运筹与管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 65-71.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2025.0111

• 理论分析与方法探讨 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑回收再制造的共享产品定价及供应链内外交互机制研究

任雪杰1,2, 赵林度2   

  1. 1.南京邮电大学 管理学院,江苏 南京 210003;
    2.东南大学 经济管理学院,江苏 南京 211189
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-21 发布日期:2025-07-31
  • 通讯作者: 赵林度(1965-),男,山东烟台人,博士,教授,博士生导师,研究方向:供应链与物流管理。Email: ldzhao@seu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:任雪杰(1991-),女,山东济宁人,讲师,博士,研究方向:共享平台运营管理
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(72071039);南京邮电大学人文社会科学研究基金项目(NYY223004)

Pricing for Sharing Products and Interplaying inside and outside Supply Chain with Recycling and Remanufacturing

REN Xuejie1,2, ZHAO Lindu2   

  1. 1. School of Management,Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Nanjing 210003, China;
    2. School of Economics and Management, Southeast University,Nanjing 211189, China
  • Received:2023-05-21 Published:2025-07-31

摘要: 不同于传统销售模式下废旧产品始于消费者的回收, 共享产品归属共享平台, 回收再制造带来的是供应链内部共享平台和制造商之间的交互和博弈。同时,供应链外部即链际之间存在竞争交互。根据是否回收再制造划分三种供应链结构,构建成员Stackelberg主从博弈和供应链间Nash非合作博弈的模型,得到不同结构下的产品定价,进而挖掘供应链内交互和链间竞争机制。结果表明,两条供应链均回收再制造时顾客能以最低的租赁价格获得产品使用权,制造商和平台也会因为节约了成本而受益。市场结构会自发从均不回收再制造演化到均回收再制造。回收补贴通过影响批发价实现制造商和平台的利润协调,回收再制造节约的成本按照一定比例分配,竞争越激烈,平台占有比例越大;制造商可放弃部分节约成本以鼓励平台订购更多的再制造产品。分析参数弹性发现,二者收益主要受自身参数影响,竞争对手的影响较小。

关键词: 共享平台, 定价, 再制造, 链内交互, 链间竞争

Abstract: Sharing economy has become a hot topic in the field of management science, especially the operation and management of a sharing platform. The resources-sharing platform runs in a leasing mode, in which customers can obtain the usage right of products during a short time by paying a one-time fee if needed. However, waste sharing products have not been effectively dealt with. A typical case is the sharing bike, which not only occupies public space and land resources but also produces solid waste after reaching the three-year scrappage period. Practical and theoretical research show that recycling and remanufacturing can save costs. Consequently, they are widely incorporated into the product “whole life cycle management” process of bike-sharing enterprises.
Unlike the recycling of waste products from customers in the traditional sales mode, sharing products belong to the platform. Therefore, recycling and remanufacturing raise the question of how to reconcile costs and benefits between the manufacturer and platform inside the supply chain. On the one hand, the residual value of scrap products belongs to the platform, so the manufacturer should pay certain subsidies to the platform when recycling products. On the other hand, the manufacturer bears the cost of recycling and dismantling, which releases the environmental protection department of the government of the pressure. The platform should provide subsidies to the manufacturer to encourage recycling and remanufacturing. Comprehensively, the subsidy coordination between two members needs to be verified. Meanwhile, two supply chains consisting of two manufacturers and two platforms will compete with each other.
To investigate the interaction between members inside the supply chain, and figure out the competition between two supply chains, three structures are divided according to whether recycling and remanufacturing are performed. Under the premise of supply chain competition, the pricing of shared products in two supply chains with remanufacturing but without recycling, one with both recycling and remanufacturing, and one in only one supply chain with both recycling and remanufacturing are studied respectively. Both supply chains consist of a manufacturer and a sharing platform, to which the manufacturer sells new and remanufactured products, and the platform provides the use (rental) service for customers. By constructing the model of the intra-chain Stackelberg game and inter-chain Nash non-cooperative game, the optimal wholesale price and lease price are derived under different structures and thus the intra-chain coordination and inter-chain competition mechanism are investigated.
The results show that recycling and remanufacturing are a win-win strategy. Namely, they offer the lowest leased price, so manufacturers and platforms benefit from cost savings. As long as the subsidy given to the platform by the manufacturer does not exceed the positive threshold, the wholesale price will be the lowest when both members recycle and remanufacture, while it will be the highest when both members do not do so. The same conclusion holds for the optimal lease price without any preconditions. Moreover, the structures will spontaneously evolve from no-recycling to both-recycling. The recovery subsidy realizes the profit coordination between the manufacturer and the platform by affecting the wholesale price. Namely, when the subsidy is larger than zero, the unit subsidy given by the manufacturer to the platform will be recovered by raising the wholesale price; and when it is less than zero, unit subsidies given by the platform to manufacturers will be returned in the form of reduced wholesale prices. The saving cost is distributed according to a certain proportion. The fiercer the competition is, the more the platform occupies. And competition coefficient positively influences decision price and optimal return. Furthermore, manufacturers could relinquish part of cost savings to encourage platforms to order more remanufactured products. In addition, the analysis of parameter self-elasticity and competition elasticity shows that the revenue is mainly affected by its own parameters, and the influence of competition parameters is relatively slight.

Key words: sharing platform, pricing, remanufacturing, intra-chain interplay, inter-chains competition

中图分类号: