考虑CO2排放的中国港口动态网络效率研究

doi:10.12005/orms.2022.0230

运筹与管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 152-160.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2022.0230

考虑CO₂排放的中国港口动态网络效率研究

薛凯丽^1,2, 贾鹏¹, 匡海波¹

1. 大连海事大学综合交通运输协同创新中心,辽宁大连 116026;
2. 大连海事大学交通运输工程学院,辽宁大连 116026

收稿日期:2019-12-06 发布日期:2022-08-17
通讯作者: 贾鹏(1979-),男,辽宁铁岭人,教授,博士,博士生导师,研究方向:港能经济管理。
作者简介:薛凯丽(1992-),女,山西万荣人,博士研究生,研究方向:交通运输规划与管理;匡海波(1965-),男,辽宁新民人,教授,博士,博士生导师,研究方向:港航经济管理。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划资助项目(2019YFB1600400);国家自然科学基金资助项目(71831002,72174035,71672016);辽宁省“兴辽英才计划”(XLYC2008030)

Study of Dynamic Network Efficiency of China Ports Considering CO₂ Emission

XUE Kai-li^1,2, JIA Peng¹, KUANG Hai-bo¹

1. Collaborative Innovation Center for Transport Studies, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China;
2. College of Transportation Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China

Received:2019-12-06 Published:2022-08-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 港口是一个多时期多流程组成的动态复杂网络系统。本文以2013~2016年中国10个主要沿海港口为研究对象,综合考虑经济、运营、环境等多种因素,将港口分为生产运营阶段和盈利转化阶段,并运用动态网络SBM模型进行港口效率评价,同时考虑了港口内部结构和跨期活动因素,通过结转指标将不同时期的港口结构连接成一个动态的整体系统,构建了动态的考虑港口相邻阶段间相互活动和相邻时期间跨期活动的非线性目标规划效率模型。不仅反映了港口效率在时间序列中的动态变化,而且揭示了港口内部的薄弱环节,完善了现有港口效率评价中忽略跨期活动和内部结构影响的不足。实证结果表明:中国港口的生产运营阶段效率普遍高于盈利转化阶段效率,动态网络综合效率低下与盈利转化阶段效率低有较大的关系,港口碳排放量仍然有很大的减排空间,动态网络SBM模型比动态SBM模型区分力更强,更适于港口效率评价。

关键词: 港口效率, 碳排放, 动态SBM模型, 动态网络SBM模型

Abstract: The existing studies regard the port as a simple system and only consider the operational efficiency or environmental efficiency of the port. However, the port is a dynamic complex network system composed of multiple periods and processes. Therefore, this paper uses the dynamic network SBM model to analyze the dynamic network efficiency of 10 major ports in China from 2013 to 2016. This paper divides the port into production-operation stage and profit-conversion stage by comprehensively considering economic, operational, environmental and other factors. The dynamic network SBM model considers both internal structure and undesired carry-over activities of the port. It not only reflects the dynamic changes of ports efficiency in the time series, but also reveals the weak links in the port. It improves the existing port efficiency evaluation to ignore the carry-over activities and the internal structure. Finally, the empirical results show that the efficiency of the production-operation stage is generally higher than the profit-conversion stage, the overall-efficiency of the port is closely related to the efficiency of the profit-conversion stage, and there is a large space for CO₂ emission reduction.

Key words: port efficiency, carbon emission, dynamic SBM model, dynamic network SBM model

中图分类号:

F224
F552

薛凯丽, 贾鹏, 匡海波. 考虑CO₂排放的中国港口动态网络效率研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(7): 152-160.

XUE Kai-li1,2, JIA Peng, KUANG Hai-bo. Study of Dynamic Network Efficiency of China Ports Considering CO₂ Emission[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2022, 31(7): 152-160.

参考文献

[1] Tone K, Tsutsui M. Dynamic DEA with network structure: a slacks-based measure approach. Omega, 2014, 42(1): 124-131.
[2] Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6): 429-444.
[3] 韩兵, 苏屹,李彤,万民.基于两阶段DEA的高技术企业技术创新绩效研究.科研管理,2018,39(3):11-19.
[4] 范德成, 李盛楠.区域高技术产业技术创新效率测度与提升路径研究——基于共享投入关联型两阶段DEA模型.运筹与管理,2019,28(5):156-165.
[5] 刘炳胜, 王敏,李灵,王然,孟俊娜.中国建筑产业链两阶段综合效率、纯技术效率、规模效率及其影响因素.运筹与管理,2019,28(2):174-183.
[6] 段永瑞, 景一方,李贵萍.基于两阶段DEA方法的中国商业银行效率评价.运筹与管理,2019,28(2):118-125.
[7] 易荣华, 邵洁浩.基于DEA的中国证券市场竞争力国际比较.中国管理科学,2019,27(1):11-21.
[8] 方炜, 郑立明.军民融合企业技术转移效率区域差异及影响因素研究.运筹与管理,2020,29(8):1-11.
[9] 匡海波.基于超效率CCR-DEA的中国港口上市公司成本效率评价研究.中国管理科学,2007,15(3):142-148.
[10] Güner S. Investigating infrastructure, superstructure, operating and financial efficiency in the management of turkish seaports using data envelopment analysis. Transport Policy, 2015, 40: 36-48.
[11] 鲁渤, 汪寿阳.中韩集装箱码头运营效率的比较研究.管理评论,2017,29(5):175-182.
[12] Wiegmans B, Witte P. Efficiency of inland waterway container terminals: stochastic frontier and data envelopment analysis to analyze the capacity design-and throughput efficiency. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2017, 106: 12-21.
[13] Fre R, Grosskopf S. Network DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2000, 34(1): 35-49.
[14] Bichou K. A two-stage supply chain DEA model for measuring container-terminal efficiency. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 2011, 3(1): 6-26.
[15] Wanke P F. Physical infrastructure and flight consolidation efficiency drivers in brazilian airports: a two-stage network-DEA approach. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2013, 31: 1-5.
[16] Low J M W, Lam S W, Tang L C, Lan Z. Evaluations of port performances from a seaborne cargo supply chain perspective. Polish Maritime Research, 2013, 20: 20-31.
[17] 赵楠, 真虹.基于Malmquist指数和属性论的港口资源整合效果后评价.交通运输系统工程与信息,2015,(3):214-221.
[18] Chang V, Tovar B. Metafrontier analysis on productivity for west coast of south pacific terminals. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2017, 103: 118-134.
[19] Gil-Ropero A, Turias I J, Cerban M. Efficiency evolution of largest Iberian peninsula container ports: an application of Malmquist productivity index. International Journal of Transport Economics, 2018, 45(1): 53-81.
[20] Chang Y T. Environmental efficiency of ports: a data envelopment analysis approach. Maritime Policy & Management, 2013, 40(5): 467-478.
[21] Na J H, Choi A Y, Ji J H, Zhang D L. Environmental efficiency analysis of Chinese container ports with CO₂ emissions: an inseparable input-output SBM model. Journal of Transport Geography, 2017, 65: 13-24.
[22] 刘勇, 汪传旭.基于非期望输出网络DEA的集装箱港口群效率评价.系统工程,2018,36(4):121-126.
[23] Park Y S, Ghani N M A M A, Gebremikael F, Egilmez G. Benchmarking environmental efficiency of ports using data mining and RDEA: the case of a U.S. container ports. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 2019, 22(2): 172-187.
[24] KMI. Port areas’ response to the climate change regime. Korea Maritime Institution, 2009.
[25] Tone K, Tsutsui M. Dynamic DEA: a slacks-based measure approach. Omega, 2010, 38(3-4): 145-156.

考虑CO₂排放的中国港口动态网络效率研究

Study of Dynamic Network Efficiency of China Ports Considering CO₂ Emission

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李根忠, 朱洪亮. 基于三阶段SM-DEA-Malmquist指数的长江经济带碳排放效率研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6): 161-167.
[2]	郑清, 阿布都热合曼·卡的尔. 碳税机制下考虑不同低碳策略的动态博弈模型及复杂性研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(4): 55-60.
[3]	鲍熊剑涛, 赵文会, 宋亚君, 王晓梅. 可再生能源配额制与碳排放权交易并行实施的政策效果[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(4): 129-135.
[4]	许杰, 陈富坚, 刘国平. 机动车碳税政策下政府、企业与出行者的三方演化博弈模型研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(9): 9-16.
[5]	田成诗, 刘怡. 中国碳排放与经济发展存在倒U型关系吗?——考虑时间相关效应和异质性的研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(9): 232-239.
[6]	梁喜, 张余婷. 基于消费者偏好的低碳双渠道供应链定价与减排策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(12): 107-117.
[7]	王新利, 黄元生, 刘诗剑. 优化能源消费结构对河北省碳强度目标实现的贡献潜力分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(12): 140-146.
[8]	刘金培, 宋晓霞, 陈华友, 汪官镇, 王珍. 中国人均碳排放影响因素的长期均衡与因果动态关系研究——基于结构突变ARDL-VECM模型的实证分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(9): 57-65.
[9]	潘燕春, 杨雯, 马建华, 马楠, 陈智民, 周明. C&T条件下碳排放核查三方博弈研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(9): 66-74.
[10]	薛星群, 王旭坪, 詹林敏. 电子商务物流最后一公里配送的碳排放研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(12): 118-123.
[11]	杨越, 成力为. 区域差异化制度设计下的碳排放交易市场效率评价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(5): 157-167.
[12]	曹细玉, 张杰芳. 碳减排补贴与碳税下的供应链碳减排决策优化与协调[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(4): 57-61.
[13]	王君. 考虑碳排放的多机可持续调度问题[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(8): 187-192.
[14]	柴建, 邢丽敏, 周友洪, 魏宝来, 汪寿阳. 交通运输结构调整对碳排放的影响效应研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(7): 110-116.
[15]	覃艳华, 曹细玉, 曹磊. 碳排放交易机制下的供应链运作策略及协调研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(3): 36-42.