运筹与管理 ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 45-52.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2023.0044

• 理论分析与方法探讨 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同权力结构下考虑制造商失望规避行为的低碳供应链决策研究

徐浩鑫1, 于天阳1, 关志民1, 曲优2   

  1. 1.东北大学 工商管理学院,辽宁 沈阳 110169;
    2.山东科技大学 经济与管理学院,山东 青岛 266590
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-14 出版日期:2023-02-25 发布日期:2023-03-28
  • 通讯作者: 关志民(1957-),男,辽宁开原人,教授,博士,研究方向:运营管理,物流与供应链管理等。
  • 作者简介:徐浩鑫(1983-),男,辽宁抚顺人,博士研究生,研究方向:供应链管理。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(70972100,71372186)

Research on Low-carbon Supply Chain Decisions Considering Manufacturers' Disappointment Aversion Behaviors under Different Power Structures

XU Haoxin1, YU Tianyang1, GUAN Zhimin1, QU You2   

  1. 1. School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169, China;
    2. College of Economic and Management,Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
  • Received:2021-01-14 Online:2023-02-25 Published:2023-03-28

摘要: 本文以一个具有失望规避行为的制造商与一个完全理性的零售商所构成的低碳供应链为研究对象,考虑了低碳技术创新投资的不确定性,分别在制造商主导(MS)、零售商主导(RS)及双方权力对等(Nash)三种渠道权力结构下,通过构建相应的博弈模型探讨低碳供应链最优减排水平与定价等相关决策问题。在此基础上,进一步对比分析了三种权力结构下的最优结果。研究表明:失望规避程度与单位低碳产品减排水平及制造商效用负相关;制造商主导时,其效用最大,但单位低碳产品减排水平最低,零售商主导和权力对等两种情形下的单位低碳产品减排水平(或制造商效用)存在关于减排成本系数及失望规避程度的阀值效应。此外,通过数值分析发现零售商期望利润在自身主导时最高,在双方权力对等时次之,在制造商主导时最低;而供应链总期望利润在制造商主导时最低,在其他两种情形下的大小关系同样存在关于减排成本系数及失望规避程度的阈值效应。

关键词: 失望规避, 权力结构, 供应链管理, 低碳减排, 技术创新有效性

Abstract: This article examines a low-carbon supply chain composed of a disappointment-averse manufacturer and a completely rational retailer. Considering the uncertainty of low-carbon technology innovation investment, this article constructs game models under three channel power structures-manufacturer-led(MS), retailer-led(RS), and the manufacturer and the retailer have equal power(Nash), and addresses decision-making issues such as the optimal emission reduction level and pricing of the low-carbon supply chain. We then analyze and compare the influence of the manufacturer's disappointment aversion coefficient on its optimal emission reduction level and utility under these three power structures. The results show that the manufacturer's disappointment aversion coefficient is negatively correlated with the manufacturer's emission reduction level and utility under all three conditions. When the manufacturer is the leader, the manufacturer has the greatest utility but the lowest emission reduction level. The relationship between the emission reduction level (or the manufacturer's utility) under cases of retailer-led and the manufacturer and the retailer have equal power as a threshold effect of the emission reduction cost coefficient and disappointment aversion level. In addition, through numerical analyses, we find that the retailer's expected profit is the highest when the retailer dominates, second when the powers of the two parties are equal, and the lowest when the manufacturer dominates. At the same time, the total expected profit of the entire supply chain is the lowest when the manufacturer dominates. In the other two power structures, there is also a threshold effect of the emission reduction cost coefficient and the disappointment aversion level.

Key words: disappointment aversion, power structure, supply chain management, low carbon emission reduction, effectiveness of technological innovation

中图分类号: