Research on Regional Differences and Influencing Factors of Technology Transfer Efficiency of Civil-military Integration Enterprises

doi:10.12005/orms.2020.0194

Abstract

Abstract: Under the guidance of the socialist ideological framework of Chinese characteristics in the new era of Xi Jinping, civil-military integration has been promoted as a national strategy. Technology transfer is an important carrier for multi-field, full factor and deep-level docking between civil and military. Technology transfer efficiency directly affects the implementation of the in-depth development strategy of civil-military integration. Based on the data of 45 civil-military integration enterprises in Chinese A-share stock market, from 2012 to 2016, this paper uses the DEA to analyze the regional differences in technology transfer efficiency of civil-military integration enterprises and conduct convergence studies by measuring technology transfer efficiency in different regions. The panel Tobit Model is used to analyze the impact of the six factors that have arisen from four aspects: corporate, government, universities, and the environment on the technology transfer efficiency of civil-military integration enterprises. The research results show that the technology transfer efficiency of civil-military integration enterprises in the past five years fluctuates greatly and interannual & provincial differences are significant. These factors include the scale of the civil-military integration enterprise, the differentiation of its products, the government's investment in science and technology, and the technical market turnover that have a positive effect on technology transfer efficiency. The number of universities and regional GDP have no significant effect on the technology transfer efficiency of civil-military integration enterprises. Finally, this paper provides some managerial implications.

Key words: civil-military integration, technology transfer efficiency, regional differences, influencing factors

摘要： 在习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想框架的指导下,军民融合已经上升为国家战略,技术转移作为军民两大板块多领域、全要素、深层次对接的重要载体,其转移效率直接影响到军民融合深度发展战略的实施。以2012~2016年间中国A股证券市场军民融合板块下45家企业的数据为基础,采用DEA的方法,通过测度不同区域技术转移效率,分析军民融合企业技术转移效率的区域差异并进行收敛性研究,进而通过面板 tobit模型分析以企业、政府、高校、环境四个方面产生的六个因素对军民融合企业技术转移效率的影响。研究结果表明:近五年军民融合企业技术转移效率波动较大,年际差异和省际差异都较为显著。军民融合企业自身规模、产品的差异化、政府的科技投入、技术市场成交额对技术转移效率有正向影响,高校数量、地区GDP对军民融合企业技术转移效率影响不显著。最后,提出相应的管理建议。

关键词: 军民融合, 技术转移效率, 区域差异, 影响因素

CLC Number:

F124.3

FANG Wei, ZHENG Li-ming. Research on Regional Differences and Influencing Factors of Technology Transfer Efficiency of Civil-military Integration Enterprises[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(8): 1-11.

方炜, 郑立明. 军民融合企业技术转移效率区域差异及影响因素研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(8): 1-11.

References

[1] 姜鲁鸣.军民融合发展缘何上升为国家战略[N].解放军报,2017-02-03(007).
[2] 姜鲁鸣.新时代中国军民融合发展战略论纲[J].改革,2018(3):24-34.
[3] 张炜,张近乐.谱写军民融合深度发展新篇章[N].人民日报,2018年02月08.
[4] 韩国元,孔令凯,武红玉等.基于SD的军民技术融合影响因素研究[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(24):116-124.
[5] 刘志迎,毕盛,谭敏.基于SD中国技术转移系统演化的动态模型研究[J].科学学研究,2014,32(12):1811-1819.
[6] 杜传忠,冯晶,张咪.中国三大经济圈技术转移绩效评价研究[J].财经问题研究,2017(07):95-101.
[7] 林德明,贾艳.基于DEA的“985工程”高校技术转移效率研究[J].现代教育管理,2016(12):23-28.
[8] 冯华,单丽曼.中国技术转移效率评价研究:基于Malmquist指数和Bootstrap-DEA的实证分析[J].学习与实践,2016(11):14-22.
[9] 吕荣杰,贾芸菲,张义明.我国省份技术转移效率评价——基于高校、企业比较的视角[J].科技管理研究,2018,38(12):86-91.
[10] 刘清海,史本山.技术转移效率及产权治理:基于不完全契约的视角[J].工业技术经济,2013,32(01):47-52.
[11] 余元春,顾新,陈一君.产学研技术转移“黑箱”解构及效率评价[J].科研管理,2017,38(04):28-37.
[12] 叶静怡,杨洋,韩佳伟等.中美高校技术转移效率比较:基于专利的视角[J].中国科技论坛,2015(01):150-155.
[13] 单丽曼,冯华.金融发展支持中国技术转移效率研究:基于金融功能观视角[J].现代经济探讨,2017(12):76-83.
[14] Anderson T R, Daim T U, Lavoie F F. Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer[J]. Technovation, 2007, 27(5): 306-318.
[15] Thursby J G, Kemp S. Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing[J]. Research Policy, 2004, 31(1): 109-124.
[16] Latorre M P, Hermoso R, Rubio M A. A novel network-based analysis to measure efficiency in science and technology parks: the ISA framework approach[J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2017, 42(6): 1255-1275.
[17] 尹岩青,宫宏光,李杏军等.装备建设领域军民两用技术转移促进机制研究[J].科学管理研究,2015,33(01):9-12.
[18] 邵妍.军民融合协同创新障碍因素及对策研究[J].科学管理研究,2018,36(03):9-12.
[19] 董晓辉,张伟超.军民两用技术产业集群协同创新动力研究[J].科学管理研究,2014,32 (01):1-5.
[20] 伍青.基于超效率DEA模型的上市军工企业经营效率分析[J].湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2007(04):102-105.
[21] 张旭,侯乃聪,李存金.军民融合的微观视角下国防科技工业企业技术效率研究:基于SFA方法的上市企业实证分析[J].经济体制改革,2013(03):96-100.
[22] 马喜芳,郭世贞,张天辉.基于BSC的区域军民融合绩效评估体系构建[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(20):113-120.
[23] 王柏杰,李爱文.军民融合企业效率测算及影响因素分析:来自我国“十大军工集团”上市公司的证据[J].科技管理研究,2016,36(23):67-73.
[24] 何玉梅,吴莎莎,杨锐.军民融合企业融资效率评价研究——来自四川军民融合上市企业的经验证据[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(04):146-152.
[25] Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6): 429-444.
[26] 谢文峰.高校技术转移模式的新趋势:公私合营探究[J].江西社会科学,2017,37(08):222-230.
[27] Chapple W, Siegel A, et al. Assessing the relative performance of U.K. university technology transfer offices: Parametric and non-parametric evidence[J]. Research Policy, 2005, 34(3): 369-384.
[28] Siegel D S, Waldman D, Link A. Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study[J]. Research Policy, 2003, (32): 27-48.
[29] Anderson T R, Daim T U, Lavoie F F. Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer[J]. Technovation,2007,27(5):306-318.
[30] Thursby J G, Kemp S. Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing[J]. Research Policy, 2002, 31(1): 109-124.
[31] Heher A D. Return on investment in innovation: implications for institutions and national agencies[J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2006, 31(4): 403-414.
[32] 徐凯,高山行.中国高等院校科研投入:产出研究[J].研究与发展管理,2008(02):97-101.
[33] 段宗志,曹泽.基于DEA的中国区域R&D效率测度及聚类分析[J].江淮论坛,2012(04):45-49+74.
[34] 原长弘,赵文红,周林海.政府支持、市场不确定性对校企知识转移效率的影响[J].科研管理,2012,33(10):106-113.
[35] Kim J,Anderson T, Daim T. Assessing university technology transfer: a measure of efficiency patterns[J]. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management,2008,5(4) : 495-526.
[36] 何荷,李祥辉,刘建伟.聚融合之力铸安全之盾:北部战区聚焦主战探索军民融合新模式[J].国防,2018(02):85-87.
[37] 李志俊,原鹏飞.去产能战略的影响评价及建议:基于动态CGE模型的研究[J].中国软科学,2018(01):10-18.
[38] 李子豪.腐败如何影响外商直接投资技术溢出[J].中国软科学,2017(01):161-174.
[39] Miller S M, Upadhyay M P. Total factor productivity and the convergence hypothesis[J]. Journal of Macroeconomics, 2002, 24(2): 267-286.
[40] 肖国华,杨云秀,王江琦.四螺旋参与度对技术转移及其效率的影响研究[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(04):7-11.
[41] 刘飞,王欣亮.新时代军民融合科技创新体系构建:基于三螺旋理论的视角[J].科学管理研究,2018,36(03):5-8.
[42] 李小丽.三螺旋模式下大学专利技术转移组织构建的理论框架分析[J].自然辩证法通讯,2016,38(01):116-124.
[43] 王耀德,艾志红.基于信号博弈的产学研协同创新的技术转移模型分析[J].科技管理研究, 2015,35(12):23-27.
[44] 彭峰,周银珍,李燕萍.中国高技术行业的技术转移与效率差异[J].求索,2016(03):92-96.
[45] 张春博,杨阳,丁堃等.中国大学专利技术转移模式分析与展望:以985工程高校为例[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(06):117-121.
[46] 范柏乃,余钧.高校技术转移效率区域差异及影响因素研究[J].科学学研究,2015,33(12):1805-1812.
[47] 王柏杰,李爱文.军民融合企业效率测算及影响因素分析:来自我国“十大军工集团”上市公司的证据[J].科技管理研究,2016,36(23):67-73.
[48] Jaffe A B. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firms' patents, profits, and market value[J]. American Economic Review, 1986, 76(5): 984-1001.
[49] 张文魁.企业规模、企业异质性与经济持续增长[J].新视野,2018(02):64-74.
[50] 双海军,谭建伟,刘乔乔.军民融合技术协同创新主体构成要素研究[J].现代管理科学,2013(02):85-87.
[51] Caves R E. International corporation: the industrial economics of foreign investment[J]. Economica, 1971, 38(1): 1-27
[52] 黄朝峰,高建平.军民融合发展理论与实践[M].经济管理出版社,2017.
[53] 郭富红,陈艳莹.产品差异化理论研究综述:基于产品差异化程度越高市场势力越大视角[J].现代管理科学,2016(09):97-99.
[54] 秦德智,秦超,赵德森.组织交互渠道、关系质量及学习意愿对中国-东盟跨国公司技术转移绩效的影响[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(02):53-58.
[55] Porter M E. The competitive advantage of nations. new york, the free press[J]. Competitive Intelligence Review, 1990, 1(1): 427.
[56] 陈叶婷,张晓涛.国际化、产品差异化对企业绩效的影响研究:基于我国上市制造业企业的证据[J].国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报),2015(04):134-142.
[57] 包健.地方财政科技支出对地方科技发展的影响分析[J].科学管理研究,2015,33(03):108-111.
[58] Cantwell J, Janne O. The role of multinational corporations and national states in the globalization of innovatory capacity: the european perspective[J]. Technology Analysis ＆ Strategic Management, 2000, 12(2): 243-262.
[59] 王方,李华.基于DEA的中国区域技术转移效率评价[J].科研管理,2013,34(S1):153-160.
[60] 宁继光,王筱雪.从技术合同成交量与交易额分析江苏技术市场发展[J].江苏科技信息,2009(03):6-8