食品供应链企业社会责任的演化博弈分析

doi:10.12005/orms.2017.0184

运筹与管理 ›› 2017, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (8): 34-44.DOI: 10.12005/orms.2017.0184

食品供应链企业社会责任的演化博弈分析

李美苓, 张强, 邹正兴

北京理工大学管理与经济学院,北京 100081

收稿日期:2016-04-25 出版日期:2017-08-25
作者简介:李美苓(1990-),女,河北沧州人,硕士研究生,管理科学与工程,研究方向:决策分析,物流与供应链管理,合作对策及其应用等;张强(1955-),男,教授,辽宁沈阳人,教授,博士,研究方向:物流与供应链管理,合作对策,模糊对策与决策等。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(NO. 71071018,71371030,71271029,71401003,71561022)和高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金博导类(NO. 20111101110036)资助课题

Evolutionary Game Analysis of Social Responsibility in the Food Supply Chain Enterprises

LI Mei-ling, ZHANG Qiang, ZOU Zheng-xing

School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

Received:2016-04-25 Online:2017-08-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 食品行业的互联网化进程中食品安全事件的频发使得互联网背景下食品供应链企业的社会责任问题引起国内外社会各界的广泛关注。在此背景下本文建立了食品供应商与第三方电子商务平台关于企业社会责任的博弈模型,根据实际情况做了相应的参数设置和变量假设并进行了演化结果分析,得到了食品供应商与第三方电子商务平台在不同情形下的演化稳定均衡策略,同时给出了参数变化时对演化稳定均衡策略的影响。本文的研究成果对食品供应链的社会责任研究具有一定的借鉴和参考价值。

关键词: 食品供应链, 社会责任, 演化博弈, 演化稳定均衡策略, 参数分析

Abstract: In the process of food industry developing with Internet, frequent incidents about food safety have aroused widespread concern on social responsibility in food supply chain at home and abroad. Under the above context, this paper established evolutionary game model on social responsibility between food manufactures and third-party e-commerce platform and set up some related parameters and variables hypothesis based on some actual conditions. We also analyzed the influence of parameter variation on evolutionary stable equilibrium strategy, expecting to bring certain reference value for the study of social responsibility in the food supply chain.

Key words: food supply chain, social responsibility, evolutionary game, evolutionary stable strategy, parameter analysis

中图分类号:

F224.32
O225

李美苓, 张强, 邹正兴. 食品供应链企业社会责任的演化博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(8): 34-44.

LI Mei-ling, ZHANG Qiang, ZOU Zheng-xing. Evolutionary Game Analysis of Social Responsibility in the Food Supply Chain Enterprises[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2017, 26(8): 34-44.

参考文献

[1] 刘端.会计政策的博弈论研究[M].西南财经大学出版社,2005.
[2] Smith Maynard J, Price G R. The logic of animal conflict[J]. Nature, 1973, 246: 15.
[3] Weibull J. Evolutionary game theory[M]. The MIT press, 1977.
[4] Yu H, Zeng A Z, Zhao L. Analyzing the evolutionary stability of the vendor-managed inventory supply chains[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2009, 56(1): 274-282.
[5] Xiao T, Chen G. Wholesale pricing and evolutionarily stable strategies of retailers with imperfectly observable objective[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 196(3): 1190-1201.
[6] 王永平,孟卫东.供应链企业合作竞争机制的演化博弈分析[J].管理工程学报,2004,18(2):96-98.
[7] Xiao T, Yu G. Supply chain disruption management and evolutionarily stable strategies of retailers in the quantity-setting duopoly situation with homogeneous goods[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 173(2): 648-668.
[8] 黄敏镁.基于演化博弈的供应链协同产品开发合作机制研究[J].中国管理科学,2010,18(6):155-162.
[9] Zhu Q, Dou Y. Evolutionary game model between governments and core enterprises in greening supply Chains[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2007, 27(12): 85-89.
[10] Tian Y, Govindan K, Zhu Q. A system dynamics model based on evolutionary game theory for green supply chain management diffusion among Chinese manufacturers[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 80: 96-105.
[11] Ji P, Ma X, Li G. Developing green purchasing relationships for the manufacturing industry: an evolutionary game theory perspective[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 166: 155-162.
[12] de Vlieger J J. From corporate social responsibility to chain social responsibility[J]. Quantifying the agri-food supply chain, 2006: 191-206.
[13] Spence L, Bourlakis M. The evolution from corporate social responsibility to supply chain responsibility: the case of Waitrose[J]. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 2009, 14(4): 291-302.
[14] Awaysheh A, Klassen R D. The impact of supply Chain structure on the use of supplier socially responsible practices[J]. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2010, 30(12): 1246-1268.
[15] 李弘,王耀球,刘洪松.基于企业社会责任的供应链利益相关者关系研究[J].物流技术,2011,30(9):163-167.
[16] 郭春香, 李旭升, 郭耀煌. 社会责任环境下供应链的协作与利润分享策略研究[J].管理工程学报,2011,25(2):103-108.
[17] Manning L. Corporate and consumer social responsibility in the food supply chain[J]. British Food Journal, 2013, 115(1): 9-29.
[18] Gold S, Heikkurinen P. Corporate responsibility, supply Chain management and strategy: in search of new perspectives for sustainable food production[J]. Journal of Global Responsibility, 2013, 4(2): 276-291.
[19] Jones P, Hillier D, Comfort D. Assurance of the leading UK food retailers' corporate social responsibility sustainability reports[J]. Corporate Governance, 2014, 14(1): 130-138.
[20] Hsueh C F. A bilevel programming model for corporate social responsibility collaboration in sustainable supply chain management[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2015, 73: 84-95.
[21] Ma X. Analysis on quality control in food supply chain based on dynamics evolutionary game model[C]. Optoelectronics and Image Processing (ICOIP), 2010 International Conference on. IEEE, 2010, 1: 259-262.
[22] 陈艳君,田双亮.基于复制动态的食品安全监管演化博弈分析[J].科技广场,2010,(6):191-194.
[23] 许民利,王俏,欧阳林寒.食品供应链中质量投入的演化博弈分析[J].中国管理科学,2012,20(5):131-141.
[24] Friedman D. Evolutionary games in economics[J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1991: 637-666.

食品供应链企业社会责任的演化博弈分析

Evolutionary Game Analysis of Social Responsibility in the Food Supply Chain Enterprises

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	许杰, 陈富坚, 刘国平. 机动车碳税政策下政府、企业与出行者的三方演化博弈模型研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(9): 9-16.
[2]	薛雷, 戴大双. 造船企业与供应商产品质量演化博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(9): 17-24.
[3]	温丹辉, 蒙司慧, 丁守宏. 非同质演化博弈及其在移动污染源监管中的应用[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(9): 158-163.
[4]	李婉红, 李娜, 刘芳. 绿色技术创新利益相关者的三群体演化博弈及其仿真[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(9): 216-224.
[5]	王先甲, 顾翠伶, 赵金华, 全吉. 具有模糊支付的Moran过程演化博弈动态[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(7): 71-76.
[6]	付小勇, 朱庆华, 田一辉. 基于系统动力学的政府和废旧电子产品处理商演化博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(7): 83-88.
[7]	刘延海, 包国宪. 基于第三方监督的地方政府权力清单构建中的演化博弈模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(7): 95-101.
[8]	熊强, 杨欣琦, 李治文. 网络安全漏洞信息披露中多元参与主体行为策略演化博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(7): 102-109.
[9]	姚锋敏, 闫颍洛, 刘珊, 滕春贤. 政府补贴下考虑CSR投入的闭环供应链回收及定价决策[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 69-76.
[10]	刘晓丽, 杨红. 基于关系契约视角的农户与农产品电子商务企业合作机制演化博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 96-102.
[11]	杨坤, 汪万, 胡斌. 全生命周期视阈下责任式创新的演化博弈及扩散机制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(6): 103-110.
[12]	杨苏, 林浩东. 考虑公众参与的公共工程项目应急管理演化分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(5): 95-101.
[13]	景熠, 杜鹏琦, 曹柳. 区域大气污染协同治理的府际间信任演化博弈研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(5): 110-115.
[14]	孙琦, 马骋, 柏庆国. 基于风险偏好的供应链企业社会责任投入与定价策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 47-53.
[15]	刘国巍, 邵云飞. 战略性新兴产业创新金融支持机理及两阶段演化博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 87-95.