

关键词: 沙漠治理, 微分博弈, 计划期, 可持续发展

Abstract: The development of industrialization has led to the further desertification of fragile land, and governments in desertification areas should comprehensively consider economic development and the degradation of ecological quality caused by land desertification. This paper establishes a differential game model for two desertification areas to discuss the desert governance problems, the results show that improving industrial production emission technology or desert control technology can increase equilibrium economic output level, and they can also increase the investment level of desert control when the economic return coefficient is high, and there is an interactive effect between the two technologies; In areas with high level of production emission technology and desert control technology, extending the term of leadership of local governments leaders is more conducive to desertification control; The investment of controlling land re-desertification in the condition of completely combating desert is lower than that of controlling desert stable in a certain scale.

Key words: desert management, differential game, plan period, sustainable development

中图分类号:

X22
F224

孙佳艺, 谭德庆. 毗邻沙漠地区微分博弈模型与宏观环境治理策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(4): 49-54.

SUN Jia-yi, TAN De-qing. Study on Differential Game Model and Macro-environmental Governance Strategy in Adjacent Desert Areas[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2022, 31(4): 49-54.

参考文献

[1] Dockner E J, Long V N. International pollution control: cooperative versus noncooperative strategies[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1993, 25(1): 13-29.
[2] Jørgensen S, Zaccour G. Time consistent side payments in a dynamic game of downstream pollution[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 2001, 25(12): 1973-1987.
[3] 胡震云.水污染治理的微分博弈及策略研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(5):93-101.
[4] 易永锡,李寿德,邓荣荣.排污权价格不确定性对厂商污染治理投资决策影响的实物期权分析[J].系统管理学报,2017,26(1):78-84.
[5] 刘升学,易永锡,李寿德.排污权交易条件下的跨界污染控制微分博弈分析[J].系统管理学报,2017,26(2):319-325.
[6] 李寿德,黄采金,魏伟,樊琨.排污权交易条件下寡头垄断厂商污染治理R&D投资与产品策略[J].系统管理学报,2013,22(4):586-591.
[7] Jiang K, You D, Li Z, et al. A differential game approach to dynamic optimal control strategies for watershed pollution across regional boundaries under eco-compensation criterion[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 105: 229-241.
[8] Yi Y, Xu R, Zhang S. A differential game of R&D investment for pollution abatement in different market structures[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2019, 524: 587-600.
[9] Menezes F M, Pereira J. Emissions abatement R&D: dynamic competition in supply schedules[J]. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 2017, 19(4): 841-859.
[10] An H, Li Q, Yan X, et al. Desertification control on soil inorganic and organic carbon accumulation in the topsoil of desert grassland in Ningxia, northwest China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2019, 127: 348-355.
[11] Dong Z, Chen G, He X, et al. Controlling blown sand along the highway crossing the Taklimakan Desert[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2004, 57(3): 329-344.
[12] Jury M R. Climatic modulation of early summer dust emissions over West Africa[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2018, 152: 55-68.
[13] 姚洪兴,周飞.基于复杂网络的无线传感器网络在沙漠治理维护中的研究[J].计算机应用研究,2014,31(10):3033-3036.
[14] Zhang L, Jing Y, Chen G, et al. Improvement of physical and hydraulic properties of desert soil with amendment of different biochars[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2019, 19(7): 2984-2996.
[15] Wang Z, Wang Y. Carbon flux dynamics and its environmental controlling factors in a desert steppe[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(1): 49-54.
[16] Rajabi Agereh S, Kiani F, Khavazi K, et al. An environmentally friendly soil improvement technology for sand and dust storms control[J]. Environmental Health Engineering and Management, 2019, 6(1): 63-71.
[17] 王睿.库布齐沙漠可持续治理典型模式研究[J].西华师范大学学报(自然科学版),2019,40(1):92-97.
[18] 樊胜岳.生态建设政策对沙漠化影响的定量分析[J].中国沙漠,2014,34(3):893-900.
[19] 李江南.沙尘暴的危害与治理[J].生态经济,2017,33(7):6-9.
[20] 樊胜岳,杨根生.土地沙漠化过程的数学模型[J].中国沙漠,1989,9(1):93-100.
[21] 马衣拉·木沙江,阿布都热西提·阿布都外力.沙漠扩散预测模型的研究[J].新疆农业科学,2012,49(5):968-973.

毗邻沙漠地区微分博弈模型与宏观环境治理策略研究

Study on Differential Game Model and Macro-environmental Governance Strategy in Adjacent Desert Areas

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	徐琪, 吴翠, 陈啟. 共享平台下供应链闲置资源动态优化配置策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(9): 86-92.
[2]	李小燕, 李锋. 竞争环境下基于双重微分博弈的低碳供应链动态优化与协调[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(7): 89-94.
[3]	马德青, 胡劲松. 考虑延迟现象的质量改进投入和营销努力动态协同策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 181-190.
[4]	李保勇, 马德青, 戴更新, 胡劲松. 考虑参考质量效应的“农超对接”供应链动态质量改进策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(5): 52-59.
[5]	易永锡, 程粟粟, 傅春燕. 一个关于跨界污染控制的清洁技术创新微分博弈模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(2): 25-30.
[6]	王威昊, 胡劲松. 线上结合线下的供应链动态服务与定价决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 84-91.
[7]	樊自甫, 程姣姣. 基于微分博弈的数据开放策略及合作收益分配机制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12): 100-107.
[8]	马永红, 刘海礁, 柳清. 产业集群协同创新知识共享策略的微分博弈研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(9): 82-88.
[9]	徐春秋, 王芹鹏. 考虑政府参与方式的供应链低碳商誉微分博弈模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(8): 35-44.
[10]	鲁馨蔓, 李艳霞, 王君, 余思勤. 云服务供应链技术创新与动态定价的微分博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(6): 49-57.
[11]	关志民, 曲优, 赵莹. 考虑决策者失望规避的供应链协同绿色创新动态优化与协调研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(5): 96-107.
[12]	刘伟, 丁凯文. 考虑声誉效应的网络众包参与者行为博弈模型及仿真分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(5): 181-188.
[13]	王道平, 王婷婷. 政府奖惩下供应链合作减排与低碳宣传的动态优化[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(4): 113-120.
[14]	姜跃, 韩水华, 赵洋. 低碳经济下三级供应链动态减排的微分博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(12): 89-97.
[15]	王道平,王婷婷,张博卿. 政府补贴下供应链合作减排的微分博弈[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(5): 46-55.