运筹与管理 ›› 2017, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6): 132-139.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2017.0147

• 应用研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

分布自由时基于可控提前期的契约适应性研究

方新1, 2, 蹇明2, 靳留乾3   

  1. 1.重庆工商大学 商务策划学院,重庆 400067;
    2.西南交通大学交 通运输与物流学院,四川 成都 610031;
    3.重庆邮电大学 经济管理学院,重庆 400065
  • 收稿日期:2014-05-06 出版日期:2017-06-25
  • 作者简介:方新(1987-),男,安徽定远人,博士,讲师,研究方向:供应链与物流管理;蹇明(1973-),男,通讯作者,副教授,博士生导师,主要从事激励机制、物流系统优化、供应链管理等方面的科研与教学;靳留乾(1987-),女,河南郑州人,博士,讲师,研究方向:管理科学和工程。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(61305074,71602014);重庆市基础与前沿研究计划一般项目(cstc2013jcyjA0998);重庆市社会科学规划博士项目(2016BS032,2016BS082);重庆市特色农产品加工储运工程技术研究中心项目(KFJJ2016026)

Research on Contract Adaptability with Controllable Lead Timeand Distribution Free Approach

FANG Xin1,2, JIAN Ming2, JIN Liu-qian3   

  1. 1.School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, 610031, China;
    2.School of Business Planning, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing, 400067, China;
    3.School of Business and Management, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400067, China
  • Received:2014-05-06 Online:2017-06-25

摘要: 研究表明回购契约与收益共享契约具有等价性,然而二者却适用于不同的供应链。本文从提前期可控的视角并将供应链管理引入需求分布自由的市场环境,研究二者的适应性。首先构建一体化供应链系统的决策模型,基于模型推导其最优生产量和最优生产时点的存在性条件;然后分别以回购契约和收益共享契约作为激励机制,研究契约对单一供应商-零售商构成的二级分散供应链系统的适应性。结果表明,回购契约和收益共享契约均能协调供应链,但二者具有不同的适应性:当单位时间内边际生产成本增幅较大时,供应商偏好选择回购契约;提前压缩期越长,零售商越偏好选择收益共享契约。最后通过数值分析验证文章模型的有效性。

关键词: 分布自由, 提前期, 契约适应性, 回购契约, 收益共享契约

Abstract: In order to explain the phenomenon that the equivalence between the buy-back contract and revenue sharing contract does not agree with its adaptability in real life, in this paper, the adaptability of the contracts is studied under demand distribution free and controllable lead time. First of all, a model from the perspective of integrate supply chain is proposed, and then the existences of the optimum decisions including the optimum production quantity and the optimum amount of lead time from the integrate supply chain are proved. Second, the adaptabilities of the buy-back contract and revenue sharing contract under the decentralized supply chain are investigated, respectively. The analysis demonstrates that the contracts can coordinate the supply chain with demand distribution free and controllable lead time, but they have different adaptabilities. The supplier prefers to choose buy-back contract when the marginal cost of production changed is bigger, while the retailer prefers to choose revenue sharing when it has a longer lead time compression. Finally, a numerical analysis is given to demonstrate the validity and applicability of the model.

Key words: distribution free, lead time, contract adaptability, buy-back contract, revenue sharing contract

中图分类号: